LightNews LightNews
guysmiley1968.bsky.social
@guysmiley1968.bsky.social
38 followers 39 following 3 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted
pppgrifter.bsky.social
I would simply not care about Trump voters. They’re not worth anyone’s time. Fuck em
theatlantic.com The Atlantic @theatlantic.com · 21d
Josh Shapiro believes he is uniquely suited to win over Trump voters—but he’ll need to overcome distrust among some in his own party first, Tim Alberta reports: theatln.tc/mR9AHSG4
December 5, 2025 at 6:59 PM
Reposted
joshtpm.bsky.social
Rep. Lawler Fielded Sock Puppet Provocateur at Raucous Town Hall talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/rep-l...
Rep. Lawler Fielded Sock Puppet Provocateur at Raucous Town Hall
This is my official new favorite story ever. It’s from the Journal...
talkingpointsmemo.com
July 8, 2025 at 11:26 PM
Reposted
mjsdc.bsky.social
Read Jenner & Block's lawsuit challenging Trump's unconstitutional assault on their firm.👇 Very glad to see Jenner fighting back. They're represented by Cooley, which is taking a risk here too.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
CLAIMS FOR RELIEF COUNT I (Against All Defendants) Unconstitutional Retaliation in Violation of the First Amendment 140. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations set forth in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 141. The First Amendment “prohibits government officials from subjecting individuals to ‘retaliatory actions’ after the fact for having engaged in” First Amendment-protected conduct. Hous. Cmty. Coll. Sys. v. Wilson, 595 U.S. 468, 474 (2022) (quoting Nieves v. Bartlett, 587 U.S. 391, 398 (2019)). 142. The Order and Fact Sheet unlawfully retaliate against Jenner & Block because they single out and punish Jenner & Block for its protected speech, reflected in its advocacy for clients challenging policies of the current Administration. 143. The Order and Fact Sheet also unlawfully retaliate against Jenner & Block in response to the speech of a former partner who has criticized and investigated the President, and in response to Jenner’s association with that former partner. 144. This is not just protected speech, but “core political speech” and association receiving the First Amendment’s highest protections. FEC v. Cruz, 596 U.S. 289, 313 (2022); see Legal Servs. Corp. v. Velazquez, 531 U.S. 533, 546, 548-49 (2001) (First Amendment violated by laws that attempt to “draw lines around” those arguments that the government “finds unacceptable but which by their nature are within the province of the courts to consider”). Indeed, the Order does not even attempt to hide that it has targeted Jenner & Block for its protected activity: Section 1 invokes Jenner & Block’s “partisan representations to achieve political ends,” Ex. 7 (Jenner Order), § 1—a phrase synonymous with “pure political expression absolutely protected by the First Amendment.”
March 28, 2025 at 1:15 PM
guysmiley1968.bsky.social
Word from a principal in VA Beach: ICE agents picking up kids at bus stops. Panicked parents calling asking not to send kids home on the bus. This is the police state we live in now.
February 1, 2025 at 11:07 PM
guysmiley1968.bsky.social
It’s not Gluten Free January
January 25, 2025 at 1:36 PM