@jolorich.bsky.social
I don’t have TikTok, what does he say?
January 28, 2025 at 9:18 PM
I don’t have TikTok, what does he say?
I’ve heard of worse uses of your free time!
January 25, 2025 at 8:50 PM
I’ve heard of worse uses of your free time!
You’re missing Greenland!
January 25, 2025 at 8:48 PM
You’re missing Greenland!
Is that useless?
January 17, 2025 at 3:08 PM
Is that useless?
I agree they do make mistakes butIt depends on the fine-tuning of the model and what information you’re asking.
A good approach is to ask it to verify information or check the internet for sources.
Again, the tool is not the problem, it’s how you use it.
A good approach is to ask it to verify information or check the internet for sources.
Again, the tool is not the problem, it’s how you use it.
January 17, 2025 at 2:56 PM
I agree they do make mistakes butIt depends on the fine-tuning of the model and what information you’re asking.
A good approach is to ask it to verify information or check the internet for sources.
Again, the tool is not the problem, it’s how you use it.
A good approach is to ask it to verify information or check the internet for sources.
Again, the tool is not the problem, it’s how you use it.
You can only spot SOME pieces….😉
January 17, 2025 at 1:11 PM
You can only spot SOME pieces….😉
Not arguing Big Man—just discussing. If I wanted ChatGPT to do it for me, I’d be a hell of a lot more persuasive.
January 17, 2025 at 12:37 PM
Not arguing Big Man—just discussing. If I wanted ChatGPT to do it for me, I’d be a hell of a lot more persuasive.
Agreed.
Personally it’s massively increased my productivity in the workplace and therefore my earnings.
I cant say anything else apart from that 🤷
Good debate 👏👐
Personally it’s massively increased my productivity in the workplace and therefore my earnings.
I cant say anything else apart from that 🤷
Good debate 👏👐
January 17, 2025 at 12:08 PM
Agreed.
Personally it’s massively increased my productivity in the workplace and therefore my earnings.
I cant say anything else apart from that 🤷
Good debate 👏👐
Personally it’s massively increased my productivity in the workplace and therefore my earnings.
I cant say anything else apart from that 🤷
Good debate 👏👐
As for ‘shoving it down our throats,’ I’d argue it’s more about encouraging the public to find helpful applications. It’s not my place to convince you, but dismissing it as a con feels shortsighted. AI isn’t going away, and ignoring it may mean missing opportunities.
January 17, 2025 at 11:56 AM
As for ‘shoving it down our throats,’ I’d argue it’s more about encouraging the public to find helpful applications. It’s not my place to convince you, but dismissing it as a con feels shortsighted. AI isn’t going away, and ignoring it may mean missing opportunities.
I was trying to say that spell check and predictive text—the everyday tools we all use—are as basic, if not more so, than modern language models. Yet we don’t typically consider those to be AI. This highlights that what we call AI today often builds on existing technologies we’ve taken for granted.
January 17, 2025 at 11:55 AM
I was trying to say that spell check and predictive text—the everyday tools we all use—are as basic, if not more so, than modern language models. Yet we don’t typically consider those to be AI. This highlights that what we call AI today often builds on existing technologies we’ve taken for granted.
I would wholeheartedly disagree about it being a con. AI isn’t just LLMs. Sure, there are grifters and chancers who’ll slap a shiny wrapper on existing tools and push unnecessary use cases, but the underlying tech itself is absolutely not a con
January 17, 2025 at 11:38 AM
I would wholeheartedly disagree about it being a con. AI isn’t just LLMs. Sure, there are grifters and chancers who’ll slap a shiny wrapper on existing tools and push unnecessary use cases, but the underlying tech itself is absolutely not a con
We don’t all have academics in our back pockets.
I do have 4o.
I do have 4o.
January 17, 2025 at 11:29 AM
We don’t all have academics in our back pockets.
I do have 4o.
I do have 4o.
It’s machine learning, which is under the umbrella of AI.
Where we all personally draw the line on what is AI or not is all a bit of a boiled frog syndrome.
Where we all personally draw the line on what is AI or not is all a bit of a boiled frog syndrome.
January 17, 2025 at 11:27 AM
It’s machine learning, which is under the umbrella of AI.
Where we all personally draw the line on what is AI or not is all a bit of a boiled frog syndrome.
Where we all personally draw the line on what is AI or not is all a bit of a boiled frog syndrome.
I think that’s just an issue with use rather than the tool itself.
You don’t ask it to give you the answer; you ask it to tutor you so you can learn.
Humans are lazy—that’s not the software’s fault. We just need to be better with the tools we have available.
You don’t ask it to give you the answer; you ask it to tutor you so you can learn.
Humans are lazy—that’s not the software’s fault. We just need to be better with the tools we have available.
January 17, 2025 at 10:54 AM
I think that’s just an issue with use rather than the tool itself.
You don’t ask it to give you the answer; you ask it to tutor you so you can learn.
Humans are lazy—that’s not the software’s fault. We just need to be better with the tools we have available.
You don’t ask it to give you the answer; you ask it to tutor you so you can learn.
Humans are lazy—that’s not the software’s fault. We just need to be better with the tools we have available.
I would disagree.
“AI, write me a news story” and “AI, help me correct my spelling, grammar, and point out any holes in my thought process” are very different ways of using the tools available to us.
It’s about using AI to enhance your work, not to do it for you—at least, that’s how I see it.
“AI, write me a news story” and “AI, help me correct my spelling, grammar, and point out any holes in my thought process” are very different ways of using the tools available to us.
It’s about using AI to enhance your work, not to do it for you—at least, that’s how I see it.
January 17, 2025 at 8:26 AM
I would disagree.
“AI, write me a news story” and “AI, help me correct my spelling, grammar, and point out any holes in my thought process” are very different ways of using the tools available to us.
It’s about using AI to enhance your work, not to do it for you—at least, that’s how I see it.
“AI, write me a news story” and “AI, help me correct my spelling, grammar, and point out any holes in my thought process” are very different ways of using the tools available to us.
It’s about using AI to enhance your work, not to do it for you—at least, that’s how I see it.