The GentleHacker
@gentlehacker.io
A Victorian Gentleman Scientist with inexplicable access to a Macbook and internet access.
Svelte and TypeScript for Love, Developer Advocate for Money, Engineer, Linguist and Jolly Good Fellow. He/Him.
More: https://dylanlacey.com
Svelte and TypeScript for Love, Developer Advocate for Money, Engineer, Linguist and Jolly Good Fellow. He/Him.
More: https://dylanlacey.com
I wonder, @qbhelp.bsky.social , if your colleagues over in Quickbooks Consumer are quite well, because this response is UTTERLY REDICULOUS.
"20 Jun 2024" is not an INVALID format, it is, for QuickBooks, an UNSUPPORTED format, and that in itself beggars belief.
"20 Jun 2024" is not an INVALID format, it is, for QuickBooks, an UNSUPPORTED format, and that in itself beggars belief.
March 24, 2025 at 1:21 AM
I wonder, @qbhelp.bsky.social , if your colleagues over in Quickbooks Consumer are quite well, because this response is UTTERLY REDICULOUS.
"20 Jun 2024" is not an INVALID format, it is, for QuickBooks, an UNSUPPORTED format, and that in itself beggars belief.
"20 Jun 2024" is not an INVALID format, it is, for QuickBooks, an UNSUPPORTED format, and that in itself beggars belief.
I do not understand how Intuit is worth 169.08 billion US Dollars peddling this user hostile TRASH.
Why ask these questions without showing an example? Why not guess? Why are there limited acceptable date formats?
Why ask these questions without showing an example? Why not guess? Why are there limited acceptable date formats?
March 24, 2025 at 1:15 AM
I do not understand how Intuit is worth 169.08 billion US Dollars peddling this user hostile TRASH.
Why ask these questions without showing an example? Why not guess? Why are there limited acceptable date formats?
Why ask these questions without showing an example? Why not guess? Why are there limited acceptable date formats?
What a *fascinating* and highly pertinent question the Financial Times is asking here.
The reserved answer is no.
(The unreserved answer is "What blithering idiot editor decided this was worthy content, of course not you credulous buffoon")
The reserved answer is no.
(The unreserved answer is "What blithering idiot editor decided this was worthy content, of course not you credulous buffoon")
January 2, 2025 at 9:30 AM
What a *fascinating* and highly pertinent question the Financial Times is asking here.
The reserved answer is no.
(The unreserved answer is "What blithering idiot editor decided this was worthy content, of course not you credulous buffoon")
The reserved answer is no.
(The unreserved answer is "What blithering idiot editor decided this was worthy content, of course not you credulous buffoon")
I am *greatly* pleased to announce that I'm speaking at #DDDBrisbane, about #demographics, and #system_design, and how we make bad assumptions about the former when doing the latter.
It's called "Names, and Other Lies" and I'm quite proud of it. Do come if you're in #Brisbane (and have a ticket.)
It's called "Names, and Other Lies" and I'm quite proud of it. Do come if you're in #Brisbane (and have a ticket.)
December 6, 2024 at 9:47 AM
I am *greatly* pleased to announce that I'm speaking at #DDDBrisbane, about #demographics, and #system_design, and how we make bad assumptions about the former when doing the latter.
It's called "Names, and Other Lies" and I'm quite proud of it. Do come if you're in #Brisbane (and have a ticket.)
It's called "Names, and Other Lies" and I'm quite proud of it. Do come if you're in #Brisbane (and have a ticket.)