Oh wait I just saw something else worse, and you’re a direct participant.

Yeah, sorry Julian.

Julian, I read on the interwebz that much of the academy is involved in “sloppy argumentation, overbroad claims, dismissive derision” re citizenship question.

In responses, OP mentions silos, and lack of curiosity of left-leaning academics.

Good luck in the trenches; not much else to say.

I actually find this pleasing when it happens—I find my notes from a few years ago and think this son of a gun is smart only to find that I wrote it!!!

Ah you’re suggesting a possible flow out of Netflix post merger; missed that. Fair point, though, whether it would constrain them isn’t unclear as you say.

Also, I’d be surprised if teens buy their own subscription or if Netflix becoming an attractive option would turn them towards it. Netflix isn’t a competitor at all in the content category this demographic seems to want.

Hey, while I agree with the rest of the thread, not sure the news contradicts the claim. Unclear that absence of those short-form videos feed services will bring Netflix subscriptions, and conversely unclear their presence hinders people from subscribing to Netflix. Too many confounding factors.

Is there a hashtag or something for requests like this?

Thank you!

Hey! Could you please say a bit more about the setup? What app do you use? The hardware setup?

Ad(d)led tweeters say that if a fraction of what’s alleged in this dissent is true, the majority’s author has engaged in corrosive behavior. That’s certainly a take.

Haha! Thank you for this!

(Hope you’re well!)

AND ALSO why purposivism is just another word for “doing law the normal way”, but you people aren’t ready for that truth yet 😾

(See esp his remarks about Fed Soc vis-a-vis LL.)

This is from his social media:

How does this happen? Wouldn’t you at least as a matter of duty to your client, especially when they’re already in the most fortunate situation of prosecution reversal, try to get him out in the right way?

If it’s there, your brief should say it. It’s not for a judge to go hunting for a constitutional theory on behalf of parties.

I mean none of these people can argue about the issue at hand without zooming out where everything looks like everything else. I don’t need lectures about academic enterprise when “the whole literature” wasn’t before the judge.