I am a little surprised that they didn't include AI tutors as a category, though.

And the report is full of useful information, figures, etc. For example, this is a good categorization of AI in EDU

So, naturally, it highlights risk. This wasn't some open-ended exploration of whether AI is "good" or "bad". Brookings purposefully set out to explore risks and how they might be mitigated. That's perfectly fine, and the report should be read through that lens.

"Unlike a postmortem, which examines failure after occurrence, the 'prospective insight' gained from a premortem helps to anticipate potential issues with any innovation so they can be corrected or mitigated before norms of use become entrenched..."

Oh, y'know, just sleeping with her security guards

I mean, *I* think so...

I wear it proudly

Care for my thoughts on JJ McCarthy?

(I don't actually have any)

bsky.app/profile/norl...

This time, yes

So...

I mute

Ah, yes, everyone's favorite self-appointed education journalism critic... sigh.

Evergreen

I root for two teams (VCU and Duke) that suck at FTs and are not very good defensively. It's very frustrating.