It’s almost like it’s trying to set the evidentiary bar that already exists beyond defamation, because actual malice only requires clear and convincing evidence. What I’m unsure of is if this would wipe out any defamation suit brought by someone, and that higher bar would have to be met

Eh, I don’t think it cuts that way. I’m reading this pretty plainly. If someone accuses a parent of abuse, and lodges a complaint, and that is not true, then there are financial damages. That seems to be pretty cut and dry. What’s confusing is that it’s coming from a side that has made false claims

Making this even more confusing as to why ~she~proposed this. I’m running through the implications and…it can’t bode well for someone, say, falsely accusing an uncle of “grooming” his nephew.

Here's the link to the event, if anyone wants to go: www.eventcreate.com/e/eots2025

This is fun

Bigger question: if on Twitter you made Tweets, what are we making on here? Blueys?