Richard Sever
richardsever.bsky.social
Richard Sever
@richardsever.bsky.social
Chief Science and Strategy Officer, openRxiv. Co-Founder, bioRxiv and medRxiv.
Pinned
Preprints of pandemic potential - new historical piece from me on the history of bioRxiv/medRxiv, their role in the pandemic, and the way forward. 1/n journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/...
"We believed contributions such as interactive articles and visualizations were held back by not being seen as real publications...we no longer believe this...the bottleneck is the amount of effort and the unusual combination of scientific and design expertise required" distill.pub/2021/distill...
Distill Hiatus
After five years, Distill will be taking a break.
distill.pub
February 10, 2026 at 4:26 PM
That "ivermectin has become a symbol of resistance against the medical establishment among conservatives" is insane.

Meanwhile "appalled...It’s absurd” isn't an NCI judgment one wants about a proposed study. Cancer folk, is there any justification for the study?
kffhealthnews.org/news/article...
US Cancer Institute Studying Ivermectin’s ‘Ability To Kill Cancer Cells’ - KFF Health News
At a January event organized by allies of health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., National Cancer Institute Director Anthony Letai said results may be released “in a few months.” Ivermectin, used to d...
kffhealthnews.org
February 10, 2026 at 2:17 PM
"If a plagiarized paper by an author who claims he didn’t write it disappears from a journal’s website with no notice, did it ever exist?"

Yes - it'll have been downloaded, search engines will've indexed it. This is why bioRxiv/medRxiv do not disappear papers.

retractionwatch.com/2026/02/05/j...
Journal silently removes paper for plagiarism, author claims identity theft
If a plagiarized paper by an author who claims he didn’t write it disappears from a journal’s website with no notice, did it ever exist in the first place? It’s not just a philosophical question fo…
retractionwatch.com
February 9, 2026 at 12:07 PM
This New Yorker is not blaming the mayor for physics www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
Rightwing critics blame Mamdani as New York snow fails to melt
Murdoch tabloid leads charge as big freeze persists – could the mayor please do something about the weather?
www.theguardian.com
February 8, 2026 at 2:47 PM
“No we can’t ‘just do [X]’. It’s more complicated than that”
Without naming your job, tell me something you say over and over again at work.

"Where are your citations?"
Without naming your job, tell me something you say over and over again at work.

"No, you can't leave that here."
February 8, 2026 at 12:02 AM
Reposted by Richard Sever
Have I ever mentioned how surreal it is to be an Editor-in-Chief of a journal called Vaccine right now?

www.science.org/content/arti...

It’s pretty wild, at least by typical academic journal editorial office standards.
Controversial Danish vaccine research group faces new allegations
Researchers say they couldn’t find complete data for 10 trials that together enrolled tens of thousands of children in Guinea-Bissau
www.science.org
February 6, 2026 at 6:14 AM
Reposted by Richard Sever
Exciting preprint from the @merz.bsky.social lab proposing how fidelity of membrane fusion is achieved #membranes #trafficking
Sequential restriction of SNARE-mediated fusion by the COPII inner coat and SNARE chaperones www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
www.biorxiv.org
February 5, 2026 at 4:41 PM
Reposted by Richard Sever
7️⃣ chablis, frascati, merlot, retsina, riesling, cabernet, grenache, chardonnay, chianti, pinotage, sauternes, weißherbst, zinfandel. A set of zebrafish mutants with defects in embryonic hematopoiesis.

journals.biologists.com/dev/article-...
Characterization of zebrafish mutants with defects in embryonic hematopoiesis
ABSTRACT. As part of a large scale chemical mutagenesis screen of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) genome, we have identified 33 mutants with defects in hematopoiesis. Complementation analysis placed 32 of...
journals.biologists.com
January 28, 2026 at 10:29 AM
"A living article...dynamic...instead of a static document, an evolving knowledge object that combines narrative with data, code, methods, and context"

This idea comes up often, but IME scientists are rarely as enthusiastic about it as publishers... 1/2 scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/02/05/b...
Back to the (Article of the) Future: An interview with Sami Benchekroun and Rod Cookson - The Scholarly Kitchen
In this interview with Alice Meadows, Sami Benchekroun (Morressier/Molecular Connections) and Rod Cookson (The Royal Society) share their thoughts about how and why scholarly publishing needs to move ...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
February 5, 2026 at 9:29 PM
Best articulated here by the JCS Caveman years ago journals.biologists.com/jcs/article/...
February 4, 2026 at 6:12 PM
"Writing papers is rarely (probably never) the rate-limiting step in scientific research"

Important to remember this. However painful writing is, however much more efficient we can make it, for experimental work it's the research that takes the time.

