samus aran enjoyer
@riotlinguist.bsky.social
6.4K followers 280 following 6.9K posts
anarchist. sad and angry all the time. transfeminism enjoyer. tme genderqueer. they/them. read some stuff: immerautonom.noblogs.org https://ko-fi.com/narcissus_andtheircats
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by samus aran enjoyer
caitlinmoriah.bsky.social
linguistics is being done in the comments of the white house antifa briefing
Can't listen Sorry women have Vocal fry except
Pam Bondi
riotlinguist.bsky.social
this wouldnt change anything, because they're expressing their sincere values
riotlinguist.bsky.social
well yeah pro-natalism is always anti-immigrant and nationalist
riotlinguist.bsky.social
just funny seeing gender marginalized folks, women, and body autonomy advocates accurately identify a policy proposal that would penalize them for not providing sexual and reproductive labor to cis men while so many cis men jump in to play innocent like it's just a completely reasonable idea
riotlinguist.bsky.social
(the reason why is because they think the rest of us are fucking stupid, and also that their interests are the natural benefit of all humanity bc the rest of us are accessories to their existence as the protagonists of all human history)
riotlinguist.bsky.social
intellectually i can comprehend *why* cis men believe they're so clever for finding ways to frame policies that benefit them at the cost of limiting or pressuring the body autonomy and civil rights of everyone else, but it's still difficult to believe how fucking smarmy they are about it
riotlinguist.bsky.social
very telling how many smug cis men think they're being very clever by motte & bailey-ing explicit pro-natalism (which is always always explicitly non-debatably reactionary, patriarchal, to the benefit of cis men at a cost to everyone else) into "um it's just the child tax credit lololol"
riotlinguist.bsky.social
i don't remember the @ to tell you to block anyway, sorry :')
riotlinguist.bsky.social
i remain extremely salty about this interaction (i forget the @ and am not willing to go find it) bc i also know this person posts screenshots of me out of context claiming that o "advocate believing in sanatic panic SRA" bc i said FMS is pseudoscience & most alleged cases were in custody battles
riotlinguist.bsky.social
big shocked pikachu moment lmao
riotlinguist.bsky.social
purity balls aren't a violation of the NAP apparently, but believing CSA survivors about their fathers is, very convenient set of positions
riotlinguist.bsky.social
> love the idea of penalizing women for exercising body autonomy "the wrong way" (not fucking cis men and producing cis men's future sexual property for them)
riotlinguist.bsky.social
*believes (present tense)

shout out to the libertarian "anarchist" who shares william's belief in the sacrosanct right to hold children as sexual property, but also believes children's reports of CSA are intrinsically untrustworthy cuz maybe their memories are false, i have to assume they also >
Reposted by samus aran enjoyer
moiradonegan.bsky.social
"Reproductive freedom should be sacrosanct" and "we should tax women who refuse to breed" are not in fact mutually compatible statements.
opinionhaver.bsky.social
My most controversial take on this is probably that while I think reproductive freedom should be sacrosanct, I don’t really have any problem with additional taxes on (high income) childless people. Someone gotta pay into the pensions!
riotlinguist.bsky.social
guy who believed purity balls have a right to exist "in a free society" also believes women who don't fulfill their childbearing purpose should be penalized, more at 11
opinionhaver.bsky.social
My most controversial take on this is probably that while I think reproductive freedom should be sacrosanct, I don’t really have any problem with additional taxes on (high income) childless people. Someone gotta pay into the pensions!
Reposted by samus aran enjoyer
iid.bsky.social
“Women who don’t fulfill their biological purpose should be punished”
opinionhaver.bsky.social
My most controversial take on this is probably that while I think reproductive freedom should be sacrosanct, I don’t really have any problem with additional taxes on (high income) childless people. Someone gotta pay into the pensions!
riotlinguist.bsky.social
sometimes the squeaks are less "soft" and more "impatient screaming" but it's still precious
Reposted by samus aran enjoyer
nerdjpg.com
Welcome to the capitalist innovation museum we got

- scam machine
- psychosis inducing machine
- weapons of mass destruction
- button you push that makes the planet hotter
- markets that intentionally starve people
- clothes that fall apart after washing them 1 time
- medicine you can’t afford
Reposted by samus aran enjoyer
pookleblinky.bsky.social
The COO of bluesky, Rose, is following the heritage foundation account on bluesky.
soyweiser.bsky.social
She is the COO en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_o... of bsky. This is worrying because after the 'we are turning waffles into an anti-trans thing' by the CEO the CEO started to follow a transphobe. Shows a pattern.

Wonder when we find out one of them follows the discovery institute.
riotlinguist.bsky.social
cleaning the litter boxes is a gross and sisyphean chore, and having multiple shit-boxes in my home is truly irrational behavior, but alas... the little creatures squeak softly for treats and snuggle me when i sleep