Jed H. Shugerman
@jedshug.bsky.social
21K followers 1.4K following 1.3K posts
Prof Boston U. Law. JD/PhD History & dad jokes. 5th most-cited legal historian, 2019-23 Book: The People’s Courts. Next: A Faithful President: The Founders v. the Originalists http://shugerblog.com http://ssrn.com/author=625422
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Jed H. Shugerman
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
The same people who insisted devout Catholic Joe Biden was leading a “war on Christianity” are now cheering Trump on as his armed goons assault clergymen.
thetnholler.bsky.social
WATCH: Trump’s lawless Ice goons shoot an unarmed priest in the head with a pepper ball. Completely out of control.
Reposted by Jed H. Shugerman
adamrothman.bsky.social
“Deportations like Sergio’s — to fixtures of the community — are making people think, ‘This could be me next, or my favorite place next, or somebody who I talk to every day’"
emptywheel.bsky.social
Make sure you read the report about how Stephen Miller deported Waco's favorite Mexican restaurant owner.

www.texastribune.org/2025/10/07/t...
A picture of Sergio Garcia and George W and Laura Bush. It is signed, To Sergio Garcia with best wishes.
jedshug.bsky.social
I think too many originalists cherry-pick from the First Congress, ignore overwhelming contrary evidence, and assume the First Congress is reliable evidence of original meaning.
@kexelchabot and I are both primarily fact-checkers who cautiously see some value from this evidence.
jedshug.bsky.social
Taylor Swift “Fate of Ophelia” intro seems to be a riff on The Police’s reggae riff “Wrapped Around Your Finger.”
Nice. I wonder if there is a Shakespeare layer yo that.
Sting as Hamlet?
open.spotify.com/track/400ZJA...
Wrapped Around Your Finger - Remastered 2003
open.spotify.com
Reposted by Jed H. Shugerman
markhisted.org
"When a President invokes a statute to support action that does not align with—or runs directly contrary to—statutory purpose, that is evidence of an abuse of power."

- @jedshug.bsky.social

(We shouldn't need this reminder, but in these times...)

journals.law.harvard...
emergency clause is open-ended, interpreters should emphasize
context and purposes to give intelligible meaning and scope to the
clause; and second, the means must fit the emergency ends. Congress expects emergency powers to be invoked when immediate
action from the President is necessary to effectively respond to a
disaster or crisis reached by the statute; Congress never intended
emergency power provisions to aggrandize the reach of presidential power past the intended reach of a statute. Thus, when an emergency power is invoked, it should typically be permissible only if it
does not conflict with statutory purpose. When a President invokes
a statute to support action that does not align with—or runs directly
contrary to—statutory purpose, that is evidence of an abuse of
power. The language, legislative history, and historical context of a
statute may shed light on its purpose.
This approach would serve as a solution to both problems: First,
it solves a longstanding problem in the in
jedshug.bsky.social
The MedBed of Trump:
Everyone magically fits, whether you’re too short or too tall.

Stop by our showroom — an ICE agent named Procrustes will make sure of it.
alkapdc.bsky.social
Trump tonight appears to have pushed the false "medbed" conspiracy theory, which has spread in the far-right internet over the years. www.yahoo.com/news/qanon-c...
jedshug.bsky.social
Sorry, this is the correct link to the Trump v. Cook amicus brief the SCOTUS site:
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...
www.supremecourt.gov
Reposted by Jed H. Shugerman
jedshug.bsky.social
Trump has done more to establish a unitary executive than all the judges or legal scholars in the world could ever do.

And Trump has done more to discredit and expose the unitary executive theory as lawless authoritarianism than any judge or legal scholar could ever do.
jedshug.bsky.social
Offices can be both property and have sureties. It was not either/or.
The transition was so gradual, no one has identified when or even if offices are no longer protected as a form of property.
jedshug.bsky.social
Marshall says Marbury is unremovable three times.
In 1803.
Why?
Because protected offices were still property, as I have explained in many places and publications, building on Manners and Menand,
jedshug.bsky.social
The entire unitary project is bunk.
Ahistorical myth.
Anti-rule-of-law absurdity.
But there's debunked bunk, and then there's bunker bunk.
The Roberts Court won't admit error about the bunker bunk they've already decided, but will 5 Justices approve this round of authoritarianism?
I don't know.
jedshug.bsky.social
1. The long-game. It took decades for "Lochner" to discredit itself & become the label for ideological pro-corporate judges.

2. The short-game. There is a non-zero chance that these escalating abuses could make 2 or 3 Justices think twice. They already tried (weakly) to carve out a Fed exception.
Reposted by Jed H. Shugerman
jamesgoodwin.bsky.social
There should be a 12-syllable German word for this basic phenomenon
jedshug.bsky.social
Trump has done more to establish a unitary executive than all the judges or legal scholars in the world could ever do.

And Trump has done more to discredit and expose the unitary executive theory as lawless authoritarianism than any judge or legal scholar could ever do.
jedshug.bsky.social
Echoes of Humpty Dumpty...

Trumpty Dumpty built a great unitary wall.
Trumpty Dumpty had a great unitary fall.
And all the King's originalists and all the King's crony officers
Couldn't put the unitary executive back together again.
a cartoon of donald trump and mike pence playing golf on showtime
ALT: a cartoon of donald trump and mike pence playing golf on showtime
media.tenor.com
jedshug.bsky.social
Trump has done more to establish a unitary executive than all the judges or legal scholars in the world could ever do.

And Trump has done more to discredit and expose the unitary executive theory as lawless authoritarianism than any judge or legal scholar could ever do.