Jarren Nylund
@jarrennylund.bsky.social
620 followers 900 following 44 posts
🎓 PhD Candidate (Social/Environmental Psychology) 🌱 Member of @GreenpeaceAP.bsky.social’s General Assembly 🌏 @ClimateRealityProject.org Leader 💁🏻‍♂️ Pronouns: He/him 🔗 Find me on other platforms: bio.site/jarrennylund
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
jarrennylund.bsky.social
Why do people fight for or against climate action?

Led by Prof. Matthew J. Hornsey, our new review article published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences delves into the moral arguments of collective climate action—on both sides of the debate: doi.org/10.1016/j.co...
Moral cases for collective action supporting and opposing mitigation efforts
jarrennylund.bsky.social
I enjoyed the opportunity to discuss this work with such an engaged group of scholars working on collective action research.

For those who are interested in the full paper, it’s available as an open access article in the Journal of Environmental Psychology: doi.org/10.1016/j.je...
Redirecting
doi.org
jarrennylund.bsky.social
Our findings show that while extreme climate protests can reduce support for the activist group carrying them out, they can also increase public concern about climate change and spur intentions to act—a tension that many activists and organisers face.
jarrennylund.bsky.social
Last week I had the pleasure of presenting at the 2025 Collective Action Network (CAN) Meeting on my recent research into the climate activist’s dilemma.
The climate activist's dilemma: Extreme climate protests reduce movement support but raise climate concern and intentions. Jarren L. Nylund, Michael Thai, Matthew J. Hornsey. Net Zero Observatory, Business School, The University of Queensland. School of Psychology, The University of Queensland.
jarrennylund.bsky.social
We should have another article coming out in the not too distant future summarising the various research we and others have done using this paradigm on these kinds of topics if you'd like me to share it with you when it is published.
jarrennylund.bsky.social
Thanks for sharing these links, Ketan. I imagine that each subsequent version is generally getting better, but will never be perfect (pictured is how it was explained to us). But yeah, definitely share your concern about the corporate aspect of the technology.
jarrennylund.bsky.social
Quite possibly! However, it should be noted that the effects on reducing scepticism among sceptics were susceptible to decay at follow-up. So, it might be that repetition of the intervention, or other factors are needed, to make the decline more durable.
jarrennylund.bsky.social
In the paper, we’re explicit about several limitations of the approach. However, we've now conducted several studies that are similar to those in this paper (on different science-related topics), with none of them finding inaccurate information being generated by ChatGPT on these topics.
jarrennylund.bsky.social
That's a fair concern, one that we address in the article itself. We used a validated process in which responses were fact-checked by another LLM (Claude), and a substantial subset of responses manually fact-checked by independent climate experts. Results found negligible evidence of misinformation.
jarrennylund.bsky.social
This paper is the product of a team effort from members of the Net Zero Observatory. I’m grateful to have worked alongside such talented colleagues: business.uq.edu.au/research/net...
A mock-up of what the second spread of “The promise and limitations of using GenAI to reduce climate scepticism” (Hornsey et al., 2025) article would look like printed.
jarrennylund.bsky.social
Across two studies, we found that short conversations with ChatGPT led climate sceptics to report lower confidence in their sceptical views and small increases in pro-environmental intentions.

You can read the article here:
doi.org/10.1038/s415...
A mock-up of what the first spread of “The promise and limitations of using GenAI to reduce climate scepticism” (Hornsey et al., 2025) article would look like printed.
jarrennylund.bsky.social
Thrilled to share my first publication in a Nature journal!

Our new article in Nature Climate Change (@natclimate.nature.com) explores whether conversations with generative AI tools like ChatGPT may help shift climate scepticism.
A mock-up of what the first page of “The promise and limitations of using GenAI to reduce climate scepticism” (Hornsey et al., 2025) article would look like printed.
jarrennylund.bsky.social
Thanks to my supervisors, progress review panel, fellow members of the Net Zero Observatory, and other friends and family for their support throughout this journey.

And in what feels like a rite of passage, I now also seem to have my very own UQ web profile: business.uq.edu.au/profile/1925...
Mr Jarren Nylund
business.uq.edu.au
jarrennylund.bsky.social
Pleased to announce that I successfully passed my PhD confirmation milestone at The University of Queensland (UQ) last week.

Excited to be continuing my research into factors that influence public perceptions of climate protests.
A photo of a UQ meeting room with a television mounted on the wall. The screen displays the title slide of Jarren Nylund’s PhD confirmation presentation: “Factors That Influence Public Perceptions of Climate Change Protests”
Reposted by Jarren Nylund
todorova.bsky.social
📢 🥳 New paper alert!

We developed a new task (RateME) for studying the effects of personal and group rejection and showed that both types of rejection can be linked to radicalization via increased hostility.

