Michael Paulauski♨️
banner
mike10010100.com
Michael Paulauski♨️
@mike10010100.com
I lose brain cells so you don't have to. Devops Galore. DemSoc liking anarchism. Antifascist. BLM/Abolish the Police. Views are mine, not employer’s. He/him
Pinned
Brigaders mass reported my account and Bluesky labeled it.

Spread the word and let people know how to turn it off.

bsky.app/profile/elea...
go to moderation settings, Bluesky official moderation service, scroll down to “rude,” turn it off
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
My deepest apologies on the above post, I got confused about which progressive org pushed which antisemitic conspiracy theory.

Mea culpa.
So you made a bullshit post about me, and you’re keeping it up because… why, exactly?

When you find out a post is spreading misinformation, you delete it and apologize, unless you’re a MAGA plant. This is like, basic third grade shit.
November 25, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Maybe take a backseat on this whole shebang after you had to publish this kind of thread.
(We also want to note that we’ve seen claims that the kid in the original video - who is not, to our knowledge, a member of 50501 - has made other unhinged and anti-Semitic posts. We haven’t been able to verify those claims yet, but want to be clear that we’re not avoiding the subject)
November 25, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell the truth."

- Oscar Wilde
November 25, 2025 at 3:55 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
I see this *all the time* with people online, even when their real-world names are attached to their online accounts.

Either you completely commit to a bit and be treated as a bit player, or you can be genuine & earnest. You can’t live your life as a motte and bailey and get mad when people notice!
November 25, 2025 at 3:55 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Oh sorry y'all just *posted* it.
So @50501movement.bsky.social is circulating a video of a guy saying candidates "are being paid to be Israel first, to be loyal to the Zionist project and not to their constituents, not to the American people." Which is just a hairs breadth away from saying "Zionist Occupied Government." Not great!
November 25, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
This guy is so funny
November 25, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
I think this is frankly more embarrassing than what's happening in America. We just got our entire political system hijacked by a single lunatic. The UK has a bunch of ostensibly serious people doing the dumbest shit imaginable.
are you fucking serious
November 25, 2025 at 3:01 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
The problem with this article is they asked too many lawyers and not enough historians.

As a historian, I'd say the legality of Trump's immunity and pardons depends on how he leaves office.

At 40 over 55 approval? He's immune.

At 25 over 65? He's probably not immune & self-pardons aren't legal.
November 25, 2025 at 3:20 PM
Aren't you the dude who claimed Schumer ended the shutdown because Israel told him to?
Chuck Schumer is a coward, a traitor, a liar, and a foe to the American people.

As such, I’m rooting for Van Hollen and co’s Fight Club to prevail, as should everyone else in the anti-Trump resistance. It’s our best hope at forming a real opposition party that’ll defeat the pedo-billionaire elite
November 25, 2025 at 3:52 PM
I genuinely do not understand this impulse. If anything, the argument would be that anonymity allows oneself to project *the most* accurate representation of your innermost beliefs, even if those beliefs are "I think being cruel and lying is fun".
'what I do/say when I'm granted anonymity and shelter from consequences is not an accurate representation of my innermost beliefs and values'
November 25, 2025 at 3:48 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
'what I do/say when I'm granted anonymity and shelter from consequences is not an accurate representation of my innermost beliefs and values'
November 25, 2025 at 3:31 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
I know this is screaming into a well because young people don't read books now, and they certainly don't read books published in 1941, but this is still within living memory.
Let Us Now Praise Famous Men - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
November 25, 2025 at 3:08 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
"Let Us Now Praise Famous Men" was published in *1941.* People today do not have any conception of the level of ambient poverty, malnutrition, and just general backwardness that existed in the US prior to WWII. These are people who remember the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl.
November 25, 2025 at 3:07 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
People feel less wealthy now than people in the 1950s/1960s did because the material conditions of you and the people around you is roughly on par, unlike the 50s/60s when a twenty minute drive out of town might return you to the 19th Century if not further back.
November 25, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
It's not that they're all equivalent, they actually are channers/KFers. That's how we got here.
November 25, 2025 at 3:19 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
If you look at the 2026 Senate map and think the path to a Dem majority is untested candidates and left populism messages (which has *flipped* basically no seats anywhere), you know less about how to win elections than, say, Chuck Schumer.
November 25, 2025 at 2:53 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
My interpretation of this is that they were certainly at least initially all in on Platner, and Heinrich and Murphy have both praised him a lot, but maybe cold feet on that now from some at least
Mills running was the entire catalyst for them forming
November 25, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
The Democratic "Fight Club" (can we work on that name) don't seem to have any sort of vision for what would be better, but seem to be sufficiently online that they're aware they're supposed to hate Schumer for reasons
November 25, 2025 at 3:03 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
They’re just the leftist equivalent of channers/Kiwi Farmers
November 25, 2025 at 3:08 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
First Secretary of Defense you could defeat by painting a tunnel on the side of a boulder.
The Secretary of Defense, ladies and gentlemen
November 25, 2025 at 1:55 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Mills running was the entire catalyst for them forming
November 25, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Extremely funny to see this headline, read the laudatory reactions on Bsky, then click through and learn that one of the only things they agree on is support for the Nazi Tattoo guy
Wow — Senators Van Hollen, Smith, Murphy, Sanders, Warren, Markey, Merkley, Heinrich have created an official internal "Fight Club."

They're challenging Schumer & Gillibrand's leadership, arguing the party is using an old, corporate-friendly playbook insufficient to take on Trump or win elections.
Chuck Schumer Faces Pushback From a ‘Fight Club’ of Senate Democrats
www.nytimes.com
November 25, 2025 at 2:19 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
The Secretary of Defense, ladies and gentlemen
November 25, 2025 at 1:23 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
think the story here is that DoD is trying to lever BSA into being Hitlerjugend
November 25, 2025 at 1:44 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
every single thing hegseth says in public reveals a bottomless pit of insecurity
When you draw a platoon leader like Hegseth, it’s your worst nightmare. You just ride it out until he’s gone and gets replaced by someone who isn’t a complete jackass. Only a fool like Trump would put one of them in charge of the entire defense department.
November 25, 2025 at 1:08 PM