Beatrice is just the character of all time. I love her. She’s terrible. She’s a loud, abrasive asshole and I would die for her. She has a massive foot fetish and sadist streak. And that’s not even getting into the gender subtext. I however am a dumbass and didn’t figure it out until 110% through it
December 10, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Beatrice is just the character of all time. I love her. She’s terrible. She’s a loud, abrasive asshole and I would die for her. She has a massive foot fetish and sadist streak. And that’s not even getting into the gender subtext. I however am a dumbass and didn’t figure it out until 110% through it
This theory also works nicely for interpreting """questionable trans rep""". so like, in a story where theres a character who's obviously a trans woman but the text refers to her as a "femboy" or a slur, my interpretation would be that she *is* a trans woman, but the author was just biased and wrong
December 6, 2025 at 1:44 AM
This theory also works nicely for interpreting """questionable trans rep""". so like, in a story where theres a character who's obviously a trans woman but the text refers to her as a "femboy" or a slur, my interpretation would be that she *is* a trans woman, but the author was just biased and wrong
Thank you! the paper this if from is just "Encoding-Decoding" by Stuart Hall. I learned about this from the "Game Studies Study Buddies" episode on Stuart Hall.
December 6, 2025 at 1:38 AM
Thank you! the paper this if from is just "Encoding-Decoding" by Stuart Hall. I learned about this from the "Game Studies Study Buddies" episode on Stuart Hall.
So I think what you're talking about is a form of Oppositional Decoding, where in the text a character is written shallowly, but I can read against the author's bias and interpret a character as being fully realized, and interpret the pov as being simply unobservant
December 6, 2025 at 1:34 AM
So I think what you're talking about is a form of Oppositional Decoding, where in the text a character is written shallowly, but I can read against the author's bias and interpret a character as being fully realized, and interpret the pov as being simply unobservant
And based upon that idea, Stuart Hall distinguishes between Hegemonic Decoding, where a message is decoded according to the rules of those who are socially dominant, and Oppositional Decoding, where the reader consciously and intentionally decodes a message against the values of the powerful.
December 6, 2025 at 1:34 AM
And based upon that idea, Stuart Hall distinguishes between Hegemonic Decoding, where a message is decoded according to the rules of those who are socially dominant, and Oppositional Decoding, where the reader consciously and intentionally decodes a message against the values of the powerful.
so this isn't exactly what you are asking for, but Stuart Hall coined the theory of "Encoding-Decoding" of understanding texts. Very roughly, the interpretive framework used to create a message, Encoding, is separate from the interpretive framework used to understand that message, Decoding.
December 6, 2025 at 1:34 AM
so this isn't exactly what you are asking for, but Stuart Hall coined the theory of "Encoding-Decoding" of understanding texts. Very roughly, the interpretive framework used to create a message, Encoding, is separate from the interpretive framework used to understand that message, Decoding.
something i think about is that in order to be a really good soldier, there has to be something deeply wrong with you. And even if it was fighting against imperialism, a super soldier program would still be, even under the best of circumstances, deeply fucked up
November 27, 2025 at 8:19 PM
something i think about is that in order to be a really good soldier, there has to be something deeply wrong with you. And even if it was fighting against imperialism, a super soldier program would still be, even under the best of circumstances, deeply fucked up