🔗 Link to the paper: shorturl.at/uJiDa
Group and personal rejection are similarly linked to extreme intergroup attitudes
Perceived marginalization of social groups has been identified as one of the main drivers of violent extremism across countries. However, most psychol…
shorturl.at
jarrennylund.bsky.social
Big thanks to Ryan and to the Wells Fargo protest organisers who engaged with the research directly. It’s powerful to see theory meet real-world action, and I hope this research adds nuance to conversations about protest strategy.
Activists Target Wells Fargo for Dropping its Climate Commitments - Inside Climate News
Seven protesters were arrested after coordinated actions in New York and San Francisco, as climate organizers escalate tactics against the bank. The campaign echoes findings from new research on publi...
insideclimatenews.org
jarrennylund.bsky.social
In the article, reporter Ryan Krugman highlights findings from my recently published article on the “climate activist’s dilemma”: extreme protest tactics may reduce support for activist groups, but simultaneously raise climate concern and personal willingness to act.
Activists Target Wells Fargo for Dropping its Climate Commitments - Inside Climate News
Seven protesters were arrested after coordinated actions in New York and San Francisco, as climate organizers escalate tactics against the bank. The campaign echoes findings from new research on publi...
insideclimatenews.org
Reposted by Jarren Nylund
milokei.bsky.social
Fascinating new empirical study about the efficacy of 'extreme' climate protest. Give it a read! The trade-off btw public disgust and public action

Have you summarised this as 'damned if you do, damned if you don't'@owasow.bsky.social?

#Sociology #AcademicSky #SocialMovements #ProtectProtest
owasow.bsky.social
New paper finds a ‘climate activist’s dilemma’: “study participants perceived climate activists engaging in extreme protests to be more immoral and supported movement less. However, extreme protests also heightened climate concern and intention to take action.” www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Journal of Environmental Psychology

The climate activist’s dilemma: Extreme protests reduce movement support but raise climate concern and intentions

Jarren L. Nylund, 
Michael Thai,
Matthew J. Hornsey 
Highlights
• Extreme (vs. moderate) climate protests reduce support for the activist group.
• Support was reduced via immorality, low emotional connection, and identification.
• Extreme (vs. moderate) climate protests increase climate concern and intentions.
• Extreme tactics may boost concern but harm activist group support.
• No loss of support for the broader climate movement or cause was observed. Abstract
Some members of the climate movement advocate for disruptive tactics, including mass civil disobedience, in the effort to pressure governments to address anthropogenic climate change. However, prior research on the “activist's dilemma” suggests that extreme protest actions may reduce public support for a movement. The present research aimed to discover if these findings would replicate within the highly moralised context of climate change, and explore target deservingness as a potential moderator. Across two studies, with Australian psychology students (Study 1; N=178) and a politically representative sample from the United Kingdom (Study 2; N=511), participants perceived climate activists engaging in extreme (vs. moderate) protests to be more immoral, felt less emotional connection and identification with them, and supported the movement less. However, Study 2 found that extreme (vs. moderate) protests also heightened climate concern and intentions to take climate-related actions. These findings highlight a “climate activist’s dilemma”: while extreme tactics may reduce support for the activist groups who engage in such tactics, they may simultaneously raise climate concern and personal intentions to act.
jarrennylund.bsky.social
Thanks to my co-authors, Michael Thai and Matthew Hornsey, for their guidance and support.

#climate #activistsdilemma
Redirecting
doi.org
jarrennylund.bsky.social
But here's the twist, those same extreme tactics can also make people more concerned about climate change and more willing to act on it.

It’s a complex trade-off that we have called the climate activist’s dilemma: doi.org/10.1016/j.je...
Photo of the article titled “The climate activist’s dilemma: Extreme protests reduce movement support but raise climate concern and intentions”. It is authored by Jarren L. Nylund, Michael Thai, and Matthew J. Hornsey, and published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology.

Abstract: Some members of the climate movement advocate for disruptive tactics, including mass civil disobedience, in the effort to pressure governments to address anthropogenic climate change. However, prior research on the “activist's dilemma” suggests that extreme protest actions may reduce public support for a movement. The present research aimed to discover if these findings would replicate within the highly moralised context of climate change, and explore target deservingness as a potential moderator. Across two studies, with Australian psychology students (Study 1; N = 178) and a politically representative sample from the United Kingdom (Study 2; N = 511), participants perceived climate activists engaging in extreme (vs. moderate) protests to be more immoral, felt less emotional connection and identification with them, and supported the movement less. However, Study 2 found that extreme (vs. moderate) protests also heightened climate concern and intentions to take climate-related actions. These findings highlight a “climate activist's dilemma”: while extreme tactics may reduce support for the activist groups who engage in such tactics, they may simultaneously raise climate concern and personal intentions to act.
jarrennylund.bsky.social
Proud to share my first lead-author publication, now out in the Journal of Environmental Psychology!

We found that extreme climate protests (like blockades and defacing property with paint) can backfire by reducing support for the climate movement.
Photo of the article titled “The climate activist’s dilemma: Extreme protests reduce movement support but raise climate concern and intentions”. It is authored by Jarren L. Nylund, Michael Thai, and Matthew J. Hornsey, and published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology.

Abstract: Some members of the climate movement advocate for disruptive tactics, including mass civil disobedience, in the effort to pressure governments to address anthropogenic climate change. However, prior research on the “activist's dilemma” suggests that extreme protest actions may reduce public support for a movement. The present research aimed to discover if these findings would replicate within the highly moralised context of climate change, and explore target deservingness as a potential moderator. Across two studies, with Australian psychology students (Study 1; N = 178) and a politically representative sample from the United Kingdom (Study 2; N = 511), participants perceived climate activists engaging in extreme (vs. moderate) protests to be more immoral, felt less emotional connection and identification with them, and supported the movement less. However, Study 2 found that extreme (vs. moderate) protests also heightened climate concern and intentions to take climate-related actions. These findings highlight a “climate activist's dilemma”: while extreme tactics may reduce support for the activist groups who engage in such tactics, they may simultaneously raise climate concern and personal intentions to act.