@factsbyjimmy.bsky.social
BlueSky = BlockSky
Facts Over Feelings
If you're here to check my bio, you're most likely planning an ad hominem attack.
Facts Over Feelings
If you're here to check my bio, you're most likely planning an ad hominem attack.
Why did Kyle run from every encounter? They literally had to chase him.
There was no evidence presented during the trial to corroborate your claim.
Otherwise, PROVE IT.
That crucial piece of evidence eluded the prosecution despite 100's of potential witnesses & tons of video evidence.
There was no evidence presented during the trial to corroborate your claim.
Otherwise, PROVE IT.
That crucial piece of evidence eluded the prosecution despite 100's of potential witnesses & tons of video evidence.
December 19, 2025 at 10:31 PM
Why did Kyle run from every encounter? They literally had to chase him.
There was no evidence presented during the trial to corroborate your claim.
Otherwise, PROVE IT.
That crucial piece of evidence eluded the prosecution despite 100's of potential witnesses & tons of video evidence.
There was no evidence presented during the trial to corroborate your claim.
Otherwise, PROVE IT.
That crucial piece of evidence eluded the prosecution despite 100's of potential witnesses & tons of video evidence.
McGinnis is not a VERITAS journalist.
December 19, 2025 at 10:08 PM
McGinnis is not a VERITAS journalist.
The "protest" was held at Civic Center Park. Kyle didn't attend that event. He was up the street watching over a minority owned business & offering basic 1st aid to those same protesters turned rioters.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed.
December 19, 2025 at 9:59 PM
The "protest" was held at Civic Center Park. Kyle didn't attend that event. He was up the street watching over a minority owned business & offering basic 1st aid to those same protesters turned rioters.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed.
@greythempronouns.bsky.social ⬇️
Rosenbaum made premeditated threats earlier to Rittenhouse & followed through on those threats.
Rosenbaum made premeditated threats earlier to Rittenhouse & followed through on those threats.
December 19, 2025 at 9:36 PM
@greythempronouns.bsky.social ⬇️
Rosenbaum made premeditated threats earlier to Rittenhouse & followed through on those threats.
Rosenbaum made premeditated threats earlier to Rittenhouse & followed through on those threats.
There was no evidence presented during the trial to suggest that Rittenhouse was brandishing the firearm.
December 19, 2025 at 9:25 PM
There was no evidence presented during the trial to suggest that Rittenhouse was brandishing the firearm.
Your statement confirms Kyle's claim of self-defense.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed. Including rioters. He was no more conspicuous than everyone else.
There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed. Including rioters. He was no more conspicuous than everyone else.
There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed.
December 19, 2025 at 8:58 PM
Your statement confirms Kyle's claim of self-defense.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed. Including rioters. He was no more conspicuous than everyone else.
There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed. Including rioters. He was no more conspicuous than everyone else.
There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed.
IF you're concerned about what Kyle said, why aren't you concerned about the deadly threats made by Rosenbaum to Kyle that same night?
December 19, 2025 at 8:50 PM
IF you're concerned about what Kyle said, why aren't you concerned about the deadly threats made by Rosenbaum to Kyle that same night?
Context matters.
Rosenbaum told Kyle, "If I catch any of you guys ALONE tonight I’m going to fucking kill you."
Later, he suddenly surprised Kyle (who was ALONE & en route to extinguish a car fire) from behind a car, chased him & made a grab for the rifle.
That's a reasonable threat.
Rosenbaum told Kyle, "If I catch any of you guys ALONE tonight I’m going to fucking kill you."
Later, he suddenly surprised Kyle (who was ALONE & en route to extinguish a car fire) from behind a car, chased him & made a grab for the rifle.
That's a reasonable threat.
December 19, 2025 at 8:48 PM
Context matters.
Rosenbaum told Kyle, "If I catch any of you guys ALONE tonight I’m going to fucking kill you."
Later, he suddenly surprised Kyle (who was ALONE & en route to extinguish a car fire) from behind a car, chased him & made a grab for the rifle.
That's a reasonable threat.
Rosenbaum told Kyle, "If I catch any of you guys ALONE tonight I’m going to fucking kill you."
Later, he suddenly surprised Kyle (who was ALONE & en route to extinguish a car fire) from behind a car, chased him & made a grab for the rifle.
That's a reasonable threat.
"It doesn’t legally"
Your opinion doesn't supersede a WI state judge.
The gun charge was dismissed.
Your opinion doesn't supersede a WI state judge.
The gun charge was dismissed.
December 19, 2025 at 7:37 PM
"It doesn’t legally"
Your opinion doesn't supersede a WI state judge.
The gun charge was dismissed.
Your opinion doesn't supersede a WI state judge.
The gun charge was dismissed.
I'm not scrambling. Nothing you've posted has invalidated my claims.
Rittenhouse didn't break any law(s).
Kyle's reasons for being there were covered during the trial. Didn't you watch it?
Rittenhouse didn't break any law(s).
Kyle's reasons for being there were covered during the trial. Didn't you watch it?
December 19, 2025 at 7:29 PM
I'm not scrambling. Nothing you've posted has invalidated my claims.
Rittenhouse didn't break any law(s).
Kyle's reasons for being there were covered during the trial. Didn't you watch it?
Rittenhouse didn't break any law(s).
Kyle's reasons for being there were covered during the trial. Didn't you watch it?
Per WI state law, Kyle was carrying a long-barreled rifle legally in an open carry state.
Source: WI §948.60(3)(c).
The legality of the rifle was already litigated, covered & explained during the trial.
The prosecution agreed & conceded.
Since when does your OPINION supersede a WI state judge? 😂
Source: WI §948.60(3)(c).
The legality of the rifle was already litigated, covered & explained during the trial.
The prosecution agreed & conceded.
Since when does your OPINION supersede a WI state judge? 😂
December 19, 2025 at 7:07 PM
Per WI state law, Kyle was carrying a long-barreled rifle legally in an open carry state.
Source: WI §948.60(3)(c).
The legality of the rifle was already litigated, covered & explained during the trial.
The prosecution agreed & conceded.
Since when does your OPINION supersede a WI state judge? 😂
Source: WI §948.60(3)(c).
The legality of the rifle was already litigated, covered & explained during the trial.
The prosecution agreed & conceded.
Since when does your OPINION supersede a WI state judge? 😂
The first part of your post is a false equivalence.
Kyle originally traveled to Kenosha, where he had a secondary residence, on the 24th for work (RecPlex). Not for the riot. He spent the night at a friend's house.
He didn't decide to volunteer until later that day (25th).
No "authority" needed.
Kyle originally traveled to Kenosha, where he had a secondary residence, on the 24th for work (RecPlex). Not for the riot. He spent the night at a friend's house.
He didn't decide to volunteer until later that day (25th).
No "authority" needed.
December 19, 2025 at 6:36 PM
The first part of your post is a false equivalence.
Kyle originally traveled to Kenosha, where he had a secondary residence, on the 24th for work (RecPlex). Not for the riot. He spent the night at a friend's house.
He didn't decide to volunteer until later that day (25th).
No "authority" needed.
Kyle originally traveled to Kenosha, where he had a secondary residence, on the 24th for work (RecPlex). Not for the riot. He spent the night at a friend's house.
He didn't decide to volunteer until later that day (25th).
No "authority" needed.
"I with neighbors try to disarm you"
Your statement confirms Kyle's claim of self-defense.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed.
There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed.
Your statement confirms Kyle's claim of self-defense.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed.
There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed.
December 19, 2025 at 6:14 PM
"I with neighbors try to disarm you"
Your statement confirms Kyle's claim of self-defense.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed.
There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed.
Your statement confirms Kyle's claim of self-defense.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed.
There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed.
Not at all. Your original statement was quite clear.
That doesn't change the fact that you're incapable of explaining why the self-defense statute shouldn't have applied to Rittenhouse.
That doesn't change the fact that you're incapable of explaining why the self-defense statute shouldn't have applied to Rittenhouse.
December 19, 2025 at 12:29 AM
Not at all. Your original statement was quite clear.
That doesn't change the fact that you're incapable of explaining why the self-defense statute shouldn't have applied to Rittenhouse.
That doesn't change the fact that you're incapable of explaining why the self-defense statute shouldn't have applied to Rittenhouse.
That's not what you said in your previous post. 😂
You're incapable of explaining why the self-defense statute shouldn't have applied to Rittenhouse.
You're incapable of explaining why the self-defense statute shouldn't have applied to Rittenhouse.
December 19, 2025 at 12:23 AM
That's not what you said in your previous post. 😂
You're incapable of explaining why the self-defense statute shouldn't have applied to Rittenhouse.
You're incapable of explaining why the self-defense statute shouldn't have applied to Rittenhouse.
@davraye.bsky.social, here's testimony from Richie McGinnis.
Unlike you, I provided sources to support my claims.
You, 0.
Unlike you, I provided sources to support my claims.
You, 0.
December 18, 2025 at 11:13 PM
@davraye.bsky.social, here's testimony from Richie McGinnis.
Unlike you, I provided sources to support my claims.
You, 0.
Unlike you, I provided sources to support my claims.
You, 0.
Are you disputing Dr. Kelleys' testimony? He performed the autopsy on Rosenbaum.
"Unarmed" doesn't mean that Rosenbaum wasn't an active threat considering his earlier threats & ambush.
Also, your "active shooter" theory was debunked. Why did you lie?
"Unarmed" doesn't mean that Rosenbaum wasn't an active threat considering his earlier threats & ambush.
