jon ben-menachem
banner
jbenmenachem.com
jon ben-menachem
@jbenmenachem.com
criminalization, abolition, labor, politics, journalism—social science theory & methods too. sociology phd candidate @ columbia. @swcolumbia.bsky.social
I’m simply arguing that we should pay attention to recent history. You may want to look into the outcomes of procedural justice and implicit bias training
January 12, 2026 at 7:20 PM
Possible you haven’t been following me for long enough on this one
January 12, 2026 at 7:10 PM
And to be clear organizing more workplaces is not a trivial step. It takes a ton of work but produces huge benefits, and not just in the workplace. IMO unionization is political socialization
January 12, 2026 at 6:57 PM
I think general strikes would fundamentally transform US politics, but that cuts both ways — as in, US political life would have to look radically different for an effective general strike to be organized
January 12, 2026 at 6:50 PM
Tbh I’m not even sure that police abolition has to be debated in this context since ICE is a very new agency that’s much less popular than local police.
January 12, 2026 at 6:18 PM
I actually don't really care if the stock market behaves this way forever, I just think we should have a policy infrastructure that completely separates those cycles from the everyday life of ordinary people
January 12, 2026 at 6:18 PM
Eh, I think the initial post represents Block's rationality argument fairly well (given character limits). The structural position of capital means that it is inherently incapable of effectively sustaining through politics its broader agenda--it can't 'see' the political concerns
January 12, 2026 at 6:16 PM
The major index funds have been booming for months on the same 10 companies sending each other $5 (billion) back and forth on venmo
January 12, 2026 at 6:14 PM
see this old thread lol bsky.app/profile/jben...
The sad thing is that "elite social networks and credentialing institutions explain how capital influences state behavior" is generally seen as a weak and outdated explanation. But over the past couple years all the most vulgar theories of state/capital relations are looking correct
January 12, 2026 at 6:11 PM
Yeah. And I mean I think Bouie has a long track record of understanding this, so trying to give benefit of doubt slate.com/news-and-pol...
ICE Is Out of Control
Trump has empowered a draconian deportation force that can’t distinguish the real immigration threats.
slate.com
January 12, 2026 at 6:06 PM
Basically, if you give moderates an opportunity to pass training reforms without touching ICE's budget, headcount, or technological capacity, the "on ramp" is really just an "off ramp," because they will be able to point to a bill they supported that deals with "the ICE problem."
January 12, 2026 at 6:01 PM
Just to tie up the threads, I basically think so long as liberal politicians don't *actually* try to implement retraining reforms first (just pay lip service to sell the defund-ICE legislation) then that's ok. Actual implementation would burn all the outrage bsky.app/profile/jame...
If the “ICE Retraining Act of 2029” ends the agency, fires its officers and reconstitutes immigration enforcement entirely, I don’t think that is a set of mere reforms. And Mark Warner is talking about training and Sherrod Brown abolition, that is a distance you can close.
January 12, 2026 at 5:57 PM
Yeah I just mean like, to the extent that we're making the comparison, it's worth noting that ICE abolition has an easier path
January 12, 2026 at 5:53 PM
Yeah if the point is that we should do a trojan horse bill I’m fine with that.
January 12, 2026 at 5:50 PM
Tbh I’m not even sure that police abolition has to be debated in this context since ICE is a very new agency that’s much less popular than local police.
January 12, 2026 at 5:48 PM
I think there would be a more solid case for something like “unmasking mandates”
January 12, 2026 at 5:46 PM
Reposted by jon ben-menachem
This is just “why not say reform instead of defund?” Because one of those carries false assumptions and creates room for reactionary policy!
January 12, 2026 at 5:13 PM