Dr. Jacquelyn Schneider
@jackieschneider.bsky.social
1.4K followers 270 following 68 posts
Hoover Fellow, Director Wargaming and Crisis Simulation Initiative, Stanford University. Research on international security, emerging technology, wargames. Views are my own.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
jackieschneider.bsky.social
With interviews featuring Leon Panetta, Frank Kendall, Michael A. Brown, @spettyjohn.bsky.social, Paul Scharre, @mchorowitz.bsky.social @aaronbateman.bsky.social, @michaelkofman.bsky.social, Kate Epstein, Thomas G. Mahnken, Benjamin Jensen, Jack Shanahan, James Roche and many more
jackieschneider.bsky.social
#autonomy #unmanned #ukraine #iran #mines #drones #missile #china #military #innovation #militaryinnovation
jackieschneider.bsky.social
Mine and Julia Macdonald's new podcast on autonomy--from mines to missiles to drones--is now available! Follow the people behind America's unmanned arsenal from the revolutionary war to Afghanistan, Ukraine, and looking to the future.
www.hoover.org/research/epi...
Episode 1: The Hand Behind Unmanned – America’s Quest For Autonomous War
What are unmanned weapons and where did America’s quest for autonomy begin?
www.hoover.org
jackieschneider.bsky.social
Wow. This office played such a large role in modern US military thought. Check out our book to understand how they influenced multiple generations on the future of war.

www.defense.gov/News/Release...
jackieschneider.bsky.social
They forgot to include our grant in this announcement. “Deterrence in Space- Integrated or Entangled? A wargaming approach.”
jaylyall.bsky.social
Look, you don't need me to tell this is stupid, short-sighted, and just plain intellectualism run amok, but I'm going to do it anyways. And the projected "savings" of $30 million dollars? It's a Pentagon rounding error. We're about to rediscover that ignorance is costly.
Pentagon Culls Social Science Research, Prioritizes Fiscal Responsibility and Technologies
The Office of the Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering is scrapping its social science research portfolio as part of a broader effort to ensure fiscal responsibility and prioritize
www.defense.gov
jackieschneider.bsky.social
The official Hand Behind Unmanned book launch is coming to DC Mar 26th. Join us at the Hoover office at 5:30 for a discussion moderated by Michael Horowitz followed by reception. And we’ll be announcing a new project w/1st access to those at the launch! lp.constantcontactpages.com/ev/reg/6dr76...
jackieschneider.bsky.social
Big thanks to Middlebury for having me this afternoon to talk The Hand Behind Unmanned this afternoon!
jackieschneider.bsky.social
Trumps DOD listed one way attack/attritable systems as a top priority. But what are the politics behind these technologies? Check out our discussion @stanfordcisac.bsky.social yesterday on my new book with Julia Macdonald.
youtu.be/pUId7_8qLg4?...
jackieschneider.bsky.social
Want to know more about the politics behind why we buy some unmanned weapons and not others? I'll be discussing my new book with Julia Macdonald @stanfordcisac.bsky.social at 12PT. Join us in person if you're in the bay area or virtually here:

cisac.fsi.stanford.edu/events/hand-...
jackieschneider.bsky.social
4) Look not just at outcomes of games, but why they occurred. It's the why that is the real value-add of wargames. And if you want to know the why, then you need to not only read the after action report but the raw data, player insights, and exit interiews/surveys.
jackieschneider.bsky.social
3) Games can never model how effective a weapon is. That's what testing, experimentation, modeling, and exercising is for. Games can show how humans, organizations, campaigns change based on assumptions we put into about weapons capabilities.
jackieschneider.bsky.social
2) One wargame is never enough proof. Look across games, run by different organizations, played by different players, and with different assumptions about adversaries, weapons capabilities, and outcomes.
jackieschneider.bsky.social
1) Be wary of wargames that "validate" programs services have already been lobbying hard for. That's not to say that the wargame doesn't support the need for those games, but that you need to be extra careful at looking at the rules, players, and scenarios used to prove the system.
jackieschneider.bsky.social
And sometimes, done appropriately, validating and invalidating programs and weapons systems is exactly what wargames do. But often games don't tell the whole story behind buying and adopting the right technology. Here’s my take on using games to buy defense tech.
jackieschneider.bsky.social
On Friday Secretary of Defense Hegseth warned that, "There's a lot of programs around here that we’ve spent a lot of money on that, when you actually wargame it, don't have the impact you want them to." When he said that, we probably all had a favorite system (or two) that came to mind. ;) 🧵