Similar dynamic with Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Clearly unjust and cruel, and focusing on his case made the public more concerned about ICE and mass deportation, not less.
I follow the Caribbean boat strike issue closely, and haven't seen anyone hear about the double tap strike become OK with the others.

That was further affirmed by SCOTUS in the Wong Kim Ark case. So if yiu believe in originality or stare decisis this is an open and shut case. It's only hard if youre racist AF. (6th in an increasingly inaccurately named trilogy) www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt...

There was extensive documented debate at the time 14A was drafted as to whether it would apply to Chinese railroad workers and gold rush workers' children. The answer was unequivocally that yes, it did. (5/3)

Because some are asking... "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" is a carve out for ambassadors, tribal nations outside of US jurisdiction and invading armies. It decidedly does not apply to children of foreign-born parents (4/3)

I'd also note they already invalidated Section 3 that says that you can't hold federal office if you engaged in insurrection against the United States. These are not judges impartially applying the law. They are racist despots who despise American progress. (3/3)

That this SCOTUS used it to justify striking affirmative action bc it discriminated against WHITE people and now thinks their might be a colorable argument about the birthright part shows only that they are confused about whether the good team won the Civil War. (2/3)