Q. McLamore
@ghawinriver.bsky.social
2.8K followers 1.6K following 2.8K posts
Assistant Professor of Social Psychology (They/Them). Views expressed are strictly my own and not those of my employer.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
ghawinriver.bsky.social
One thing that needs to be stressed here: the fact that the refs (namely, the news media, dominant political parties, academic institutions, social media platforms) consistently sided with these people is how we got here.
elivalley.bsky.social
More history from this Nazi adulated by the Trump team. These are explicit, proud Nazis who scream and cry and call every referee they can find when you quote their Nazism back to them.
Multiple tweets from Nazi Jack Posobiec in 2016 making "jokes" involving the Nazi code "1488."
Reposted by Q. McLamore
katestarbird.bsky.social
Siva Vaidhyanathan on the Trump admin’s proposed “compact” for universities (to give up academic freedom in exchange for favorable treatment by the Trump government): “This ‘compact’ is more like an invitation to borrow money from the mob, with substantial control and future penalties assured.”
ghawinriver.bsky.social
You know me, Lexi! I made absolutely zero attempts because bluntly, it was impossible for my community to hate me any more than it already did. Had nothing to lose by pretending otherwise.
ghawinriver.bsky.social
Like to be clear: this isn't a social constructionist blank-slate take here; I'm just saying that even if none of that was true (which it is), not one thing would change, because it would still be immoral and cruel to arbitrarily quash TGE identities.
ghawinriver.bsky.social
Oh, to be clear: this is true. Obviously. What I'm pointing out is that even if it provably was not, nothing would change. TGE healthcare would still be a right even so because self-determination is a right. That the best evidence we have also suggests a biological component magnifies this.
ghawinriver.bsky.social
Probably because doing anything else--like taking calculated risks, acknowledging the difference between frontline and support roles, what-have-you--would involve actually imagining a future. It's suicidality the long-way around, and it's a problem that doesn't get talked about.
ghawinriver.bsky.social
When people seek martyrdom, let's be real, it's not because they think it will actually help build a movement around them, it's because they, specifically, want to die and can't imagine a world in which we actually win, so they throw themselves with abandon and demand everyone else do the same.
ghawinriver.bsky.social
I do want to gently point out that a lot of the people saying you have to be willing to die--bluntly--are suicidal and don't think we can win. There's a difference between wanting to die, and being willing to die, and because of how desperate the situation is, folks miss that distinction now.
ghawinriver.bsky.social
That, and that we shouldn't allow known bad actors/paid provocatuers like Cole to dictate the frame and terms of discussion about detrans people, because the second we accept the underlying argument she makes and only dispute the evidence, we've already lost, right? More than I even knew.
ghawinriver.bsky.social
But the broader point I'm trying to get at here is that this whole "born this way" biological essentialism was never for us; it was a narrative told about us because the idea that being gay or trans is a right in and of itself was a bridge too far for cis liberals (and still is).
ghawinriver.bsky.social
This last one actually is relevant for the cultural moment, because "detransitioner" actually has a wide range of possible operations, as well. For instance, some metrics are purely medical (stopped taking hormones for health complications) whereas others require explicit cisgender identification.
ghawinriver.bsky.social
That is fair, and I apologize for doing the same sort of oversimplification I just decried. You're right, of course. Same principle applies to them, as well.
ghawinriver.bsky.social
The central claim of gender liberation is one of individual agency and freedom, that one's gender identity and expression need not be anchored to your chromosomes or your genitals, and that you can and should explore that space even if you ARE cisgender. No more, no less. But that scares libs.
ghawinriver.bsky.social
Particularly because the central claim of "transgenderism" is not, and never has been, that it is an innate, immutable trait since birth. That's cishet liberal bullshit they use to convince their alcoholic aunt why they shouldn't use slurs against their enby cousin.
ghawinriver.bsky.social
I reject this, and anyone operating in good conscience should also reject this, because the problem with conversion therapy is not that it was unscientific, it's that it's just plain evil. I mean hell, beating children to write with their right hands worked; still abuse!
ghawinriver.bsky.social
Accepting the frame AT ALL lets Cole, Project 2025, and everyone like them win, because it signals that all you gotta do to convince liberals that it's OK to not bother protecting human rights for trans people is convince them it's all elective and therefore not "real."
ghawinriver.bsky.social
But bluntly speaking, even if being gay or being trans WAS a choice with zero biological basis, conversion therapy would still be wrong, because coercive therapy in general is wrong! Even if you COULD have effective results for "ex-gays," it would STILL be immoral and cruel!
ghawinriver.bsky.social
Cishet liberals only actually tolerate gay people and trans people because they think we can't change. If they thought we could be "normal," they'd endorse conversion therapy in a millisecond. That's why they were swallowing Zucker's bullshit for decades. It told them what they wanted to hear.
ghawinriver.bsky.social
Also this just...plain isn't the case. First, conflating ex-gays with detransitioners writ large is just plain inaccurate. There are actually detransitioners, most of whom want nothing to do with Cole and her like; I've yet to see evidence of any actual ex-gays. The broader argument is what's wrong.
Reposted by Q. McLamore
neillewisjr.bsky.social
"If you’ve figured out your core principles, then they will guide you about what to do. Remember, you’re not just performing an idea, it’s your life. It’s who you are."
andyperfors.bsky.social
I'm a bit late to the game on this, but I finally read it and if you haven't done so, do check it out. It is a very thoughtfully kind (yet incisive) examination of where a lot of people on the left are right now, with Ezra Klein and Ta-Nehisi Coates serving as rhetorical poles of sorts.
You don't have to swallow frogs
Klein and Coates show that if you don't know what your core beliefs are, you're going to get played.
degenerateart.beehiiv.com
Reposted by Q. McLamore
brendannyhan.bsky.social
My new op-ed with @lkfazio.bsky.social:

Trump sent a 'compact' to our universities. They should reject this devil's bargain.
Any institution that yields to these broad and intrusive demands would forever be subservient to the whims of the government.
www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnb...
ghawinriver.bsky.social
A more accurate title would be, "25% of professors took a glorified lottery ticket we call a job application in the North and will leave the state if they get a good enough offer prospect to do so and have no other realistic plans to flee."
ghawinriver.bsky.social
"Considering" is also doing a lot of legwork here. Sure, I'm "considering" leaving the South, and leaving the country, in the same way I'm "considering" cozying up to the Innsmouth people and walking beneath the sea forever, because that's about as actionable for pretty much every American academic
sjjphd.bsky.social
Discussing this phenomenon w/ a group of profs. Someone morbidly joked, “& northern profs are fleeing the country.” The next person said…”even if we were all willing & able to abandon this place there are not enough jobs for us globally and the U.S. employs a huge # of international scholars too.”
‘Fear and hopelessness’: study finds one in four professors consider leaving US south
Survey by American Association of Professors shows nearly quarter of respondents are switching due to states’s politics
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by Q. McLamore
tevoelker.bsky.social
New paper out with @dasalgon.bsky.social: “Far-Right Agenda Setting: How the Far Right influences the Political Mainstream” doi.org/10.1017/S1475676525100066 #openaccess in @ejprjournal.bsky.social🧵
Abstract