Kasimir Dederichs
@kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
400 followers 420 following 24 posts
Postdoctoral Prize Research Fellow in Sociology at @NuffieldCollege @UniofOxford | social integration, voluntary organizations, residential segregation, intermarriage
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
New Open Access paper published in PNAS Nexus! “Ingroup preferences, segregation, and intergroup contact in neighborhoods and civic organizations” with my co-authors Rob Franken, @dingemanwiertz.bsky.social, and Jochem Tolsma. doi.org/10.1093/pnas... Thread below.
doi.org
Reposted by Kasimir Dederichs
pnasnexus.org
A Dutch study explores a key barrier to social integration: strong in-group preferences. One hopeful exception: young people don’t have strong preferences for people of their own ethnicity when it comes to sports activities. In PNAS Nexus: academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ar...
Street soccer championship in The Hague, Netherlands, 2010.
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
Overall, our paper underscores the pervasiveness of ingroup preferences. It’s difficult to tackle segregation by just targeting meeting opportunities. Measures to support preference change are also needed (e.g., programs promoting tolerance and acceptance).
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
Experiment 3 shows that respondents prefer their ingroups to a similar degree, regardless of whether the composition of their entire club or the team is concerned (with whom they would spend most time). This suggests that segregation likely ‘adds up’ at each decision node in the setting selection.
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
These ingroup preferences are stronger among individuals who are currently part of neighborhoods or civic organizations with larger proportions of ingroup members.
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
Older individuals prefer settings where more people are above 50 and Dutch people without a migration background prefer settings with fewer people of Turkish or Moroccan origin. The only exception are individuals without university education, who display no ingroup preferences regarding education.
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
For example, respondents with a college degree were on average willing to travel 6 minutes further from their neighborhood to key amenities or from their home to a civic organization if that would mean the respective setting had 75 instead of 25% college-educated members.
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
Experiments 1 & 2 then showed that people consistently prefer settings with more ingroup members. These preferences are sizable and our experimental setup allows us to express them in terms of additional travel time they are willing to incur.
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
First, we asked respondents about the composition of their current neighborhoods and organizations and the composition of the people they regularly interact with. For all dimensions studied (age, ethnicity, education), segregation is stronger in civic organizations vis-à-vis neighborhoods.
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
We fielded survey modules including three conjoint experiments in two high-quality samples of the population in the Netherlands (LISS and TRIAL). What are the findings?
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
We identify ingroup preferences using a set of conjoint experiments, looking at how individuals choose between neighborhoods and civic organizations (e.g., sports clubs, cultural associations) with different social compositions.
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
Many people live their lives in social bubbles, i.e., segregated settings that offer little opportunity for intergroup contact. Such segregation may emerge from ingroup preferences or opportunity constraints. Both are difficult to distinguish by only looking at the social settings people end up in.
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
New Open Access paper published in PNAS Nexus! “Ingroup preferences, segregation, and intergroup contact in neighborhoods and civic organizations” with my co-authors Rob Franken, @dingemanwiertz.bsky.social, and Jochem Tolsma. doi.org/10.1093/pnas... Thread below.
doi.org
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
Honored that my thesis was selected for the second place of this year's ECSR best thesis award. I feel very grateful for everyone who supported me during this journey! 😊
nuffieldcollege.bsky.social
Congratulations to Nuffield Postdoctoral Prize Research Fellows Said Hassan and Kasimir Dederichs who have been awarded first and second ECSR Prize for best PhD thesis, respectively, for their Nuffield College DPhil theses!

Read more: www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/news-events/...
Reposted by Kasimir Dederichs
ruettenauer.bsky.social
Excited and grateful to launch my ERC project #SOCIO-CLIMP 🌍🌤️

The project explores how #ClimateChange and #EnvironmentalHazards unequally affect different socio-demographic groups 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 across Europe — combining spatial climate data with demographic detail to uncover patterns of #ClimateInjustice.
erc.europa.eu
📣 The ERC Starting Grant call results are out!

Find out which early-career researchers will receive funding this year, what they will be investigating, where they will be based... plus lots of other #ERCStG facts & figures for 2025!

➡️ buff.ly/IsafuFh

#FrontierResearch 🇪🇺#EUfunded #HorizonEurope
Reposted by Kasimir Dederichs
ruettenauer.bsky.social
@kasimirdederichs.bsky.social just presented our paper on #ResidentialSegregation 🏘️ across Europe at #ECSR in Cologne.

