pictures of pelicans
@hopefulllama.bsky.social
adhering to gramsci-luckacs-kroc thought
big collars and big knots high key goated no cap
December 14, 2025 at 3:48 PM
big collars and big knots high key goated no cap
you joke; this was the labour party platform.
November 29, 2025 at 6:31 PM
you joke; this was the labour party platform.
ive already spent $500 on helldude for ny 08 stickers, plz dont burn me on this
November 18, 2025 at 12:30 AM
ive already spent $500 on helldude for ny 08 stickers, plz dont burn me on this
the time has come to stop taking anthony horowitz seriously; if indeed there ever was a time when it made sense to do so. Fundamentally silly person.
November 11, 2025 at 3:33 PM
the time has come to stop taking anthony horowitz seriously; if indeed there ever was a time when it made sense to do so. Fundamentally silly person.
how does Trump endorsing cuomo factor into your fantasies?
November 3, 2025 at 8:59 PM
how does Trump endorsing cuomo factor into your fantasies?
what are we meant to do about emissions from cars Matt? wish real hard?
and idk i'm against the death penalty? it's wrong? I don't think it's the thing that's making people vote Republican?
and idk i'm against the death penalty? it's wrong? I don't think it's the thing that's making people vote Republican?
October 29, 2025 at 9:46 PM
what are we meant to do about emissions from cars Matt? wish real hard?
and idk i'm against the death penalty? it's wrong? I don't think it's the thing that's making people vote Republican?
and idk i'm against the death penalty? it's wrong? I don't think it's the thing that's making people vote Republican?
Reposted by pictures of pelicans
Reading this, I'm seeing something I call the swerve
there are people, usually with a high level of in-born privilege, who *will not see certain things.* They just *won't.* And if you put it in front of their faces they will do ANYTHING to insist it's not there.
Klein keeps swerving.
there are people, usually with a high level of in-born privilege, who *will not see certain things.* They just *won't.* And if you put it in front of their faces they will do ANYTHING to insist it's not there.
Klein keeps swerving.
September 28, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Reading this, I'm seeing something I call the swerve
there are people, usually with a high level of in-born privilege, who *will not see certain things.* They just *won't.* And if you put it in front of their faces they will do ANYTHING to insist it's not there.
Klein keeps swerving.
there are people, usually with a high level of in-born privilege, who *will not see certain things.* They just *won't.* And if you put it in front of their faces they will do ANYTHING to insist it's not there.
Klein keeps swerving.
while HI probably is fine in the recording case, in more charged cases, especially involving incorporated fed con rights, they are in a bad spot—unless they delegitimize SCOTUS. bc of the broad nature of incorp rights you can create rights conflicts and then go the wrong way w them (ie abortion)
September 25, 2025 at 6:09 PM
while HI probably is fine in the recording case, in more charged cases, especially involving incorporated fed con rights, they are in a bad spot—unless they delegitimize SCOTUS. bc of the broad nature of incorp rights you can create rights conflicts and then go the wrong way w them (ie abortion)
right, but in this piece we see HI going against Bruen with a guns case—where the assertion of state power is disfavored by scotus, but ok by the state court, and is an incorporated constitutional right then you create the possibility of conflict. Combined with innovations on both sides, trouble!
September 25, 2025 at 6:05 PM
right, but in this piece we see HI going against Bruen with a guns case—where the assertion of state power is disfavored by scotus, but ok by the state court, and is an incorporated constitutional right then you create the possibility of conflict. Combined with innovations on both sides, trouble!
didn't scotus blow up a one-way ratchet case a couple of years ago? I think it was out of WA?
more broadly though, if state courts get used to getting big mad at scotus then that could create a) normative anti-fed impetus, b) rulings that contradict scotus on fed law.
more broadly though, if state courts get used to getting big mad at scotus then that could create a) normative anti-fed impetus, b) rulings that contradict scotus on fed law.
September 25, 2025 at 5:40 PM
didn't scotus blow up a one-way ratchet case a couple of years ago? I think it was out of WA?
more broadly though, if state courts get used to getting big mad at scotus then that could create a) normative anti-fed impetus, b) rulings that contradict scotus on fed law.
more broadly though, if state courts get used to getting big mad at scotus then that could create a) normative anti-fed impetus, b) rulings that contradict scotus on fed law.
bro scotus gets final say on questions of state law if they think that state law runs contrary to the federal constitution or is otherwise preempted by federal law LMAO.
September 25, 2025 at 5:17 PM
bro scotus gets final say on questions of state law if they think that state law runs contrary to the federal constitution or is otherwise preempted by federal law LMAO.
fwiw I don’t agree that this undermines the integrity of the show and while it is very silly it’s not “whenever the plot needs him to be he is”—both seldons exist within very limited contexts pursuing concrete goals by explicable and understandable means which creates drama. Its good!
September 6, 2025 at 4:01 PM
fwiw I don’t agree that this undermines the integrity of the show and while it is very silly it’s not “whenever the plot needs him to be he is”—both seldons exist within very limited contexts pursuing concrete goals by explicable and understandable means which creates drama. Its good!
no no no its very simple he was alive, and then he was killed, and then his digital consciousness was downloaded into a real body, but also he had another version of himself in a vault who did not know of the other seldon who is now dead because his biological body died.
