The upside to all these companies replacing junior engineers with AI is that cybersecurity will remain a growth industry for at least another decade.

If they want to keep getting work, they can review (=rewrite) the AI slop, for 1/3 of their normal rate (which was already low to begin with)

Readers, we HAVE to complain about it, hold the publishers accountable and boycott these books

this changes the way you deal with their arguments.

instead of rebutting their points you dissect their motives, focusing not just whether something is true, but *why they are saying it*

you eat their frame

as a frame, "it's a fascist attack" not only tells us what's happening, it also explains why they're talking about it like they are. it makes legible not just their actions, but their explanations.

it eats their frame.

if they say something and you say that's not true, your response is still shaped like their frame

Your frame has to *contain and explain* their frame, not just contradict it.

You have to eat their frame. Like Kirby

This vehicle remains on my street. The driver was kidnapped at 5:30am, maybe the first of the day.

(I sent photo to PIRC so maybe they could find his family)

The van of the man they took. His children were safely retrieved by school staff. Keys were found and the van was moved shortly after.

And, not to be a hater but...

If you hear someone saying cooling will be easier in space, you can instantly write them off as someone who has never read a single relevant book or paper and never talked to a single person with undergraduate level expertise. This is very basic.