J.D. Rees
@jdreesiii.bsky.social
Attorney, US & int'l politics junkie, LA sports fan, amateur astronomer/cosmology enthusiast, Husband of Angela, father of Harper, Piper, and Penny
I will not donate anything to any incumbent Senate Democrats between now and the 2026 midterms unless and until @schumer.senate.gov @chuckschumer.com agrees to resign from his role Senate Minority Leader. It is past time for new leadership in the Democratic Party—especially in the Senate.
November 11, 2025 at 4:19 AM
Senator, respectfully, when the leader of your opposition cannot hold the opposition together, it's time to get a new leader whom you, your colleagues, and the party can trust in this next phase of "back to fighting"—someone who *can* hold the opposition together.
November 11, 2025 at 3:06 AM
Senator, respectfully, when the leader of your opposition cannot hold the opposition together, it's time to get a new leader whom you, your colleagues, and the party can trust in this next phase of "back to fighting"—someone who *can* hold the opposition together.
#1, the point of this exercise is that it does NOT require 60 votes. That's the beauty of doubling the judiciary!
#2 gerrymandering messes with a LOT of shit, but Senate seats are not one of them. Senate seats are statewide elections, so no district drawing matters at all.
#2 gerrymandering messes with a LOT of shit, but Senate seats are not one of them. Senate seats are statewide elections, so no district drawing matters at all.
November 3, 2025 at 4:55 PM
#1, the point of this exercise is that it does NOT require 60 votes. That's the beauty of doubling the judiciary!
#2 gerrymandering messes with a LOT of shit, but Senate seats are not one of them. Senate seats are statewide elections, so no district drawing matters at all.
#2 gerrymandering messes with a LOT of shit, but Senate seats are not one of them. Senate seats are statewide elections, so no district drawing matters at all.
A devastating, impeachment-worthy admission. And plainly not true which, given the context, reeks of other impeachment-worthy corruption.
He expects Americans to be stupid enough to believe that he had no idea he happened to be pardoning a felon who just paid his family billions in crypto! lol foh
He expects Americans to be stupid enough to believe that he had no idea he happened to be pardoning a felon who just paid his family billions in crypto! lol foh
November 3, 2025 at 4:32 AM
A devastating, impeachment-worthy admission. And plainly not true which, given the context, reeks of other impeachment-worthy corruption.
He expects Americans to be stupid enough to believe that he had no idea he happened to be pardoning a felon who just paid his family billions in crypto! lol foh
He expects Americans to be stupid enough to believe that he had no idea he happened to be pardoning a felon who just paid his family billions in crypto! lol foh
Today is a great day to share the new party line: #DoubleTheFederalJudiciary. All we need is simple majorities in both houses of Congress to change the number of district court, appellate, and SCOTUS judges. Not 60 votes to impeach, not 3/4 to change Constitution; simple majorities. That's it.
November 3, 2025 at 3:45 AM
T-minus, what, one month till we find out about CZ sending personal emissaries to Trump and his failsons in the lead-up to bribery payments and CZ's pardon?
November 3, 2025 at 3:39 AM
T-minus, what, one month till we find out about CZ sending personal emissaries to Trump and his failsons in the lead-up to bribery payments and CZ's pardon?
Reposted by J.D. Rees
It's so wild that, for decades, automation in the modern imaginary was this force to liberate us from manual labor and free us up to pursue art and poetry and other creative fields. And now our "futurists" are telling us the *computers* will be creative and *we* will toil in mines and factories?
November 2, 2025 at 8:01 PM
It's so wild that, for decades, automation in the modern imaginary was this force to liberate us from manual labor and free us up to pursue art and poetry and other creative fields. And now our "futurists" are telling us the *computers* will be creative and *we* will toil in mines and factories?
Take it a step further. How many national monuments/memorials could he take a sledgehammer to before the GOP in Congress say something? Anything?
October 25, 2025 at 12:55 AM
Take it a step further. How many national monuments/memorials could he take a sledgehammer to before the GOP in Congress say something? Anything?
Reposted by J.D. Rees
It is, as they say, fire.
February 18, 2025 at 12:14 AM
It is, as they say, fire.
(i was quoting Mr. Burns's response to that line you referenced, big dog <3)
October 21, 2025 at 4:03 PM
(i was quoting Mr. Burns's response to that line you referenced, big dog <3)
So what you're saying is... he's indestructible?
October 21, 2025 at 3:53 PM
So what you're saying is... he's indestructible?