Jane MIgliara Brigham
banner
jane.theneedlenews.com
Jane MIgliara Brigham
@jane.theneedlenews.com
Bylines at @theneedlenews.com https://theneedlenews.com/
The Internet's Foremost Transsexual Nationalist

Signal: Janethebane.40

Support my work here: https://theneedlenews.com/membership/

Likes and reposts =/= endorsement
And it hit number 1
January 17, 2026 at 2:59 AM
The FBI letter story is already our third biggest story of the past month.
January 17, 2026 at 2:35 AM
My Latest: Rumors of FBI letters threatening trans public figures center on an AI-generated document
| theneedle.news/eyb_vBY7c
January 17, 2026 at 12:01 AM
lawyer says this is a categorical ban, not a de facto ban
January 13, 2026 at 6:18 PM
Roberts argues against the idea that we should not be defining sex. lawyers counters that congress did not have to define race to prohibit racial discrimination.
January 13, 2026 at 6:14 PM
lawyer says that discrimination against feminine presentation is de facto sex discrimination.
January 13, 2026 at 6:10 PM
Kavanaugh asks whether states have leeway to define sex in their own proceedings. Lawyer says that doesn't matter, and that sex should not be defined.
January 13, 2026 at 6:08 PM
Kavanaugh says the science is out of whether trans athletes have a competitive advantage. This is completely false.
January 13, 2026 at 6:05 PM
Barrett once again asks what is stopping untalented men from joining the women's teams. this was already answered.
January 13, 2026 at 6:02 PM
says that BPJ's case is dependent is based on her havign no competitive advantage
January 13, 2026 at 6:01 PM
lawyer says that sex separation in sports is reasonable in the context of cisgender students, but not in the case of transgender students
January 13, 2026 at 5:58 PM
Sotomayor asking what the pathway to a title IX violation is. lawyer says it is essentially the same as general discrimination.
January 13, 2026 at 5:56 PM
claim of discrimination is based on the fact that this in effects bars BPJ from all sport options where she would be treated properly
January 13, 2026 at 5:52 PM
Laywer for BPJ is up
January 13, 2026 at 5:49 PM
Lawyers says Bostock does not apply because this only discriminates on the basis of sex, and that discrimination against trans is a second order effect, therefore it is legally okay.
January 13, 2026 at 5:49 PM
lawyer says that sex "does not mean circulating testosterone"
January 13, 2026 at 5:43 PM
Gorsuch says that if we use the original definition of sex as used at the time that the statute was adopted, we would also be accepting the discrimination that was taken for granted at the time.
January 13, 2026 at 5:42 PM
says classroom performance is not informed by biology, but that sports are in fact informed by biology
January 13, 2026 at 5:39 PM
Says that his case hinges on the idea that sex is determined at birth and immutable afterwards. If this shown to be false, the whole case collapses.
January 13, 2026 at 5:35 PM
second lawyer is up, same as the layer in the other case
January 13, 2026 at 5:33 PM
lawyer argues that "sex assigned at birth" is not a de facto classification for transgender status in the field of school sports
January 13, 2026 at 5:30 PM
lawyer says "we are indifferent to a person's gender identity when applying the law". Brown-Jackson is attacking this claim
January 13, 2026 at 5:27 PM
SC Justice asks if if were settled that trans people had equal outcomes in sports, would this case still stand? lawyer says that the legal standing would fall away
January 13, 2026 at 5:23 PM
Lawyer says that this is not sex discrimination because it applies to trans boys and trans girls in the exact same manner
January 13, 2026 at 5:20 PM
lawyer says Bostock does not apply because the law banning trans athletes is de facto discrimination, not de jure discrimination.
January 13, 2026 at 5:18 PM