Jen
@jenmackessack.bsky.social
PhD student interested in (psych of) politics/social policy. Working on discourse and conversation in women's homelessness services.
I like running (trail), biking (mtb/gravel) and skiing (whatever I can get).
Tired.
I like running (trail), biking (mtb/gravel) and skiing (whatever I can get).
Tired.
Reposted by Jen
If someone says to you, "what are you doing about students' use of AI?" ask them, "do you think that this should be my problem? How good do you think my response can be? Should it not be up to legislators & administrators to defend against a commercial industry's attack on your child's education?"
December 24, 2025 at 7:47 PM
If someone says to you, "what are you doing about students' use of AI?" ask them, "do you think that this should be my problem? How good do you think my response can be? Should it not be up to legislators & administrators to defend against a commercial industry's attack on your child's education?"
Reposted by Jen
And it really emphasises how our media just cannot be normal about trans people.
Constant descriptions of Dr. Upton not as a trans woman, but as "a man etc," it's a warped definition of impartiality where acknowledgement of transness at all is "taking a side."
Constant descriptions of Dr. Upton not as a trans woman, but as "a man etc," it's a warped definition of impartiality where acknowledgement of transness at all is "taking a side."
December 14, 2025 at 12:29 PM
And it really emphasises how our media just cannot be normal about trans people.
Constant descriptions of Dr. Upton not as a trans woman, but as "a man etc," it's a warped definition of impartiality where acknowledgement of transness at all is "taking a side."
Constant descriptions of Dr. Upton not as a trans woman, but as "a man etc," it's a warped definition of impartiality where acknowledgement of transness at all is "taking a side."
Think they're burdens rather than covenants but I don't know enough about the law to know the difference.
December 10, 2025 at 10:09 PM
Think they're burdens rather than covenants but I don't know enough about the law to know the difference.
Reposted by Jen
I'm sure you're very proud of yourselves in the journalism space though, eh? Off you went to learn the trade, bright eyed and idealistic about speaking truth to power, and here you all are just doing The Gay Agenda Is Out To Get Everyone again but subbing in trans people as the target. Mortifying.
December 9, 2025 at 9:02 AM
I'm sure you're very proud of yourselves in the journalism space though, eh? Off you went to learn the trade, bright eyed and idealistic about speaking truth to power, and here you all are just doing The Gay Agenda Is Out To Get Everyone again but subbing in trans people as the target. Mortifying.
Reposted by Jen
That's not a compromise. There is no compromise position lurking somewhere between "treat trans people as full and equal members of society" and "treat trans people as second-class citizens". Labour have chosen the latter option.
December 5, 2025 at 3:37 PM
That's not a compromise. There is no compromise position lurking somewhere between "treat trans people as full and equal members of society" and "treat trans people as second-class citizens". Labour have chosen the latter option.