PhD Candidate at University of Maryland, College Park | On the 2024-25 job market | Applied micro, development, family, and environmental economics | Previously @WorldBank @Yale @LUMS #EconSky #EnvEcon #DevEcon
For more, read my paper: www.fatimanajeeb.com/research
For more, read my paper: www.fatimanajeeb.com/research
Policy takeaway:
🌾 Climate adaptation must address intra-household inequalities.
👩🌾 Supporting diverse, resilient income opportunities for women is key to reducing vulnerability in future climate shocks.
Policy takeaway:
🌾 Climate adaptation must address intra-household inequalities.
👩🌾 Supporting diverse, resilient income opportunities for women is key to reducing vulnerability in future climate shocks.
The link between women’s declining earnings and resource shares is clear: As women’s relative earnings fall, so does their share of household resources. Addressing this is critical for reducing vulnerabilities.
The link between women’s declining earnings and resource shares is clear: As women’s relative earnings fall, so does their share of household resources. Addressing this is critical for reducing vulnerabilities.
What drives this?
Post-flood, women’s relative earnings decline by 4.5 pp within 6 months, narrowing after 4 years but not always fully recovering. Limited job flexibility for women—compared to men who transition to day labor—exacerbates the inequality.
What drives this?
Post-flood, women’s relative earnings decline by 4.5 pp within 6 months, narrowing after 4 years but not always fully recovering. Limited job flexibility for women—compared to men who transition to day labor—exacerbates the inequality.
The material impact? After 4 years, women in flooded households have an individual-level budget of $4.7/day, compared to $7.9/day for men.
For context, the extreme poverty line is $2.15/day. These shifts push women closer to this poverty threshold while men move further from it.
The material impact? After 4 years, women in flooded households have an individual-level budget of $4.7/day, compared to $7.9/day for men.
For context, the extreme poverty line is $2.15/day. These shifts push women closer to this poverty threshold while men move further from it.
Intrahousehold gender inequalities increase with the number of floods experienced.
Intrahousehold gender inequalities increase with the number of floods experienced.
Floods trigger a redistribution of household resources:
🌊Women lose ~9 pp of their resource share (compared to women in unaffected households), while men gain ~11 pp within 6 months.
🌊These shifts persist: ~7 pp lower for women & ~12 pp higher for men even 4 years later.
Floods trigger a redistribution of household resources:
🌊Women lose ~9 pp of their resource share (compared to women in unaffected households), while men gain ~11 pp within 6 months.
🌊These shifts persist: ~7 pp lower for women & ~12 pp higher for men even 4 years later.
Here’s the setup:
🌊Data: Household surveys (2011, 2015, 2018) + satellite-based flood data.
🌊Design: Villages with similar flood risk, differing in flood timing and exposure.
🌊Focus: Immediate (6 months post-flood) & longer-term (4 years) impacts.
Here’s the setup:
🌊Data: Household surveys (2011, 2015, 2018) + satellite-based flood data.
🌊Design: Villages with similar flood risk, differing in flood timing and exposure.
🌊Focus: Immediate (6 months post-flood) & longer-term (4 years) impacts.
Key questions:
1️⃣ Do floods shift resources away from women (and children) towards men?
2️⃣ How persistent are these effects?
To answer, I combine structural estimation of resource shares with quasi-experimental variation in flood exposure.
Key questions:
1️⃣ Do floods shift resources away from women (and children) towards men?
2️⃣ How persistent are these effects?
To answer, I combine structural estimation of resource shares with quasi-experimental variation in flood exposure.
I use “resource shares”—the fraction of total household spending allocated to each member—to capture individual well-being.
Since consumption is measured typically at the household level, resource shares are not directly observed and are structurally estimated.
I use “resource shares”—the fraction of total household spending allocated to each member—to capture individual well-being.
Since consumption is measured typically at the household level, resource shares are not directly observed and are structurally estimated.
I investigate how exposure to floods affects the material well-being of men, women, and children living under the same roof in the rural Bangladeshi context, revealing who bears the brunt of climate shocks.
I investigate how exposure to floods affects the material well-being of men, women, and children living under the same roof in the rural Bangladeshi context, revealing who bears the brunt of climate shocks.