Jordan Moffatt
@jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
110 followers 140 following 43 posts
Writer (municipal issues and cycling in Ottawa), author (fiction) Website: https://jordanmoffatt.website/ Newsletter: https://jordobicycles.substack.com/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
Thanks Ariel. If you're interested, you can read my thoughts on the plan here: jordobicycles.substack.com/p/gladstone-...

(I'm happy to learn you're considering extending two-way cycling on Percy to Gilmour—one day I hope Percy is two-way for cyclists to Laurier.)
Gladstone-Gilmour bikeway will boost cycling in Centretown...
...But bike lanes all the way down Gladstone are still needed
jordobicycles.substack.com
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
My newest newsletter post over at Ottawa 3 Speed: A review of the proposed bike lanes on Gladstone Avenue and Gilmour Street.

Westbound contra-flow lane on Gilmour! Protected intersection at Rochester! Weird, convoluted crossing of Bronson! #ottbike

jordobicycles.substack.com/p/gladstone-...
Gladstone-Gilmour bikeway will boost cycling in Centretown...
...But bike lanes all the way down Gladstone are still needed
jordobicycles.substack.com
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
These do lower speeds—at least early in the year, before drivers get used to them. (Avg reduction of 5kph and +25% in speed limit compliance.) But they're also effective at squeezing cyclists. City doesn't always try to slow speeds *and* make cycling comfortable bc it's harder and more expensive.
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
I’ve been wondering about this!
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
Successfully defended my Master's thesis! "The development of residential zoning bylaws in Ottawa, 1946–1965" coming soon to a PDF download near you...
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
Thank you, William. Seeing someone else ask that question made all the research worth it (for me, anyway). Btw, I spoke with Councillor Menard's office after writing the piece and they confirmed there are no plans to work on Mutchmor any time soon.
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
This could be fixed by allowing mixed crossings and letting cyclists cross on the walk signal on existing intersections like your example (separated facilities should still be encouraged on rebuilds). But I don't think the current provincial government is eager to reform cycling law.
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
Earnest answer: It's illegal under the Highway Traffic Act for cyclists to ride in a crosswalk. To make crossing on a bike legal, the city would have to install separate cyclist light signals and paint the crossing differently. That costs more and takes up more space than a walk-your-bike sign.
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
That lane closed sign is also facing the wrong direction. Cyclists going the right way will only see the back of it.
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
(This came soon after the NCC built its pathway system. Conflicts between pedestrians and cyclists on the new paths were rising—including one incident when someone threw tacks on the ground near Westboro Beach to puncture bike tires.)
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
I was surprised to learn today that there used to be bike lanes on Colonel By Drive.

The lanes were installed in 1972, but I'm not sure when they were removed. With the pathways getting busier, this is something that @ncc-ccn.bsky.social should consider bringing back—there's a precedent for it.
Newspaper clipping showing a photo and caption of a cyclist using a freshly-painted bike lane.
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
Why did the CoA reject the application? They sided with neighbours who opposed it. Some had the typical issues with shadows, parking, and bias against renters (who apparently don't volunteer). One neighbour was also worried that the development would displace raccoons who lived in the culvert.
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
One reason why the missing middle is missing: it takes a full year for the Ontario Land Tribunal to overturn a rogue ruling by the Committee of Adjustment, who rejected two 8-unit apartment buildings (two 6 unit buildings were allowed by right) against the opinion of City of Ottawa planners.
jleiper.bsky.social
Two very interesting OLT decisions in the past few days. The tribunal removed heritage designation from 501 Cole (no decision yet online), and overturned the Committee of Adjustment's refusal at 370 Princeton (www.canlii.org/en/on/onlt/d...).
www.canlii.org
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
Though this discriminatory intent is not explicit (in official plans or the PPS), the lack of solid planning ground to ban the “gentle density” of low-rise multiplexes—more likely to be considered “reasonable” to allow—might leave an opening for a Charter challenge on section 15. (4/4)
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
However, the history of exclusionary residential zoning shows examples that these bylaws were purposefully introduced to limit housing options for renters, lower classes, and racialized residents in certain areas (i.e. discriminatory). (3/4)
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
This is unlikely: Courts generally assume municipal bylaws follow the standards of professional planning when adhering to provincial laws, and therefore would not intervene (bylaws are inherently discriminatory, and so discretion to protect the public or provincial interest is assumed). (2/4)
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
Longer answer (1/4): A legal challenge to municipal zoning would have to show that it exceeded the powers granted to it by provincial legislation, or that such legislation was unreasonable or discriminatory to begin with.
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
Short answer: Canada doesn’t really have a Euclid equivalent. Some interesting cases went to Surpreme Court in early zoning days, such as Scarborough v. Bondi. https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1959/1959canlii7/1959canlii7.html
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
(I flagged this with the City in November, and they told me they were "working on a solution." The project manager has since left the department, and nothing was done.)
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
Cyclists will no doubt just proceed on the driver/pedestrian green. If they then get hit by a right-turning driver, the cyclist will be blamed for disobeying their signal—even though they should have had a green! The City is creating this risky situation.
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
Percy & Catherine intersection: drivers get a green light, pedestrians get a walk signal, but cyclists (in between) get a red light. I can't think of any rational explanation for this set-up, and I don't think it exists anywhere else in the city (anybody know?) @arieltroster.com can you fix this?
jordanmoffatt.bsky.social
They really did it.
ncc-ccn.gc.ca
Swimming at the Dow’s Lake recreational dock starts today, June 12! ✨

📍 Dow’s Lake
🏊‍♂️ Swimming is allowed every day
🧪 We have conducted robust testing within the swim area

#ottnews