🔞inchide🔞
@inchide.bsky.social
Schadenfreude TF
i.e., people that get TFed into female anthro (who still keep their hair and keep a familiar look to their original human form) in a surprising/reluctant way and having to deal with all the inconveniences that stem from this.
i.e., people that get TFed into female anthro (who still keep their hair and keep a familiar look to their original human form) in a surprising/reluctant way and having to deal with all the inconveniences that stem from this.
Reposted by 🔞inchide🔞
I know some have been a little unnerved at the aggressive following and noisemaking tactics of the observers. What they don’t realize is that it’s necessitated by what ICE is doing. You have seconds and you need as many eyes on them as possible, and as many people trying to get key info as possible.
January 14, 2026 at 2:41 PM
I know some have been a little unnerved at the aggressive following and noisemaking tactics of the observers. What they don’t realize is that it’s necessitated by what ICE is doing. You have seconds and you need as many eyes on them as possible, and as many people trying to get key info as possible.
Not sure where else to ask, but what is the IP situation for his comic? Can it be legacy-ed like Nancy or The Phantom, or is it more of a Stan Lee situation with newspaper Spider-Man?
January 14, 2026 at 6:48 AM
Not sure where else to ask, but what is the IP situation for his comic? Can it be legacy-ed like Nancy or The Phantom, or is it more of a Stan Lee situation with newspaper Spider-Man?
Reposted by 🔞inchide🔞
i’m sorry but you can’t just make joe manchin types not exist or matter by fiat. the radical republicans had to deal with a conservative wing of the party during reconstruction. even FDR had to play ball with a bunch of degenerate segregationists. bsky.app/profile/shoe...
we could have higher standards for the kind of society we want to live in orrrrrrr we could continue to vote for the same oafs and ogres who need to be coddled and bribed into not killing all of us for a couple years. and we love the ogres so,
on ramps are important. it is how we got joe manchin to vote for a climate bill, by calling it “the inflation reduction act”
January 12, 2026 at 5:32 PM
i’m sorry but you can’t just make joe manchin types not exist or matter by fiat. the radical republicans had to deal with a conservative wing of the party during reconstruction. even FDR had to play ball with a bunch of degenerate segregationists. bsky.app/profile/shoe...
Reposted by 🔞inchide🔞
doing war crimes and shattering the NATO consensus because of the fucking mercator projection
January 11, 2026 at 5:04 AM
doing war crimes and shattering the NATO consensus because of the fucking mercator projection
J'hésitais à sélectionner "enfreint les lois" car c'est les conditions d'utilisation et les règles imposées par gofundme plutôt que les loi qui sont enfreintes.
"la cagnote inclut des informations inexactes" me semble donc plus exacte. Merci.
"la cagnote inclut des informations inexactes" me semble donc plus exacte. Merci.
January 11, 2026 at 9:09 PM
J'hésitais à sélectionner "enfreint les lois" car c'est les conditions d'utilisation et les règles imposées par gofundme plutôt que les loi qui sont enfreintes.
"la cagnote inclut des informations inexactes" me semble donc plus exacte. Merci.
"la cagnote inclut des informations inexactes" me semble donc plus exacte. Merci.
The "please describe your concern" rolling menu. I don't have the option you say to pick for the French version of the site.
January 11, 2026 at 5:40 PM
The "please describe your concern" rolling menu. I don't have the option you say to pick for the French version of the site.
I have the French version of it, and for the last part, it doesn't have that "funding for murder litigations" option.
January 11, 2026 at 4:35 PM
I have the French version of it, and for the last part, it doesn't have that "funding for murder litigations" option.
"Ah, so he walked back his statement"
Walking back imply that he would have made such statement int he first place, which you failed to prove in the first time
No, pointing out he said Palestinians are right to hat the USA for the genocide it has caused in the same breath as "fuck Trump" isn't that
Walking back imply that he would have made such statement int he first place, which you failed to prove in the first time
No, pointing out he said Palestinians are right to hat the USA for the genocide it has caused in the same breath as "fuck Trump" isn't that
January 11, 2026 at 4:12 PM
"Ah, so he walked back his statement"
Walking back imply that he would have made such statement int he first place, which you failed to prove in the first time
No, pointing out he said Palestinians are right to hat the USA for the genocide it has caused in the same breath as "fuck Trump" isn't that
Walking back imply that he would have made such statement int he first place, which you failed to prove in the first time
No, pointing out he said Palestinians are right to hat the USA for the genocide it has caused in the same breath as "fuck Trump" isn't that
My personal "likings" don't even start to factor into this.
Explaining why it is incompatible with what is actually being said is not "dismissing". The only intellectual dishonesty I see is you brushing over the argument actually made.
Also, oh, look:
Explaining why it is incompatible with what is actually being said is not "dismissing". The only intellectual dishonesty I see is you brushing over the argument actually made.
Also, oh, look:
January 11, 2026 at 4:08 PM
My personal "likings" don't even start to factor into this.
Explaining why it is incompatible with what is actually being said is not "dismissing". The only intellectual dishonesty I see is you brushing over the argument actually made.
Also, oh, look:
Explaining why it is incompatible with what is actually being said is not "dismissing". The only intellectual dishonesty I see is you brushing over the argument actually made.
Also, oh, look:
"a racist little piece of shit"
Proof?
And I read it all. What you fail to understand is that your linking argument doesn't allow for interpretation that are completely incompatible with the first part.
bsky.app/profile/pale...
Proof?
And I read it all. What you fail to understand is that your linking argument doesn't allow for interpretation that are completely incompatible with the first part.
bsky.app/profile/pale...
January 11, 2026 at 4:01 PM
"a racist little piece of shit"
Proof?
And I read it all. What you fail to understand is that your linking argument doesn't allow for interpretation that are completely incompatible with the first part.
bsky.app/profile/pale...
Proof?
And I read it all. What you fail to understand is that your linking argument doesn't allow for interpretation that are completely incompatible with the first part.
bsky.app/profile/pale...
Seeing you are concluding he is blaming Palestinians for Trump, I'd say you are the one who lack reading comprehension. There is no interpretations where you can conclude this.
You have spent days hating on a guy for "reasons" that only exist in your head. That isn't healthy.
You have spent days hating on a guy for "reasons" that only exist in your head. That isn't healthy.
January 11, 2026 at 3:55 PM
Seeing you are concluding he is blaming Palestinians for Trump, I'd say you are the one who lack reading comprehension. There is no interpretations where you can conclude this.
You have spent days hating on a guy for "reasons" that only exist in your head. That isn't healthy.
You have spent days hating on a guy for "reasons" that only exist in your head. That isn't healthy.