How long until you start defending the PRC because they're against US hegemony? The fuck does a three way fight even mean to you?

Unbelievable.

Dunno why you're pretending I'm defending the Zionist State, thought we knew each other long enough that YOU would know better, but if you can't perceive this any other way than "ZS bad ergo anyone opposed to ZS good" then you aren't the anarchist I thought you were.

Fuck you calling it "my special interest day" I'm interested in civilians not being murdered which is why I'm also against the genocide the ZS is doing and the colonialism of it and the USA etc but consistency is too much to ask

cn: domestic violence
_
_
your partner can beat and torture you leading to you fleeing them
then they can just call the police and get them to track you down and investigate you for a "crime"

Attacking civilians is bad, actually, and no, it's not "both sides"ing to say that one side using an attack on civvies to justify a genocide is evil just because the attack on those civvies was also evil.

I wrote a piece on the topic, actually:

immerautonom.noblogs.org/two-things-c...

How tf are y'all accusing a Palestinian of debasing herself because she's opposed to both a genocide and also a terrorist attack targeting civvies

anarchists should hate indiscriminate attacks on civilians and also colonialism, two things can be bad at the same time

...she didn't say anything to that effect? She literally said "ceasefire now" and that attacks on civvies are not good?

Two things can be bad at the same time y'all this is not team sports tf does a three way fight even mean to yall

True, sounds like they might have been a decent poster.

Oh well lol

Meh, sometimes the trash takes itself out 💅

a palestinian who regularly speaks out against israel's genocide in gaza is presently being demeaned by white leftists for recognizing the humanity of the victims of the october 7 attack which just shows white people of european christian heritage will never own their role in fomenting these horrors

I've heard of it but I didn't know until now that I need to actually watch it

Other women AND LITERAL CHILDREN makes me throw up a little bit when I see things that are supposed to be cutesy about """daddy daughter dates""" like holy shit how do these people live with themselves it's disgusting

Idk if I had a point beyond the horror and disgust but

About inviting her to bring a boyfriend over for dinner, because she was bi, and she had done that. But it's another woman, suddenly it's inherently pornographic to... eat dinner with your family.

The purity culture that makes women responsible not only for their own sexualization, but that of

Was inviting them (the dad and her two brothers) to imagine them having sex and like... When she was telling me this, the way she looked as if she'd had spiders crawling on her skin she felt so violated, and rightly so, but it just really struck me because he absolutely would not have said that

Very much a survivor of some gnarly abuse, but the religious bullshit still made the path to a healthy relationship a minefield.

Anyway I was reminded of this because the idea that her mother should be punished was because by inviting his daughter and her girlfriend to dinner with the family she

dad anymore and had a strained relationship with her mom because she was, to her credit, still kinda trying in her fundamentalist religious way to be in her daughter's life without trying to be a tyrant, and had even left her children's dad over his treatment of their gay daughter, and her mom was

I dated a woman once whose pastor dad's response to his daughter dating another woman in college (not me, I came after) was to beat and berate his wife because she apparently did a horrible thing as a mother by inviting her and her girlfriend to dinner one weekend. This woman didn't speak to her

CW sexualizing a child

every so often i think about this one pastor who posted about "disciplining" his wife for allowing their 6 year old daughter to wear a shirt with exposed shoulders (which is too "immodest") and i think that understanding that RW, religious men view 6yo girls as potential >

They’re pulling cops and feds off of every other case they have in order to pull off this show of strength. It’s the kind of political environment that actually makes a lot of illegal operations much easier: proportional to how dangerous—and expansive—it makes the social margins.

This does not make them less dangerous, I want to be clear about that. It just changes the nature of the threat we’re dealing with. They’re not interested in particulars, accuracy; they’re interested in a spectacle of power and brutality.

Pretty much every public statement made by this administration about military and police force has been an announcement that they’re abandoning the strategic benefits of counterinsurgency in order to cull the population and project a patriarchal warrior fantasy.

Instead of taking care to alienate insurgents from the general population, attempting to establish state legitimacy, etc. they’re just declaring broad swaths of the population de-facto insurgent and applying brute force accordingly.

Under the second Trump administration it’s hard to call much of its movements counterinsurgent, when by the military’s own theory of counterinsurgency they’re repeatedly taking actions that exacerbate an insurgent political environment.

By the wide documentation of resistance to ICE, it seems to be having exactly the effect military counterinsurgency theorists warn against: much of the population sees their interests more aligned with state “enemies” than with its agents and are willing to act accordingly.