September 6, 2025 at 3:57 PM
no no no its very simple he was alive, and then he was killed, and then his digital consciousness was downloaded into a real body, but also he had another version of himself in a vault who did not know of the other seldon who is now dead because his biological body died.
and fwiw I think you missed the impact the Floyd murder has on Mike and which drives Joe’s distrust in him.
I share your anxiety that the film is ultimately nihilistic or bad, but I don’t think this reading of the film is fair or supported by its text.
I share your anxiety that the film is ultimately nihilistic or bad, but I don’t think this reading of the film is fair or supported by its text.
July 23, 2025 at 5:38 PM
and fwiw I think you missed the impact the Floyd murder has on Mike and which drives Joe’s distrust in him.
I share your anxiety that the film is ultimately nihilistic or bad, but I don’t think this reading of the film is fair or supported by its text.
I share your anxiety that the film is ultimately nihilistic or bad, but I don’t think this reading of the film is fair or supported by its text.
I see where you’re coming from—but this film HATES Joe so much it includes a lengthy epilogue that clearly states just how awful a punishment he receives as a consequence if his actions. And it is a Divine punishment—he is not punished by law enforcement! but by harsh and perverse suffering.
July 23, 2025 at 5:36 PM
I see where you’re coming from—but this film HATES Joe so much it includes a lengthy epilogue that clearly states just how awful a punishment he receives as a consequence if his actions. And it is a Divine punishment—he is not punished by law enforcement! but by harsh and perverse suffering.
oh, uh, sorry? did not get that, my bad? I guess?
July 12, 2025 at 6:56 PM
oh, uh, sorry? did not get that, my bad? I guess?
How was trying to win an internal party election not going through the official channels on intra party disagreement?
July 12, 2025 at 6:53 PM
How was trying to win an internal party election not going through the official channels on intra party disagreement?
they uh they lost voteshare at the last GE. And this guy was talking about how this new party would fracture the coalition at the NEXT election. so.
July 4, 2025 at 1:57 PM
they uh they lost voteshare at the last GE. And this guy was talking about how this new party would fracture the coalition at the NEXT election. so.
and they are fucking bigots to boot. despair is appropriate—but blaming corbyn both overstates his importance and lets this destitute failure of a ministry off the hook.
July 3, 2025 at 9:24 PM
and they are fucking bigots to boot. despair is appropriate—but blaming corbyn both overstates his importance and lets this destitute failure of a ministry off the hook.
yeah, we have some guy in no 10 with a red rosette and a bunch of true blue ideas. What the hell kind of lab govt comes in with a storming majority and then staffs downing st w “blue labour” types who just want to reinstall the failed policies of the last fifteen years but “competently”.
July 3, 2025 at 9:23 PM
yeah, we have some guy in no 10 with a red rosette and a bunch of true blue ideas. What the hell kind of lab govt comes in with a storming majority and then staffs downing st w “blue labour” types who just want to reinstall the failed policies of the last fifteen years but “competently”.
bro, who got expelled from which party again? bro maybe idk labour should defeat their opponents through building a broad and popular coalition? Instead of bitching about being outcompeted in a niche?
July 3, 2025 at 8:28 PM
bro, who got expelled from which party again? bro maybe idk labour should defeat their opponents through building a broad and popular coalition? Instead of bitching about being outcompeted in a niche?
right, I think I’ve wasted enough of my time on this earth looking thru ari cohn v lizard and I don’t see it so uh fuck you I guess.
And can I say you’ve been really weirdly defensive throughout. Lizard said you’re right on the law like twice lmao. And yet!
And can I say you’ve been really weirdly defensive throughout. Lizard said you’re right on the law like twice lmao. And yet!
June 27, 2025 at 3:41 AM
right, I think I’ve wasted enough of my time on this earth looking thru ari cohn v lizard and I don’t see it so uh fuck you I guess.
And can I say you’ve been really weirdly defensive throughout. Lizard said you’re right on the law like twice lmao. And yet!
And can I say you’ve been really weirdly defensive throughout. Lizard said you’re right on the law like twice lmao. And yet!
ari, that’s an intellectually dishonest equivalence. Just stand on your (possibly defensible) ground here my guy, this is beneath you—and if you can’t see how then you may have bigger problems.
June 27, 2025 at 3:31 AM
ari, that’s an intellectually dishonest equivalence. Just stand on your (possibly defensible) ground here my guy, this is beneath you—and if you can’t see how then you may have bigger problems.
the general worry is that these guys’ whole project is getting stuff done in a way that may not actually achieve social justice, but in whatever way they think is best—the new philosopher kings who may not have the patience to work with unions or other coalition members.
June 26, 2025 at 10:58 PM
the general worry is that these guys’ whole project is getting stuff done in a way that may not actually achieve social justice, but in whatever way they think is best—the new philosopher kings who may not have the patience to work with unions or other coalition members.