www.linkedin.com/feed/update/...
𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗔𝗜 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗺—𝗮 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗟𝗮𝗧𝗲𝗫 𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀. But this isn't about LaTeX. And it's not about training data. They could get… | Adam Hyde | 25 comments
𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗔𝗜 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗺—𝗮 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗟𝗮𝗧𝗲𝗫 𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀. But this isn't about LaTeX. And it's not about training data. They could get papers from arXiv or partner with Overleaf for that. So w...
www.linkedin.com
February 4, 2026 at 2:55 PM
"authors also express frustration at the amount of work expected for a single publishable unit, a concern we
share (while humbly noting that it may not be
held by the same authors when they serve as
reviewers of other work)" <-THAT www.nature.com/articles/s41... ht @ritastrack.bsky.social
The ever-changing communication of scientific discovery
Nature Biomedical Engineering - We take a look at how scientific articles have evolved over time and envision possible changes to how research findings are communicated in the age of digital media...
www.nature.com
February 3, 2026 at 9:55 PM
Jesus...
Good morning! As an addiction scientist and clinical psychology PhD candidate writing their dissertation on compulsive alcohol use: THIS IS GOING TO GET PEOPLE KILLED.

Moral conceptualizations of addiction and mental health lead to shame and bad outcomes.

www.nytimes.com/2026/02/02/h...
H.H.S. to Expand Faith-Based Addiction Programs for Homeless
www.nytimes.com
February 3, 2026 at 9:50 PM
"publication systems [should] distinguish between dissemination of results & communication of ideas, and optimize them separately. Results should be in explicit, machine-readable form, while narrative text serves as an interpretive layer for human readers" www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
www.biorxiv.org
February 3, 2026 at 8:34 PM
"AI is rapidly populating medical records with synthetic content, creating a feedback loop [that] drives a rapid erosion of pathological variability and diagnostic reliability...this renders AI generated documentation clinically useless after just two generations" www.medrxiv.org/content/10.6...
AI-generated data contamination erodes pathological variability and diagnostic reliability
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly populating medical records with synthetic content, creating a feedback loop where future models are increasingly at risk of training on uncurated AI ...
www.medrxiv.org
February 3, 2026 at 1:59 AM
'"We definitely screwed up" says King...she wishes she'd posted the study as a preprint so that the errors could have been caught sooner'

www.nature.com/articles/d41...
What were the first animals? The fierce sponge–jelly battle that just won’t end
For almost two decades, scientists have debated whether sponges or comb jellies are the first animal lineage. Now some are calling for a more harmonious approach.
www.nature.com
February 3, 2026 at 12:12 AM
Feel like we should be starting all Zoom calls with "Dearly beloved, we are gathered here" at the moment.
February 2, 2026 at 6:42 PM
Nature and Science journalists denied entry to event featuring NIH Director
I'm at the Willard Hotel where I've been denied entry and kicked out of the Reclaiming Science event with NIH director Bhattacharya & other top agency leaders.

@jocelynkaiser.bsky.social and I registered for the event months ago yet were told capacity was full, even as they let in dozens of others.
January 31, 2026 at 2:50 AM
Biochemistry 🤣
tell me five classes you took in college

shakespeare in the 20th century
international relations theory
the making of the american national myth
biochemistry + molecular modeling lab
wines
Never mind the jobs you had, tell me five classes you took in college

Urban politics
Urban sociology
Mid 20th century U.S. History
Gender and Politics
World History (I'm sorry for sleeping through this at 8am, but the prof was so nice in office hours, I will always pay that forward)
January 31, 2026 at 12:41 AM
Reposted by Richard Sever
Every time someone uncritically repeats this meme about tens of thousands of undiscovered functional noncoding RNA genes in the human genome, an angel loses its wings.
January 30, 2026 at 1:43 PM
This was a major point of the 'future' section here journals.plos.org/plosbiology/...
the key to me is to distinguish veracity (data provenance), quality (accuracy and competence), interest (who should read it), and importance (significance of the findings for the field). We currently conflate these too much in unidimensional indicators like journal brand/JIF
January 28, 2026 at 3:14 PM
Reposted by Richard Sever
Just amazing to see the virus cell entry process is such detail!
Check out our new preprint! We uncover the full molecular mechanism of rotavirus membrane penetration and cytosolic escape using cryo-ET, live-cell imaging, and single-molecule assays. (1/3)

🔗 biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
January 28, 2026 at 2:09 PM
We need to create “bubble up” systems involving human and machine readers to surface things requiring more scrutiny and context, with audit trails ensuring veracity of the supporting data.
I think that is the core of the peer-review crisis. If we were to only do peer review of the scientific work that is both important enough and non-trivial, we would all save a lot of time. It will obviously be a challenge to decide what needs to be reviewed, I acknowledge that.
January 28, 2026 at 2:06 PM
This 🧵- any ‘article of the future’ proposals must consider this first.

Discussions about new features/formats for human readers make little sense until we address this.
Our existing institutions for upholding research quality (journals, peer review, grant panels) are ill-equipped for the coming tsunami of probably correct but trivial stuff.
January 28, 2026 at 2:02 PM