Hutch++
@johnhutch.bsky.social
Incrementally better than other Hutches.
Chasing rabbits, collecting hobbies.
In my spare time, I run swiftkickweb.com
Chasing rabbits, collecting hobbies.
In my spare time, I run swiftkickweb.com
Also the video wouldn’t play.
On the whole it sounds like a very cool idea, but it seems to me at least as a case of self-QA, where things that are obvious to the dev(s) are only obvious to them cause they built them and only know how their own mind works.
Either way, def gonna check back soon.
On the whole it sounds like a very cool idea, but it seems to me at least as a case of self-QA, where things that are obvious to the dev(s) are only obvious to them cause they built them and only know how their own mind works.
Either way, def gonna check back soon.
February 10, 2026 at 5:53 PM
Also the video wouldn’t play.
On the whole it sounds like a very cool idea, but it seems to me at least as a case of self-QA, where things that are obvious to the dev(s) are only obvious to them cause they built them and only know how their own mind works.
Either way, def gonna check back soon.
On the whole it sounds like a very cool idea, but it seems to me at least as a case of self-QA, where things that are obvious to the dev(s) are only obvious to them cause they built them and only know how their own mind works.
Either way, def gonna check back soon.
Aside from not knowing what they do, it wasn’t clear why to do it. Some things like stamina are immediately understood, but then the gamification mentioned in the learn more — collecting rare post-cards, compiling decks, etc. — didn’t present itself as an obvious interaction anywhere.
February 10, 2026 at 5:53 PM
Aside from not knowing what they do, it wasn’t clear why to do it. Some things like stamina are immediately understood, but then the gamification mentioned in the learn more — collecting rare post-cards, compiling decks, etc. — didn’t present itself as an obvious interaction anywhere.
A hopefully helpful comment from fellow UX designer:
Just tried it and honestly I found it fairly indecipherable. At least, the mobile site. Didn’t try desktop.
Many of the icons had little implicit meaning to me. Or the understood meaning didn’t translate to this context.
Just tried it and honestly I found it fairly indecipherable. At least, the mobile site. Didn’t try desktop.
Many of the icons had little implicit meaning to me. Or the understood meaning didn’t translate to this context.
February 10, 2026 at 5:53 PM
A hopefully helpful comment from fellow UX designer:
Just tried it and honestly I found it fairly indecipherable. At least, the mobile site. Didn’t try desktop.
Many of the icons had little implicit meaning to me. Or the understood meaning didn’t translate to this context.
Just tried it and honestly I found it fairly indecipherable. At least, the mobile site. Didn’t try desktop.
Many of the icons had little implicit meaning to me. Or the understood meaning didn’t translate to this context.
Niagara Falls, frankie angel
January 9, 2026 at 3:56 AM
Niagara Falls, frankie angel
Reposted by Hutch++
And here's a quick-and-dirty composite of the two available videos, showing the victim's car allowing other cars to go by before pulling away.
January 7, 2026 at 6:54 PM
And here's a quick-and-dirty composite of the two available videos, showing the victim's car allowing other cars to go by before pulling away.
You didn’t hear? She started a second career as a hockey player. Total goon Flyers giving her a trial.
January 7, 2026 at 3:06 AM
You didn’t hear? She started a second career as a hockey player. Total goon Flyers giving her a trial.
Narrator voice: they didn’t.
January 7, 2026 at 2:43 AM
Narrator voice: they didn’t.