They simply re-used an existing name already employed by popular and historically significant software. How is this kind of thing possible?
academic.oup.com/bioinformati...
They simply re-used an existing name already employed by popular and historically significant software. How is this kind of thing possible?
academic.oup.com/bioinformati...
eppd13.cz?page_id=2587
eppd13.cz?page_id=2587
arstechnica.com/ai/2025/06/y...
arstechnica.com/ai/2025/06/y...
Science isn’t social media, and it’s dangerous to treat it as such. For this reason, I believe preprints serve an anti-science agenda & threaten our fields.
Check out my editorial in @ScholarlyKitchen.bsky.social.
🧪 #SciPub
Oh wow, THIS is what Scott Hawley and I exchanged some e-mails about last year! Definitely gotta read this now.
academic.oup.com/genetics/adv...
Oh wow, THIS is what Scott Hawley and I exchanged some e-mails about last year! Definitely gotta read this now.
academic.oup.com/genetics/adv...
In short, publish less, review more.
In short, publish less, review more.
If so, the one thing you all can do is persuade colleagues to submit and make this a norm. 1/2
If so, the one thing you all can do is persuade colleagues to submit and make this a norm. 1/2
I just deleted the entire thing in 15 minutes, thanks to a great script from Luca Hammer:
github.com/lucahammer/t...
Thanks to @amyhoy.bsky.social and @thomasfuchs.at for steering me there.
I just deleted the entire thing in 15 minutes, thanks to a great script from Luca Hammer:
github.com/lucahammer/t...
Thanks to @amyhoy.bsky.social and @thomasfuchs.at for steering me there.
For me, it has to be setting up ssh keys with my servers.
For me, it has to be setting up ssh keys with my servers.