I wonder where we are today?
I wonder where we are today?
1) Only canids have knots (at least the kind furries like to draw).
2) knots aren't supposed to slide/pop in/out (at all).
3) It was me, I ate the last chicken nugget.
You're welcome.
1) Only canids have knots (at least the kind furries like to draw).
2) knots aren't supposed to slide/pop in/out (at all).
3) It was me, I ate the last chicken nugget.
You're welcome.
1: coerced sex (hypnotism, etc) is still rape.
2: Unless it's bdsm/roleplay with all its guardrails, safe words, etc., the "top" forcing the "bottom" against their will is still rape.
3: Dubious consent is just that. Consent must be clear at all times.
Don't be rapey.
1: coerced sex (hypnotism, etc) is still rape.
2: Unless it's bdsm/roleplay with all its guardrails, safe words, etc., the "top" forcing the "bottom" against their will is still rape.
3: Dubious consent is just that. Consent must be clear at all times.
Don't be rapey.
Here's a crazy fucking idea!
How about... Just...
DON'T DO IT.
It doesn't get your point across, it doesn't bring about change, it doesn't do anything but get you bullshit points with "friends" you should have dropped years ago.
Here's a crazy fucking idea!
How about... Just...
DON'T DO IT.
It doesn't get your point across, it doesn't bring about change, it doesn't do anything but get you bullshit points with "friends" you should have dropped years ago.
In fact, during adversarial testing specific artist names on bing resulted in a warning, image failure (the dog), or drastically reduced image quality. On ChatGPT, you get told that an image couldn't be created or garbage quality. To be continued again o.o;
In fact, during adversarial testing specific artist names on bing resulted in a warning, image failure (the dog), or drastically reduced image quality. On ChatGPT, you get told that an image couldn't be created or garbage quality. To be continued again o.o;
And creates a realistic*, believable looking result (with certain constraints) that varies based on modifiers like "furry art style", anime, fantasy, etc. that don't look identifiably like any specific artist I'm aware of.
To be continued on #3
And creates a realistic*, believable looking result (with certain constraints) that varies based on modifiers like "furry art style", anime, fantasy, etc. that don't look identifiably like any specific artist I'm aware of.
To be continued on #3
1)
I've been dinking around with DALL-E 3. It's still not about to replace a human artist. It's good, but not human.
Its furry "art" is pretty amazing. The AI understands the *concept* of an anthro animal (to be continued)
1)
I've been dinking around with DALL-E 3. It's still not about to replace a human artist. It's good, but not human.
Its furry "art" is pretty amazing. The AI understands the *concept* of an anthro animal (to be continued)
Thought 1) I experiment with ML and generative AI... But I find the idea of training a model or "checkpoint" to specifically mimic a particular person's style, or only produce "good" results when you include multiple artist tags to be *deeply offensive*.
Thought 1) I experiment with ML and generative AI... But I find the idea of training a model or "checkpoint" to specifically mimic a particular person's style, or only produce "good" results when you include multiple artist tags to be *deeply offensive*.