JARED GOFF
icedbrew2.bsky.social
JARED GOFF
@icedbrew2.bsky.social
Michigan born, West Virginia raised, back in the land of Jared Goff. Go Herd
Yes I went to one, I know. But if they don’t get a chance to dance, then fuck the P4.
December 21, 2025 at 1:58 AM
Hammer DAHN
December 21, 2025 at 1:49 AM
To imply bill was being creepy.
December 21, 2025 at 1:47 AM
Then why haven’t they done it?
December 21, 2025 at 1:35 AM
I wouldn’t think so. Look at where MJ is looking. Clinton looks like he’s looking that way too. Ross is harder to tell and even if it wasn’t simultaneous it could have been “look here” and a second later “look here” from another photographer.
December 21, 2025 at 1:35 AM
Yeah I’m not holding out hope for the division, I’d rather have our destiny in our hands. Get in, survive and advance. I think the Rams are the only team in the league that can score with us on a good day, and I’m fine taking that chance on the road.
December 21, 2025 at 1:33 AM
The minors were censored to imply Clinton was with underage girls. They think their followers are too stupid or too brainwashed to accept the truth.
December 21, 2025 at 1:31 AM
Because they aren’t the same photo.
December 21, 2025 at 1:30 AM
If they don’t want the G5 to have a chance, then break off. Let’s see how popular it is when mid tier SEC and Big Ten teams have 4-8 seasons instead of 7 or 8 wins.
December 20, 2025 at 11:52 PM
That’s not the picture that publicly exists. It’s one taken at the same time but to the left of the original photographer (unless they used AI.)
December 20, 2025 at 11:28 PM
If it was a plant…they’d have just used the original instead. This second pic exists somewhere (unless AI, but let’s avoid that rabbit hole for now.)
December 20, 2025 at 11:20 PM
questions are:

Who took it?
Why was it included?

Could it have been a plant? Sure. But if so, why not use the original? This photo came from somewhere. And the most logical conclusion is yeah, Epstein had it.
December 20, 2025 at 11:19 PM
It’s not the same picture. They were taken at pretty much the same time, yes. But if the implication is that it’s a plant, the there is no evidence of that. It was likely released because of MJ and the redactions (MAGA will assume they were victims and not MJ and Ross’s kids.)

The correct…
December 20, 2025 at 11:19 PM
Now that is a valid question. But the implication that it’s a plant takes away from that, because it potentially erroneously answers that question.

The pics were obviously taken at basically the same time. I’d be curious to know who took it. That could lead you to the why.
December 20, 2025 at 11:16 PM
Meidas’s post is false, too. It’s left wing gaslighting and have though beneath them.
December 20, 2025 at 10:58 PM
Take this down. Seriously. It’s false and it’s distracting.
December 20, 2025 at 10:55 PM
Because of Meidas nobody is focusing on the two actual issues: the bullshit implication of the redaction, and who took the picture.
December 20, 2025 at 10:55 PM
Because there is zero evidence they did.
December 20, 2025 at 10:54 PM
Do you think the DOJ knew the Getty pic existed?

They used it to redact the kids to make Clinton look bad, simple as that.
December 20, 2025 at 10:54 PM
Indiana and OSU meet for the title, headline: Big Ten Loses National Championship!
December 20, 2025 at 8:44 PM