Your opening tweet is a clearly causal claim that you've repeated, which immediately doesn't stand up to scrutiny. This is a ubiquitous critique of this type of work.
Your opening tweet is a clearly causal claim that you've repeated, which immediately doesn't stand up to scrutiny. This is a ubiquitous critique of this type of work.
[paraphrased]
www.bmj.com/content/390/...
[paraphrased]
www.bmj.com/content/390/...