Jude
gaffelet.bsky.social
Jude
@gaffelet.bsky.social
female eunuch of the furniture industry
the word is not "operative", it's "optative" :3. it's a grammatical mood in several languages which can be constructed with the particle "may" in English (our verbs don't really inflect for mood)
November 28, 2025 at 3:26 PM
compensated for what, and by whom? and why is this in the optative? if you pray, you should do it in private lest Allah strike you down for vanity
November 28, 2025 at 8:24 AM
so many people think class analysis through a marxist framework is about lionizing the working class and demonizing what is outside it. while there are ethical dimensions to marxist thought it is first and foremost an account of political economy, not ethics. "petit bourgeois" =/= "demoniacal"
November 27, 2025 at 5:34 AM
marxism is famously in favor of the right to hold private property! it's, in fact, definitely most assuredly the crux of the entire analytical framework. marx himself said "workers of the world, you have nothing to lose but your private property, which should never be abolished" in the grundrisse
November 26, 2025 at 7:10 PM
you should try being regular to other people for once, instead of an insane creep
November 26, 2025 at 3:29 PM
well, no. but if you disagree with the content of something i said maybe you should try voicing your disagreement as a rational criticism instead of slack-jawedly pointing at a stranger and speculating about their sexual morality like a pious village dunce
November 26, 2025 at 4:52 AM
i truly dk who that is. have a good night. read a book someday!
November 26, 2025 at 3:30 AM
you care about using your idea of what "theory" says to defend your intuitive conception of the just. that's fine. just own that instead of beleaguring me about reading Marx or whatever. it's fine.
November 26, 2025 at 3:29 AM
Capital is an account of the historical formation of capitalism that traces its development over millennia of human existence to show the continuity and discontinuity of economic systems. we still live under capitalism, hence analysis of capitalism is still relevant
November 26, 2025 at 3:27 AM
lol your only reading materials about communism appear to be youtube videos and video games, which you have cited in lieu of anything approaching an analytical concept from marxism. please remember to have me executed in the gamer revolution, though
November 26, 2025 at 3:25 AM
i never claimed to be a marxist either. it's just very clear that you, who has made no argument from marxist principles, only the principles of vague left-liberalism, are infinitely further from marxist than i!
November 26, 2025 at 3:24 AM
they have google translate on your ipad in addition to cocomelon? impressive! sehr guht, お疲れ様!
November 26, 2025 at 3:23 AM
i mean you can certainly claim to have read marx, but you still have cited no concepts nor theories, even obliquely, for which he is responsible, and you merely make vague statements like "PAINFULLY OBVIOUS" without evidentiary support that reek of illiteracy
November 26, 2025 at 3:21 AM
i've cited quite a few ideas directly from marx, which you don't believe to be marxist because they fail to accord with what is intuitively correct to you. not my problem though! again, please attempt to purchase and read the books someday
November 26, 2025 at 3:12 AM
I don't know who that is because I don't get my info from youtube, كلب امريكي
November 26, 2025 at 3:11 AM
you have yet to make a substantive point beyond using epithets. you are flailing like an infant that doesn't want to learn to walk because it dreads to fall. hopefully you use the money you normally reserve for furry porn comms to purchase and read a book someday
November 26, 2025 at 3:10 AM
i mean i assume i look dumb to you in the same way that someone talking to a paleolithic man about iphones would appear to them a gibbering idiot and get their skull bashed in with a rock.
November 26, 2025 at 3:08 AM
no it doesn't! that's not part of marx's paradigm, with which you are free to disagree, but "reinventing your own slapdash half-witted perspective from first principles every 50 years" is explicitly contradictory to historical and dialectical materialism
November 26, 2025 at 3:07 AM
i mean i suppose you can view history as a disconnected set of incoherent and causeless happenings completely unrelated to what came before or follows after but it certainly isn't marxist! it's just vulgar left-liberalism. which is fine. people disagreeing with me keeps things interesting!
November 26, 2025 at 3:05 AM
a middle manager is actually not petit bourgeois, while an independent artisan is! this is part of very basic marxist analysis, which is not equivalent to your vibes-centric reactionary flailing
November 26, 2025 at 3:03 AM