@fineeaton.bsky.social
We could've had Cisneros but Pelosi had to tilt the scales for her corruption buddy when it got close.
December 8, 2025 at 2:18 AM
We could've had Cisneros but Pelosi had to tilt the scales for her corruption buddy when it got close.
Cuellar was and is notable for being vocally anti-abortion and pro-Citizens United. We absolutely do not need these people in the "big tent" when an alternative candidate who was equally or more viable was right there.
December 7, 2025 at 10:23 PM
Cuellar was and is notable for being vocally anti-abortion and pro-Citizens United. We absolutely do not need these people in the "big tent" when an alternative candidate who was equally or more viable was right there.
Who cares? That is the lowest possible bar.
December 7, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Who cares? That is the lowest possible bar.
Keep the camera on them, but cut off their mic and use the time to read the facts to their face.
December 7, 2025 at 3:47 PM
Keep the camera on them, but cut off their mic and use the time to read the facts to their face.
Pelosi endorsed Cuellar over Cisneros when he was already publically corrupt as well 🤷♂️
December 7, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Pelosi endorsed Cuellar over Cisneros when he was already publically corrupt as well 🤷♂️
Do I need a prior authorization with my insurer for that?
December 6, 2025 at 10:47 PM
Do I need a prior authorization with my insurer for that?
Two things are true:
Punching a bully in the nose will get you suspended
and
A bully will not stop until they face material consequences
Punching a bully in the nose will get you suspended
and
A bully will not stop until they face material consequences
December 6, 2025 at 4:38 PM
Two things are true:
Punching a bully in the nose will get you suspended
and
A bully will not stop until they face material consequences
Punching a bully in the nose will get you suspended
and
A bully will not stop until they face material consequences
There's no requirement without an enforcement mechanism. This is simply a request that will be ignored. Then what?
December 6, 2025 at 1:47 PM
There's no requirement without an enforcement mechanism. This is simply a request that will be ignored. Then what?
Lady who laugh weird > Sociopath who doesn't laugh
December 6, 2025 at 2:22 AM
Lady who laugh weird > Sociopath who doesn't laugh
When was counter-factualism *not* a hallmark of republicanism? Clearly since Reagan?
Or is the distinction the lack of facade and the sneering pride of ignorance?
Or is the distinction the lack of facade and the sneering pride of ignorance?
December 5, 2025 at 8:00 PM
When was counter-factualism *not* a hallmark of republicanism? Clearly since Reagan?
Or is the distinction the lack of facade and the sneering pride of ignorance?
Or is the distinction the lack of facade and the sneering pride of ignorance?
‼️ Well in that case,
December 5, 2025 at 4:03 PM
‼️ Well in that case,
Slotkin just wants to be on-the-record voting yes for her corporate benefactors.
December 5, 2025 at 3:32 PM
Slotkin just wants to be on-the-record voting yes for her corporate benefactors.
The Supreme Court isn’t legitimate and probably won’t be in my lifetime unless the klansmen are kicked out. They are proudly corrupt. The branch might as not exist
December 5, 2025 at 2:25 AM
And the next thing he said was "...and that's why I'm calling for a war crimes tribunal", right?
December 4, 2025 at 9:31 PM
And the next thing he said was "...and that's why I'm calling for a war crimes tribunal", right?
It's notable that he tends to publish his intent-to-mislead manifesto before each new propaganda campaign. Somehow his confession of bad faith never makes the story.
December 4, 2025 at 2:17 AM
It's notable that he tends to publish his intent-to-mislead manifesto before each new propaganda campaign. Somehow his confession of bad faith never makes the story.
"Just like every single politician", I reject any notion I should reflect or learn from this experience
December 3, 2025 at 2:41 PM
"Just like every single politician", I reject any notion I should reflect or learn from this experience
It's worth highlighting that the product that is 500x more expensive is also 500 lower quality.
November 23, 2025 at 11:58 PM
It's worth highlighting that the product that is 500x more expensive is also 500 lower quality.
What would they know about that
November 21, 2025 at 5:27 PM
What would they know about that
Reposted
Bingo.
And imagine the Democratic politician who said this did so as he sat next to the podcaster's assassin whom he reminded everyone was his close personal friend
And imagine the Democratic politician who said this did so as he sat next to the podcaster's assassin whom he reminded everyone was his close personal friend
Imagine if a Democratic politician said “a lot of people didn’t like him” with respect to that assassinated podcaster. Seriously.
November 18, 2025 at 6:05 PM
Bingo.
And imagine the Democratic politician who said this did so as he sat next to the podcaster's assassin whom he reminded everyone was his close personal friend
And imagine the Democratic politician who said this did so as he sat next to the podcaster's assassin whom he reminded everyone was his close personal friend