Joseph Huddleston
@joehud.bsky.social
1.7K followers 520 following 590 posts
Associate Professor at @setonhall.bsky.social Diplomacy. Teaches conflict, nationalism, methods. Researches separatism, diplomacy, civilians in conflict. Sabbatical-ing as a CFR-fellow/Senate staffer. Yes I will belay you.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
joehud.bsky.social
I am spending my sabbatical year working on Cory Booker's foreign policy team. What he pulled off with his 25-hr speech was extraordinary. I feel proud and incredibly privileged to have contributed.

Here's a bit of the national security section my team worked on: youtu.be/GnKDC5xzAi0?...
President Trump is Making America Less Safe | Senator Cory Booker’s long speech to the U.S. Senate
YouTube video by Senator Cory Booker
youtu.be
joehud.bsky.social
This is lovely, Steve. Brandon was a great colleague, and we are really feeling the loss at SHU School of Diplomacy. He got a lot done in his two short years here, including taking over as director of DiploLab and coauthoring several pieces with students.
joehud.bsky.social
Thank you, Sebastian!

Link for free access (can be used 50 times total):
www.tandfonline.com/eprint/6AZGX...

Andrea, I agree with you, and we grappled with this question a lot. Our framework leaves room for mindful advocacy.

Here's my thread from last week: bsky.app/profile/joeh...
joehud.bsky.social
Best place to read rebel marketing is Cliff Bob's work, one of the originals on the topic.

Interesting thing to consider re:terrorism. I guess it depends on whether we treat "terrorist" as merely a slur versus an empirical descriptor. A lot of these groups do use terrorism as one of their tactics.
joehud.bsky.social
Finally, we don't think these concerns mean all rebel marketing is bad. Sometimes, the rebels might be better than the state and legitimizing them might be straightforwardly ethical. That's a separate debate. We just want conflict scholars to intentionally think about this ethical consideration.
7/8
Text excerpt from Huang and Huddleston's "Are we marketing rebellion?"
joehud.bsky.social
We don't have complete answers to the question of what to do about this. Definitely don't stop doing research. But DO think about how your work is useful to these actors, and DO be aware of biases built into your data collection during fieldwork.
6/8
Text excerpt from Huang and Huddleston's "Are we marketing rebellion?"
joehud.bsky.social
Moreover, many scholars are incentivized to write for larger audiences, so these effects can be magnified. And rebel leaders themselves read and cite our work more than you might think, and may directly use it in their marketing efforts.
5/8
Text excerpt from Huang and Huddleston's "Are we marketing rebellion?"
joehud.bsky.social
Next, this might be true even if scholars' (and journalists') coverage is negative, or normatively condemnatory. It can still raise their profiles and give them bargaining leverage, like it did severe abuse by rebels in the DRC.
4/8
Text excerpt from Huang and Huddleston's "Are we marketing rebellion?"
joehud.bsky.social
I don't like long threads, so let me keep it punchy. Our first point is that scholarship on rebels can be useful as rebel legitimation. Our work sometimes inadvertently plays into their hands, and conflict scholars need to think about how.
3/8
Text excerpt from Huang and Huddleston's "Are we marketing rebellion?"
joehud.bsky.social
Cliff Bob's book famously put journalism, TV, and other media in the category of marketing by rebel groups, but what about scholarship? Does it matter that our research is sometimes useful to violent nonstate actors? When and how is scholarship useful to them, and what can scholars do about it?
2/8
Abstract of Huang and Huddleston's article "Are we marketing rebellion?"
joehud.bsky.social
I've seen plenty of AI slop, and I too, hate it. And very much agreed about writing=thinking. But that's not the point in question here, is it?

But I didn't see @afinetheorem.bsky.social advocating writing substitution use cases. It seems clear to me it's designed to complement instruction.
joehud.bsky.social
But I get that others are worried that admin will then saddle me with a 4-4, not hire people. etc. I also worry about that.
joehud.bsky.social
It does seem like it wouldn't help much at all in writing classes, but seems great for my methods class, even parts of my conflict class.

If a chat can answer the midnight qs like "When is our final?" and "Which assignment counts the most?", my life would get easier. 3-3 is a lot of work!
joehud.bsky.social
Initial 2 reactions.

Good: Wow, an AI that has read my syllabus and all my slides/readings will probably give better answers to my students than rando internet AIs at 3am.

Evil: Wow, a lot of people think this AI could replace TAs. I guess we finally have a solution to the overproduction of PhDs.
afinetheorem.bsky.social
Super excited to publicly launch "All Day TA" (http://www.alldayta.com), a product @joshgans.bsky.social and I have been working on with our team over the last year. Short version: if you teach in spring, you will want to use this! It's the future of higher education. A short thread: 1/x
joehud.bsky.social
It's real colleagues, who are behaving as trolls and undermining any conversation about their important and (perhaps) dire point. Like he said, it's an empirical question, but all I see is assertion w/o evidence.

This tool looks useful for at least a few courses at my R2 (where there's no TAs).
joehud.bsky.social
Someone please help Mr Lizard get Big Scooter to make things right (preferably not Luigi-style).
lizardky.bsky.social
So, looking for legal advice, fortunately not for anything dramatic.
My wife is disabled.
Around March, she bought an electric scooter which lets her get around our small town - church, post office, grocery, about a 2-mile range. This helped her greatly.
A few months later, it stopped working. 1/?