Giorgio Monti
@gmonti.bsky.social
27 followers 21 following 25 posts
Professor of Competition Law, Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology and Society and Tilburg Law and Economics Center Eclectic, multidisciplinary lawyer; but mostly posting about competition and digital markets
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
gmonti.bsky.social
and also another episode of 'The EU overregulates while the US innovates.'
Reposted by Giorgio Monti
wavesblog.bsky.social
"“Around 75% of the new players benefiting from European regulation come from the United States,”" she said - a feature, a bug, something else 🤔?
gmonti.bsky.social
It seems to have been an ABA event, funding unclear from the website, program also hard to find
gmonti.bsky.social
And what is remarkable is that no 'thought leader' is saying much, while every step by Lina Kahn was criticised.
gmonti.bsky.social
Media Matters for America v FTC lnkd.in/e5Fzm8HT

In brief, FTC stifled freedom of expression. More specifically, the freedom of expression of a non-profit research center who 'has helped document instances of white nationalism, antisemitism and neo-Nazi rhetoric.'

FTC cast: see 8-10 and 40-42.
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
lnkd.in
gmonti.bsky.social
Given the complexity and pace of the modern economy, non-enforcement is the superior strategy lest we forego efficiency gains.
gmonti.bsky.social
The Division has reinstated a willingness to settle merger reviews with targeted and well-crafted consent decrees that meet the Executive’s goals such as eliminating DEI initiatives.
gmonti.bsky.social
America First Antitrust focuses on empowering American firms operate in markets, not enabling regulators and bureaucrats to rein in anticompetitive practices… We are unleashing the new American Golden Age through antitrust non-enforcement that removes regulatory burdens on firms.
gmonti.bsky.social
The Division will use this opportunity to continue its work to recalibrate and modernize the Federal approach to competition policy to suit the needs of the Executive.
gmonti.bsky.social
We are unleashing the new American Golden Age through antitrust non-enforcement that removes regulatory burdens on firms.
gmonti.bsky.social
The Division will use this opportunity to recalibrate the Federal approach to competition policy to suit the needs of the Executive.

America First Antitrust focuses on empowering American firms operate in markets, not enabling regulators and bureaucrats to rein in anticompetitive practices…
gmonti.bsky.social
Given the complexity and pace of the modern economy, non-enforcement is the superior strategy lest we forego efficiency gains.
gmonti.bsky.social
The Division has reinstated a willingness to settle merger reviews with targeted and well-crafted consent decrees that meet the Executive’s goals such as reducing DEI initiatives.
gmonti.bsky.social
This appeared on my feed just before a post asking 'what if international law did not exist?'
Well, it seems that now, in one country, all law, whatever source, has nearly ceased to exist.
adambonin.bsky.social
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in dissent, on the Court's ruling on universal injunctions and birthright citizenship:

"The Court’s decision to permit the Executive to violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued is an existential threat to the rule of law."
JUSTICE JACKSON, dissenting. I agree with every word of JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR’s dissent. I write separately to emphasize a key conceptual point: The Court’s decision to permit the Executive to violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued is an existential threat to the rule of law.
Reposted by Giorgio Monti
adambonin.bsky.social
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in dissent, on the Court's ruling on universal injunctions and birthright citizenship:

"The Court’s decision to permit the Executive to violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued is an existential threat to the rule of law."
JUSTICE JACKSON, dissenting. I agree with every word of JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR’s dissent. I write separately to emphasize a key conceptual point: The Court’s decision to permit the Executive to violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued is an existential threat to the rule of law.
gmonti.bsky.social
Would be nice to read a news story where the so-called Le Pen judgment (lesjours.fr/ressources/d...) was explained.
Noting: the number of defendants implicated; the clear motivations for the sentencing; the criminal and the civil claims.
The harm caused is palpable. Focus on this, please.
lesjours.fr
gmonti.bsky.social
This was a fun chat, thanks to the panellists for sharing their insights.

😂Funniest take: DMA is 1 year old, too soon to tell if it will be a footballer or... a lawyer!

👉Important take: is the balance between enforcement and regulatory dialogue right?

✏️CERRE's take: cerre.eu/publications...