Asserting the same thing again doesn't make it true or give the "AI" capabilities it lacks.

But what uniform was the piece wearing?... oh wait I see :)

Thanks, I hate it :)

??? is it good if I have no idea what this is??? :)

Herbert J. Gans in "The Uses of Poverty" says that one of the functions of poverty is to provide a labor pool that is "willing - or rather, unable to be unwilling - to perform dirty work at low cost"

i think about that too: "willing - or rather, unable to be unwilling"

The claim in the second paragraph that "AI does not lack capabilities, it's organisations that don't use it right" is just the "it can't be that stupid, you must be prompting it wrong" excuse.

The idea of Congress creating bodies that aren't completely dependent on the President's momentary whim seems very much in line with Article 1 but nobody reads that one...

the unitarian notion of accountability is, in general, very strange as it holds that a single election — the president’s reelect — is more democratically accountable than the rolling process of democratic assent produced by legislative elections and congressional oversight.

Then there is little point in talking about any of this - you've simply defined all thought as statistical a priori in a way which obfuscates the distinctions between LLM activity and cognition. Goodbye.

He would gladly pay you next year for a hamburger today.