Genderless Rodent says Santa is Antifa
banner
genderlessrodent.bsky.social
Genderless Rodent says Santa is Antifa
@genderlessrodent.bsky.social
Queer, Non-binary and Nerdy

PDX Local Politics

They/Them

Profile pic: a cool rat with sunglasses and a denim jacket giving finger guns

Banner pic: happy gay stripper trans kids sodomy overdose festival.
Because otherwise it sounds like you think homeless sex offenders just need to be back in jail.
December 5, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Second paragraph
You said Inappropriate/illegal. Why include inappropriate if you meant only illegal?

Because based on your rhetoric it's also about controlling non illegal social behavior.
December 5, 2025 at 7:19 PM
What about registered in a tent on the street, is that better?
December 5, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Are you speculating?
December 5, 2025 at 7:17 PM
It's also illegal. Were you unaware of that?
December 5, 2025 at 7:11 PM
I mean, the whole core basis of Wilson's plan is irrational if you value the safety and autonomy of homeless people. It's rational if you don't.
December 5, 2025 at 7:11 PM
So as long as it doesn't go below that they're in the clear?
December 5, 2025 at 7:10 PM
It's also right here.

No one is putting words in your mouth. People are describing what you said, and you're mad because it's accurate that you're just speculating because you like a person's opinions and politics.
Except when you did directly. Its weird you are doing this. No one is making you!
December 5, 2025 at 7:09 PM
You said Inappropriate/illegal. Why include inappropriate if you meant only illegal?

Because based on your rhetoric it's also about controlling non illegal social behavior.
December 5, 2025 at 7:08 PM
I am. Maybe you can point me to the exact wording in it that backs up your statement?
December 5, 2025 at 7:07 PM
Instead of acting out you could address your own statement.
December 5, 2025 at 7:05 PM
This doesn't mandate you go to a shelter.

What shelter do you think a sex offender should be in?
December 5, 2025 at 7:05 PM
That you were asking about something else?
December 5, 2025 at 7:04 PM
Are you a lawyer, or are you speculating?
December 5, 2025 at 7:03 PM
You said Inappropriate. Being inappropriate isn't against the law. If you had just left it at illegal you'd have a point, but you didn't.
December 5, 2025 at 7:03 PM
I would heavily disagree with that framing but that also doesn't reflect your point.
December 5, 2025 at 7:02 PM
Penalites
December 5, 2025 at 7:01 PM
But we don't have any now right?

Like, we never got one with any other policies we've had?
December 5, 2025 at 6:59 PM
So stop and frisk would be okay if it was effective?
December 5, 2025 at 6:58 PM
This seems like a really flimsy excuse. You can track people without running for warrants, right?
December 5, 2025 at 6:57 PM
So it's okay to stop people and frisk them as long as they are being inappropriate or violating any sort of statute? Stop and frisk is only not okay because it was done to the wrong people?
December 5, 2025 at 6:56 PM
And if you don't think they haven't, maybe you've missed all the stuff about it?

I've certainly seen it.
December 5, 2025 at 6:53 PM
Yes, that does not imply objection or alternatives. It implies more or other.
December 5, 2025 at 6:52 PM
That wasn't what Alex said though.
December 5, 2025 at 6:50 PM