Jonathan Gienapp
@jgienapp.bsky.social
1.4K followers 420 following 65 posts
Professor of History and Law, Stanford University. Books on early Constitution: http://tinyurl.com/yynk95aa; and originalism and history: http://tinyurl.com/3dd5hnt6 jonathangienapp.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Jonathan Gienapp
gauthamrao.bsky.social
My brilliant colleague Kate Haulman's new book is out today: The Mother of Washington in Nineteenth-Century America (Oxford, 2025). I'm obviously biased but it is really exquisite!

global.oup.com/academic/pro...
global.oup.com
Reposted by Jonathan Gienapp
jacobdcharles.bsky.social
When it addresses what history is most useful (founding-era) it raises an interesting q about Bruen's emphasis on *text*. Tho the court doesn't cite @jgienapp.bsky.social or Jud Campbell's work about the limited relevance of textual specification, that seems to be in the background of this worry.
jgienapp.bsky.social
Thanks! Much appreciated.
Reposted by Jonathan Gienapp
clivemitchell1.bsky.social
If you're interested in constitutional governance (in this case US governance), I can strongly recommend this book from @jgienapp.bsky.social. Wonderfully lucid. And, as a (very) lay reader, I appreciated the reiterated arguments and the plain, pithy prose.
Reposted by Jonathan Gienapp
johannneem.bsky.social
7) In his new book @jgienapp.bsky.social argues that one cannot understand the Constitution without placing it into the contexts in which it was written-- none more so than the Founders' commitment to republicanism.
Against Constitutional Originalism
A detailed and compelling examination of how the legal theory of originalism ignores and distorts the very constitutional history from which it derives inter...
yalebooks.yale.edu
Reposted by Jonathan Gienapp
jacobdcharles.bsky.social
directly in the face of recent historical scholarship by Jud Campbell, @jgienapp.bsky.social, and others, that demonstrates how rights at the founding were not conceived of as these textual objects only secured once codified in a constitution.
Reposted by Jonathan Gienapp
oah.org
📣 Catch OAH speakers Jonathan Gienapp & Stephanie E. Jones-Rogers in Sept at San Francisco St Univ! They'll be speaking Sept. 17 & 18 for SFSU’s Constitution & Citizenship Day Conference. #OAHLecturer

📅 history.sfsu.edu/constitution...

🎤 Bring a speaker to your campus! www.oah.org/lectures/upc...
Jonathan Gienapp Stephanie E. Jones-Rogers
Reposted by Jonathan Gienapp
Reposted by Jonathan Gienapp
gauthamrao.bsky.social
It’s been a hell of a run. Being Editor of @lawandhistrev.bsky.social has been the greatest honor of my career. But it had to end some time. I’ll be stepping down as Editor by next summer. I’ll give proper thanks to LHR’s Associate Editors & ASLH folks in due course. What a bittersweet moment!
Reposted by Jonathan Gienapp
Today the Balkinization blog features my reflections at the end of its seven-scholar symposium on my new book The Oldest Constitutional Question: Enumeration and Federal Power. You can find my short essay at the link below.

Many thanks to the participants.

balkin.blogspot.com/2025/07/grat...
Balkinization: Gratitude, and a Reply in Two Parts
A group blog on constitutional law, theory, and politics
balkin.blogspot.com
Reposted by Jonathan Gienapp
Reposted by Jonathan Gienapp
jacobdcharles.bsky.social
Interesting how originalists try to avoid historians' critiques. This, to me, is no more persuasive than the others. 'History' is what happened & our interpretations of it--you can't have a law of the past that isn't fundamentally yoked to trying to get that right.

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Does Good Originalism Need Good History?
One might think that originalism by definition is largely about history. After all, what does it mean to be "originalist" if not to be concerned prima
papers.ssrn.com
Reposted by Jonathan Gienapp
The final contribution to the Balkinization symposium on my new book *The Oldest Constitutional Question* is by Prof. John Mikhail of Georgetown. You can find it here:

balkin.blogspot.com/2025/07/why-...

@johnmikhail.bsky.social

Sometime soon, I'll post a response to all the symposium essays.
Balkinization: Why Did the Framers Enumerate Congressional Powers?
A group blog on constitutional law, theory, and politics
balkin.blogspot.com
jgienapp.bsky.social
This only makes me more excited. 😉