Charlotte
@fireantprincess.bsky.social
2.8K followers 3.3K following 17K posts
intersectional anarchatransfeminist, nihilist, physicist, demigoddess, cupcake • we don't believe in nations or property Ⓐ • she/her
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Charlotte
joomee.bsky.social
Kinktober Day 2: Face Sitting

emily follows direction well... very well.

#kinktober
greyscale illustration of a couple having sex. the cis girlfriend, camille, is on top, sitting back on her transfem partner emily’s face. camille is flushed and moaning, eyes half-lidded, hips grinding with abandon. emily lies beneath her, hands gripping camille’s ass, aroused and hard. the bed is soft and lived-in.
fireantprincess.bsky.social
and he was upset I called him conservative lol
Reposted by Charlotte
stephentotilo.bsky.social
SCOOP: Last year, Ubisoft cancelled an Assassin's Creed game set during Reconstruction. Was to feature a Black Assassin who, among other things, fought the rise of the Klan

Sources: Leadership nixed it over concerns re: U.S. political climate, backlash to Yasuke

www.gamefile.news/p/scoop-ubis...
Scoop: Ubisoft cancelled a post-Civil War Assassin’s Creed last year
Company leadership deemed the project too controversial for the moment, sources tell Game File
www.gamefile.news
Reposted by Charlotte
phylan.website
every social media site, this one more than most, seems to encode the very American "nudity = satan" ethos into their content moderation by default, thinking this is the baseline somehow
fireantprincess.bsky.social
apart from everything else I think bsky should just not autolabel any content that is not harmful because while there is a clear harm prevention in autofiltering CSAM autoflagging people’s bodies as sexual is also harmful.
Reposted by Charlotte
katzish.bsky.social
Got a recent Pulitzer for warning on the spread of autocracy around the globe, after decades of service to the paper? You can bet your butt you're getting laid off by form email, on Yom Kippur
davejorgenson.bsky.social
The Post laid off seemingly the remaining of their liberal-leaning staff members on Opinion last Thursday, when some of them were observing Yom Kippur.

from @oliverdarcy.bsky.social for Status
status.news/p/washington-post-opinion-cuts-adam-oneal
Reposted by Charlotte
casssdreams.neocities.org
this a link to a news article about someone being fired related to censorship of the human body in relation to classical art

what a joke that it was autolabelled
how does an ai autolabeller make that distinction?

that you view human bodies as inherently sexual is a you problem that rightoids also tend to have
https://apnews.com/article/florida-censorship-david-statue-nudity-michelangelo-84bba40d47339eff7770ec58fcb23dd1
fireantprincess.bsky.social
it’s just that you can’t train a model to understand the cultural nuances and differences between scar tissue. you will necessarily get stuff like that. which brings me back to my original point: unless the image has a chance of being harmful, categorizing the image is more harmful
fireantprincess.bsky.social
he blocked me but BODIES IMPLIES SEXUAL? hahahaha
Hutch @hutchx86.dev • 3m
- Replied to Castration m
• he/him
How do you make the distinction whether it's harmful or not? What's not harmful to you could be to others.
Can you give me an example of the type of content you mean? The
"bodies" in the initial implies sexual to me.
fireantprincess.bsky.social
I saw that being labeled as graphic or self harm, not adult content I think
fireantprincess.bsky.social
he started it, I am not harassing him, and I have a reason.
fireantprincess.bsky.social
the only thing worse than seeing porn is obviously seeing -weird- porn, because the mind of a conservative cannot handle seeing weird things.
fireantprincess.bsky.social
use of the word -degenerate-, opinion disregarded.
fireantprincess.bsky.social
like I’m sorry seeing porn in your timeline -is not harm- no matter how little you want to see it and -my point was that labeling non-sexual images as sexual is harm-
fireantprincess.bsky.social
this dude isn’t even american, amazingly, even though he has the reading comprehension and the puritanical mindset!!!
fireantprincess.bsky.social
it’s kinda funny that a person who clearly can’t read tells you to read lol
fireantprincess.bsky.social
and I was making the point that you seeing a nude body is less harmful than someone being labeled as sexual wrongly.
fireantprincess.bsky.social
and things being autolabeled actually implies false positives and false negatives, so yes it was clear.
fireantprincess.bsky.social
you being too stupid to read is not my problem, my post was actually quite clear about the context.
fireantprincess.bsky.social
btw I wasn’t even talking about naked bodies anywhere, I said tagging non-sexual content as sexual is harmful.
fireantprincess.bsky.social
that was not a comparison. you said “if A is not X then B is not X either, right?”
there is no comparison in that statement.