Nick Hagerty
@hagertynw.bsky.social
1.5K followers 430 following 60 posts
Environmental & resource economist, assistant professor at Montana State. Water, ag, land use, climate, development, research methods
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Nick Hagerty
cega-uc.bsky.social
💧 Small-scale irrigation supports farmer livelihoods but can strain groundwater resources. How do we strike a balance?

Join us on Oct 23 for a session on Balancing Small-Scale Irrigation Solutions with Ram Fishman & @hagertynw.bsky.social.

Register: go.cega.org/registerATAIwebinar
Reposted by Nick Hagerty
aereorg.bsky.social
📢 Out now in the September 2025 issue of #JAERE! 📢
"Industrial Water Pollution and Agricultural Production in India" by Nick Hagerty ( @hagertynw.bsky.social ) and Anshuman Tiwari.
Read it here: buff.ly/oAalYIW
📈📉 #Econsky
hagertynw.bsky.social
For people in Bozeman! We're voting on a ballot initiative this fall that sounds good but would cause some huge problems

(Precautionary disclaimer: we wrote this as private citizens, not representing our employer)

www.bozemandailychronicle.com/opinions/gue...
Kelsey Larson, Nick Hagerty & Justin Gallagher: WARD would hurt housing, environment
The WARD ballot initiative claims it will encourage sustainability and support affordable housing in Bozeman.
www.bozemandailychronicle.com
hagertynw.bsky.social
Cool, maybe, thanks! I hadn't seen this paper and will have to take a look (and it didn't exist when we wrote the paper...)
hagertynw.bsky.social
Last, industrial water pollution likely has many other costs to society. Our paper does not imply otherwise!
hagertynw.bsky.social
Why doesn’t some of the worst industrial water pollution in the world seem to hurt agriculture?

Our best explanations:
- a lot of crops are less exposed than you’d think
- pollution gets diluted pretty quickly
- some pollution actually helps crops
hagertynw.bsky.social
So: Here's how severely-polluting industrial clusters affect predicted crop yields. Downstream = positive distance = right side

You can see the damage, but it’s small (3%) and the conf. interval includes 0

Plus these are local effects that will decay further downstream
hagertynw.bsky.social
To solve problem 3 (what areas are exposed) we develop new methods to carefully define and map upstream/downstream hydrological relationships

Defining these relationships is trickier than you might think. We discuss 4 ways prior methods can go very wrong
hagertynw.bsky.social
This is hard because it’s the whole village, not individual plots with single crops

The result isn’t great as prediction (R2=0.25) but there’s meaningful signal as a proxy

AND our model is 4x better than just using NDVI, like many papers do
hagertynw.bsky.social
To solve problem 2 (low-res ag data) we predict village-level crop yields from satellite data, training a random forest on nationally representative survey data.
hagertynw.bsky.social
Industrial clusters coincide with a huge jump in river pollution of 300-600%. India’s government names and rates these clusters but doesn’t release public estimates of how polluting they are. We do
hagertynw.bsky.social
To solve problem 1 (bad pollution data) we look at India’s giant industrial clusters and just estimate the effect of being downstream of a cluster. The spatial RD is obvious in Delhi here
hagertynw.bsky.social
But 3 problems make this question hard to answer:
1. Pollution data is low quality
2. Ag data is low-resolution
3. Hard to know exactly what areas are exposed
hagertynw.bsky.social
India has some of the worst industrial water pollution in the world. We wanted to know how it affects agriculture, because it’s often highly exposed and lots of people depend on it
hagertynw.bsky.social
Out today in JAERE! We measure water pollution released at India's industrial clusters. Does it hurt agriculture? Surprisingly: Not by much

Come for how we published a paper of null results & with no regression tables

Stay for new ways to proxy for crop yields & map hydrological relationships

🧵
hagertynw.bsky.social
Do you think this is the relevant question? For whether I support radical tactics by elected officials on my side, it seems like what matters is whether I think elected officials on the other side are using radical tactics, not whether voters on the other side support them
Reposted by Nick Hagerty
aaronsojourner.org
🔥BLS Staff: "We will publish reliable data, no matter how inconvenient the results... Acting Commissioner is a respected career professional. There are no other political appointees at BLS... will remain accurate & nonpartisan... if that ever changes, the professionals will tell you." #StandWithBLS
“The Bureau of Labor Statistics must remain above politics. Our job is to deliver economic data guided by law and statistical practice — not partisan whim.

That’s why the firing of Commissioner Erika McEntarfer is so alarming. Dr. McEntarfer did nothing wrong. No serious observer claims otherwise. Commissioners don’t “cook” the numbers; they don’t even see them until after the estimates are complete. Dr. McEntarfer’s dismissal was unprecedented and she should be reinstated.

For decades, BLS Commissioners — Republican and Democrat alike — have been respected professionals. BLS data has been trusted because its methods are public, vetted, and transparent. BLS publishes its sources, publishes its methods, and its data revisions follow a set schedule. The public doesn’t have to *guess* whether the jobs numbers are real. 

So why was Dr. McEntarfer forced out? Not because of misconduct. Not because of bad data. The only people making that claim are President Trump and his allies, who offer no evidence — only lies, character assassination, and intimidation. Their real goal is clear: to discredit independent statistics, slash budgets, and bully federal workers into silence.

But BLS staff will not be intimidated. We will publish reliable data, no matter how inconvenient the results. Our now-Acting Commissioner is a respected career professional. There are no other political appointees at BLS. The numbers will remain accurate and nonpartisan. And if that ever changes, the professionals will tell you.”
hagertynw.bsky.social
AI can now do everything, which is just too tempting for even the most committed, intellectually curious students. I was probably as conscientious as they come and I certainly don't think I'd have been able to resist it
hagertynw.bsky.social
I don't like it but HIGH FREQUENCY, IN-PERSON assessments are the only way college students are going to learn anything this semester

www.nytimes.com/2025/08/26/o...
Opinion | Students Hate Them. Universities Need Them. The Only Real Solution to the A.I. Cheating Crisis.
www.nytimes.com
hagertynw.bsky.social
We are hiring at Montana State! Link in thread

If you aren't sure whether you fit the posted topic areas, please don't pre-screen yourself out, let our committee decide!

I'm not on the search committee but happy to answer any general questions
Demonstrated interest in scholarship relevant to commercial agriculture, applicable to commercial agriculture in Montana, especially in the following research areas: production economics, farm/ranch management, agricultural marketing, precision agriculture, energy economics, and financial risk management.
hagertynw.bsky.social
Another approach might be spatially rolling averages? I totally buy that there's a lot of preference heterogeneity, I just expected it to vary more gradually across neighboring counties. But maybe you have reason to think counties are an important locus of sorting!
hagertynw.bsky.social
Is that statistic for the mean coefficients you plot? I wonder if the year-specific coefficients are noisier - may make sense to shrink those original estimates before taking means
hagertynw.bsky.social
Super cool! This seems like a perfect place for some empirical Bayes shrinkage. It's not really plausible that alternating counties in the Great Plains are extremely risk averse and risk seeking right? They're probably just noisy estimates which you could regularize to make a much nicer map