Jameel Jaffer
@jameeljaffer.bsky.social
36K followers 860 following 1.2K posts
Director, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University; Exec Editor, Just Security; former ACLU. knightcolumbia.org.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
It was incredibly moving to hear Prof Nickel and other non-citizen professors testify in court about the ways in which the arrests and deportations of students had affected them and their colleagues. So grateful to them for their integrity and courage. www.thecrimson.com/article/2025...
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
Of course, it's an even bigger deal that the President is in fact authorizing these murders.
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
It's a pretty big deal that the NYC Bar Association--one of the most prominent and respected bar associations in the country--is accusing the President of ordering the "unlawful summary execution," i.e. murder--of civilians in violation of US and international law. www.nycbar.org/press-releas...
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
This is the third amicus brief we've filed in this case!
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
The DC Circuit is set to consider whether Trump violated the First Amendment by expelling the Associated Press from the White House press pool. @knightcolumbia.org's brief, just filed. knightcolumbia.org/content/knig...
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
"When faced with actual, explicit, documented government censorship—the kind they’ve been breathlessly warning about for years—they have nothing to say. Because this censorship serves their agenda, targets their enemies, and advances their political goals." www.techdirt.com/2025/10/03/d...
DOJ Demands Removal Of ICEBlock App; Why Are The ‘Free Speech Warriors’ Suddenly So Quiet?
For years now, the MAGA crowd has been absolutely convinced that the Biden administration engaged in the most egregious censorship campaign in American history. They’ve waved around the Murth…
www.techdirt.com
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
Don’t believe anyone who tells you that intelligence shows anything “without a doubt,” but even if the intelligence was water-tight, this strike was still murder. No law permits the deliberate, premeditated killing of civilians.
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
Proposed reply:

Dear Secretary McMahon,

Our offer is this: Nothing. Not even the fee for the gaming license, which we would appreciate if you’d put up personally.

Sincerely,

Universities
jswatz.bsky.social
“No self-respecting university could ever accept something like this,” said Lee Bollinger, a First Amendment scholar and former Columbia University president. “Trying to protect conservative ideas against being ‘belittled’ — that’s about as violative of the First Amendment interests as you can get.”
Colleges weigh whether to sign onto Trump plan or forgo federal benefits
A new proposal from the Trump administration would give colleges funding advantages if they adopt conservative priorities.
www.washingtonpost.com
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
This is an accurate, informative headline, unlike the ones atop some of the other news stories on this topic. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
There's always going to be disagreement about universities' admissions, hiring, and curricular decisions. But can we all agree that these decisions should be made by universities, not the government? (Apparently not.) Good essay here from Erwin Chemerinsky. www.nytimes.com/2025/10/02/o...
Opinion | Trump’s ‘Compact’ With Universities Is Just Extortion
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Jameel Jaffer
fishkin.bsky.social
The "compact" is a threat, with the administration explicitly stating that it plans to disfavor universities that don't sign in areas from foreign student visas, student loans, federal contracts as well as grants, and even tax [501(c)(3)] status.

It's a maximalist plan of 1st Amendment violation.
www.washingtonexaminer.com
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
Never before in our history have such small people been in charge of such big things.
parkermolloy.com
With news that Bari Weiss is going to be the new EIC at CBS News, I wanted to reup this piece I wrote 6 years ago about how she and Bret Stephens helped turn NYT into a moral panic factory www.mediamatters.org/new-york-tim...
How Bret Stephens and Bari Weiss have taken the NY Times’ campus concern trolling to new heights in just 2 years
www.mediamatters.org
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
A foolish neutrality is the hobgoblin of little minds.
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
Just noting that a university that signed this compact would be agreeing to gut clinics and institutes like, say, the Knight Institute, whose mandate is to promote free speech and press freedom. What would it even mean for us to be “neutral”?
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
A series of short posts from leading scholars about the constraints the First Amendment imposes on the government's authority to impose conditions on federal funding. Seems relevant! This is a @knightcolumbia.org series from earlier this year. knightcolumbia.org/research/fed...
Federal Funding and the First Amendment
knightcolumbia.org
Reposted by Jameel Jaffer
Reposted by Jameel Jaffer
vanhollen.senate.gov
This Reagan-appointed judge is right: Trump’s effort to deport people for speech he dislikes is a “full-throated assault on the First Amendment” — and puts ALL our rights at risk.

Our democracy depends on the courts and ALL OF US standing strong against Trump’s authoritarianism.
‘Full-throated assault on the First Amendment’: Judge rips into Trump over attempts to deport pro-Palestinian academics | CNN Politics
A federal judge on Tuesday delivered an extraordinary 161-page rebuke of President Donald Trump, ruling that the administration impermissibly chilled the protected political speech of university profe...
www.cnn.com
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
Judge Young's opinion is resonating with a lot of people. A student wrote to me: "Every once in a while, you read an opinion that gives you heart and reaffirms your faith in the law and in the profession of lawyering and, for me, this is one of those cases." knightcolumbia.org/documents/ah...
Reposted by Jameel Jaffer
veenadubal.bsky.social
WE WON: "This case -– perhaps the most important ever to fall w/in..this district court squarely presents the issue whether non-citizens lawfully present here in US..have the same free speech rights as the rest of us. The Court answers this Constitutional question unequivocally “yes, they do.”"
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
Very proud of my colleagues right now--especially @ramyakrishnan.bsky.social and @alexabdo.bsky.social. But we could not have got this far without the superb trial lawyers at Sher Tremonte. Grateful to them for all of the time and energy they put into this case. www.nytimes.com/2025/09/30/u...
Judge Rules Trump Unlawfully Targeted Noncitizens Over Pro-Palestinian Speech
www.nytimes.com
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
Federal court: DHS took agents away from national security investigations in order to arrest students for criticizing Israel, participating in pro-Palestinian protests, publishing op-eds calling for divestment.
emptywheel.bsky.social
Judge Young describes how DHS pulled people from actual NatSec jobs to look thru all students Canary targeted, just like people have been pulled to arrest grannies & review Epstein files (though notes "The Court takes no position as to the Public Officials’ prioritization of HSI’s resources")
Due to the workload, the requirement to review all 5,000
individuals on the Canary Mission Website, the assembly of the
Tiger Team required analysts be taken off of the
“Counterintelligence Unit, the Counterterrorism Intelligence
Unit, from the Cyber Intelligence Unit, from the Global Trade
Intelligence Unit, from all different parts of HSI
intelligence.” Trial Tr. vol. II, 106:16-21, Jul. 9, 2025.15
15 According to AD Hatch, the Tiger Team was needed because
“the normal unit or section or group of analysts . . . operating
in [the] normal organizational construct couldn’t handle that
workload.” Id. 111:3-5. When asked about deadlines, AD Hatch
responded, “We are an organization or an agency that, um, in a
world where . . . taking months to do things is not acceptable.
So, yeah, it -- we were not -- I was not going to be allowed to
say we've got 5 -- well you know a small number of analysts on
this, it's going to take them 6 months to get through 5,000
names. I was not given a deadline. But I knew from how we were organized and how we worked that we needed to work through this
expeditiously.” Id. 111:10-18. The Court takes no position as
to the Public Officials’ prioritization of HSI’s resources in
this manner.