Also, your "active shooter" theory was debunked. Why did you lie?
December 18, 2025 at 10:34 PM
Are you disputing Dr. Kelleys' testimony? He performed the autopsy on Rosenbaum.
"Unarmed" doesn't mean that Rosenbaum wasn't an active threat considering his earlier threats & ambush.
Also, your "active shooter" theory was debunked. Why did you lie?
"Unarmed" doesn't mean that Rosenbaum wasn't an active threat considering his earlier threats & ambush.
Also, your "active shooter" theory was debunked. Why did you lie?
Active shooter? 😂
After Rittenhouse lawfully shot Rosenbaum he ran directly towards the police. He passed dozens of people who weren't fazed. Kyle wasn't actively shooting, attempting to shoot, or threatening anyone.
How exactly is that an active shooter?
After Rittenhouse lawfully shot Rosenbaum he ran directly towards the police. He passed dozens of people who weren't fazed. Kyle wasn't actively shooting, attempting to shoot, or threatening anyone.
How exactly is that an active shooter?
December 18, 2025 at 8:33 PM
Active shooter? 😂
After Rittenhouse lawfully shot Rosenbaum he ran directly towards the police. He passed dozens of people who weren't fazed. Kyle wasn't actively shooting, attempting to shoot, or threatening anyone.
How exactly is that an active shooter?
After Rittenhouse lawfully shot Rosenbaum he ran directly towards the police. He passed dozens of people who weren't fazed. Kyle wasn't actively shooting, attempting to shoot, or threatening anyone.
How exactly is that an active shooter?
Another reason not to trust the media.
December 18, 2025 at 11:28 AM
Another reason not to trust the media.
@ravindave63.bsky.social was clearly incapable.
December 18, 2025 at 7:13 AM
@ravindave63.bsky.social was clearly incapable.
Here's an example of NOT "in cold blood."
Rosenbaum told Kyle, "If I catch any of you guys ALONE tonight I’m going to fucking kill you."
Later, he suddenly surprised Kyle (who was ALONE & en route to extinguish a car fire) from behind a car, chased him & made a grab for the rifle.
Rosenbaum told Kyle, "If I catch any of you guys ALONE tonight I’m going to fucking kill you."
Later, he suddenly surprised Kyle (who was ALONE & en route to extinguish a car fire) from behind a car, chased him & made a grab for the rifle.
December 18, 2025 at 3:59 AM
Here's an example of NOT "in cold blood."
Rosenbaum told Kyle, "If I catch any of you guys ALONE tonight I’m going to fucking kill you."
Later, he suddenly surprised Kyle (who was ALONE & en route to extinguish a car fire) from behind a car, chased him & made a grab for the rifle.
Rosenbaum told Kyle, "If I catch any of you guys ALONE tonight I’m going to fucking kill you."
Later, he suddenly surprised Kyle (who was ALONE & en route to extinguish a car fire) from behind a car, chased him & made a grab for the rifle.
FYI.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed. Including rioters. He was no more conspicuous than everyone else.
There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed. Including rioters. He was no more conspicuous than everyone else.
There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed.
December 17, 2025 at 10:39 PM
FYI.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed. Including rioters. He was no more conspicuous than everyone else.
There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed. Including rioters. He was no more conspicuous than everyone else.
There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed.
There was no evidence presented during the trial to corroborate your claims.
Otherwise, PROVE IT.
That crucial piece of evidence eluded the prosecution despite 100's of potential witnesses & tons of video evidence.
Grosskreutz, who was shot by Kyle, testified that Kyle avoided confrontations.
Otherwise, PROVE IT.
That crucial piece of evidence eluded the prosecution despite 100's of potential witnesses & tons of video evidence.
Grosskreutz, who was shot by Kyle, testified that Kyle avoided confrontations.
December 17, 2025 at 10:33 PM
There was no evidence presented during the trial to corroborate your claims.
Otherwise, PROVE IT.
That crucial piece of evidence eluded the prosecution despite 100's of potential witnesses & tons of video evidence.
Grosskreutz, who was shot by Kyle, testified that Kyle avoided confrontations.
Otherwise, PROVE IT.
That crucial piece of evidence eluded the prosecution despite 100's of potential witnesses & tons of video evidence.
Grosskreutz, who was shot by Kyle, testified that Kyle avoided confrontations.
@ky-blue17.bsky.social wasn't up to the task of answering a simple question.
December 17, 2025 at 9:58 PM
@ky-blue17.bsky.social wasn't up to the task of answering a simple question.
By your logic, Joseph Rosenbaum, whom Rittenhouse legally defended himself against, is the face of the left. 🤷♂️
December 16, 2025 at 1:54 AM
By your logic, Joseph Rosenbaum, whom Rittenhouse legally defended himself against, is the face of the left. 🤷♂️