To me the philosophy of section 230 and the DSA don't seem that different. The big ones seems to be that DSA tries to enforce proactive moderation of content, which (as long as it's done well) seems like a positive to me?

Sure, that is a part of the reason. Another big part is the existence of a large, single-language market. Of course there are a lot of other reasons too

True. I know it comes as a shock, but we agree that censorship is not good. However, completely unmoderated speech is also not good. There's a middleground somewhere that can be found.

Surely going purely for profit can't be the best approach to something as societally important as social media. It's already apparent what this does to content.

Are purchases made using Audible's free monthly credit counted the same as other purchases, or do authors see an even smaller payout from those?

Alternatively, you can modify this code directly in PyCafe:
py.cafe/alonsosilvaa...
Big shoutout to @maartenbreddels.bsky.social and @sophiamyang.bsky.social for all the help with this cookbook! 😊

My biggest hurdle has always been "what do I put on it". I feel like it's much easier to have social media with (almost) no content than a website with the same.

TL;DR: