I was expecting to see Rainbolt pop in with “alright, let’s see it.”

That’s not what Peter Dinklage’s issue was—it was with using dwarfs at all. He called out the contradiction: “You’re progressive in one way but you’re still making that fucking backward story of seven dwarves living in the cave. What the fuck are you doing, man?”

We are really taking this analogy to the max and I’m here for it.

I got this just for you, friend: ~

Yep, and it turns out that it was 50% of the hens.

I assume Betteridge's law of headlines applies here.

Wolfgang’s commentaries are the best. And yes, I listened to all three hours of Das Boot.

Deep, deep breaths.

It certainly is. The concern is that cheap knockoffs may overshadow and undermine better, albeit more expensive, original art.

And obviously not the first time we’ve faced these choices.

As someone who has written a terrible screenplay, of course not!

Maybe for the sake of discussion, I would define a non-creative as someone with neither experience in nor interest in the creative process.

No. I’m not worried about AI garbage art replacing garbage art.

But I don’t think it’s a given that non-creatives using AI will only produce low-quality work. But I believe art imbued with authentic human experience should be more sublime.

Ultimately, the market will settle this debate.

It’s not creatives using AI that gives me pause—it’s the non-creatives, those who don’t understand craft, thinking, “I can do that with ChatGPT!”

One of Elfman’s best, and maybe the least Elfmanesque.

Look! We have the whole place to ourselves!