Jonathan Heathcote
@heathcote.bsky.social
2.6K followers 660 following 29 posts
Economist. Macro, inequality, public finance, international finance, asset pricing, labor. https://www.jonathanheathcote.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Jonathan Heathcote
socampdi.bsky.social
🚨We are Hiring at the University of Western Ontario🚨

We have 3️⃣ tenure-track positions:
•2 Open-Field
•1 linked to our Masters in Financial Economics (open to various fields)

Come work with us in 🇨🇦! Share with your students!

📄 Open-Field uwo.ca/facultyrelat...
📄 MFE Position uwo.ca/facultyrelat...
uwo.ca
heathcote.bsky.social
Longer time series for perspective.
heathcote.bsky.social
Then we ask whether the observed path for investment is consistent with the required return to capital investment being equal, date by date, to the expected return estimated from the finance model. We find that it is, given a plausible path for expected productivity growth. 8/
heathcote.bsky.social
We compare the time series for expected returns from our finance model with a series for realized returns to capital estimated from our macro model (given time series for taxes, depreciation, labor’s share of value-added etc). The two track closely. 7/
heathcote.bsky.social
Why do we find this? Part of the explanation is that our macro-model consistent firm income measure — free cash flow — looks quite different to dividends paid. At low frequency, valuations and free cash flow clearly co-move, pointing to a link between the two.6/
heathcote.bsky.social
The paper’s first result is that our estimated asset pricing model interprets fluctuations in valuations quite differently. We find that fluctuations over the past 100 years mostly reflect fluctuations in long run expected free cash flow! (x in the plot below) 5/
heathcote.bsky.social
On top of that, conventional wisdom in finance is that volatility in valuations mostly reflects fluctuations in the expected return that firm owners require (rather than time variation in expected cash flow). If firm owners’ required returns are volatile, why is their capital invested so smooth? 4/
heathcote.bsky.social
Valuations are volatile, while the aggregate capital stock is smooth. That poses a challenge to reconciling macro and finance. 3/
heathcote.bsky.social
We study valuations of US corporations from 1929 onward using 2 models: an asset pricing model, and a stochastic growth model that incorporates factorless income. We fit these models to data from the Integrated Macroeconomic Accounts, focusing on free cash flow as a measure of income. 2/
heathcote.bsky.social
The housing supply is not fixed in the short run. There are lots of people who could rent out second homes, ADUs, or put property on AirBnb, if they felt it would be worthwhile financially.
heathcote.bsky.social
I suspect low US taxes and agglomeration effects are big drivers of US dynamism. With respect specifically to Finland, Nokia screwed up.
heathcote.bsky.social
They did have access to venture capital — ie some other rich people. But that seems to also exist to some extent in Scandinavia (I watched The Playlist!)
heathcote.bsky.social
@fatihguvenen.bsky.social is arguing that entrepreneurs need to have skin in the game (i.e they need wealth so they can have an equity stake). That makes sense But many of the richest Americans are self-made — they built big businesses without much initial wealth.
Reposted by Jonathan Heathcote
rohitlamba.bsky.social
Week 2: This week's theory paper in focus is a brilliant conceptual puzzle piece by Thomas & Worrall (1990). What are the implications of risk sharing/insurance provision over time when income is private? They have a surprising answer: it necessarily leads to long-term impoverishment.
Reposted by Jonathan Heathcote
bengolub.bsky.social
In economics, editors, referees, and authors often behave as if a published paper should reflect some kind of authoritative consensus.

As a result, valuable debate happens in secret, and the resulting paper is an opaque compromise with anonymous co-authors called referees.

1/
heathcote.bsky.social
I don’t quite understand the table. If I look at highly selective colleges, enrollment for every sub-group declined by more than enrollment for all. Perhaps there is a ‘did not declare race’ group, whose enrollment rose.
Reposted by Jonathan Heathcote
florianscheuer.bsky.social
Submit your papers to the next @cepr.org Public Economics Annual Symposium, taking place in Cologne on June 5-6, 2025. Co-organized with @sigginho.bsky.social and Johannes Spinnewijn, keynotes by Cecile Gaubert and @omzidar.bsky.social!

cepr.org/events/cepr-...
CEPR Public Economics Annual Symposium 2025
PDF document / 207.07 KB
cepr.org