Very impressed by a packed Residential Segregation session at the end of the conference🧐 - cool #ECSR crowed😎
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
Inviting everyone to this term's Nuffield #Sociology Seminar starting next week. Looking forward to a series of great speakers! @jwied.bsky.social @cdiehl.bsky.social Eva Jaspers @marioluissmall.bsky.social Christina Eller @mivich.bsky.social and Malte Döhne. @nuffieldcollege.bsky.social
saidhassan.bsky.social
🗓️ Excited to share our Sociology Seminar Series for this term at Nuffield College! @nuffieldcollege.bsky.social

Join us every Wednesday at 4 pm from next week

#Sociology #Stratification #Inequality
Reposted by Kasimir Dederichs
hudde.bsky.social
Ab in den Druck!🎉

Mein Buch „Wo wir wie wählen: Politische Muster in Deutschlands Nachbarschaften“ ab 18.06. bei Campus

Eine politische Landkarte🇩🇪 basierend auf Wahldaten, Sozialstruktur & Eindrücken vor Ort

Jetzt vorbestellen—in eurer Lieblingsbuchhandlung oder hier www.campus.de/buecher-camp...
Das Bild zeigt das Cover des Buchs Das Bild zeigt die Rückseite des Covers:

Hat sich Deutschland politisch auseinandergelebt? Grenzen sich Anhänger der unterschiedlichen politischen Gruppen auch räumlich vermehrt voneinander ab? Finden wir politisch typische und untypische Orte eher in den Metropolen, in den mittleren und kleineren Städten oder auf dem Land? In Ost- oder in Westdeutschland? Mit einem einzigartigen Datenschatz zum Wahlverhalten in allen 94.000 Wahlbezirken Deutschlands geht Ansgar Hudde diesen Fragen nach und entdeckt: Die Mehrheit der Deutschen lebt nicht in politischen Blasen, sondern in Nachbarschaften, deren Wahlverhalten grob dem Bundestrend entspricht.

Das Buch verknüpft die Analyse von Wahlergebnissen mit sozialstrukturellen Daten und Gesprächen vor Ort und zeichnet dadurch kenntnisreich Lokalporträts ausgewählter deutscher Orte. Hudde identifiziert vier Wahlmuster in Deutschlands Nachbarschaften: das politische Typischdeutschland, vor allem in westdeutschen Klein- und Mittelstädten, das Konservativ-Wahlmuster im ländlichen Bayern, das AfD-trifft-Linke-Wahlmuster in Ostdeutschland jenseits der Großstadtzentren und das Grün-Links-Wahlmuster in den zentrumsnahen Vierteln von Metropolen und Universitätsstädten. Wer diese Wahlmuster kennt und ein Bild von den charakteristischen Orten und Nachbarschaften vor Augen hat, kennt nicht nur Deutschlands politische Landkarte, sondern gewinnt auch ein tieferes Verständnis der Bundesrepublik insgesamt. Eine aufschlussreiche Analyse, die auch die Bundestagswahl 2025 einschließt!

 

»Ansgar Hudde entwickelt in seinem Buch eine Kartografie des Wahlverhaltens, die eindrücklich zeigt: Orte und Regionen machen einen Unterschied. Deutschland tickt sehr anders, je nachdem, wo man sich befindet. Eine willkommene Landkarte zur Navigation durch die politische Landschaft.« Steffen Mau
Reposted by Kasimir Dederichs
drtomemery.bsky.social
This is one of the most exciting parts of our calendar. Apply to SICSS-ODISSEI!
odissei.bsky.social
Calling all PhD students, postdocs & early-career researchers📣
Apply for the SICSS-ODISSEI Summer School (June 16–27, 2025) at @erasmusuniversity.bsky.social

📚 Topics: network analysis, ML, ethics
💻 FIRMBACKBONE & ODISSEI supercomputer (OSSC)
🎓 Earn 5 ECTS credits

🗓️ Deadline Feb 28
🔗 edu.nl/bxwxc
SICSS-ODISSEI Summer School 2025 - ODISSEI – Open Data Infrastructure for Social Science and Economic Innovations
From 16 to 27 June 2025, ODISSEI is hosting its fourth summer school at Erasmus University in Rotterdam, as part of the Summer Institutes in Computational Social Science (SICSS) and the Erasmus Gradua...
edu.nl
Reposted by Kasimir Dederichs
hudde.bsky.social
🎉ECSR Conference 2025 is coming to Cologne!🎉

📅 3-5 September 2025
📅 Abstract deadline: Jan 31st
ℹ️ Details: ecsr2025.eu

I'm happy to be on the organizing team.

Theme: "Demography & Social Inequality" – but submissions from *all* sociology fields, methodical approaches etc. are welcome.

#ECSR2025
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
Thus, additional efforts are necessary to improve intergroup relations through civic life. More in the paper...
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
While there are certainly organizations out there working very hard and successfully to promote integration, our findings suggest that overall, social sorting dynamics remain pervasive in civic life - both across and within civic organisations.
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
... ethnic majority members form fewer social connections in organizations with larger shares of ethnic outgroup members and are more likely to leave them. This increased dropout risk can partially be attributed to their weaker social integration in those organizations.
kasimirdederichs.bsky.social
We then focus on respondents who are involved in multiple organizations simultaneously (e.g., a football club and a choir). When comparing these organizational affiliations *within* respondents, we find that ...