Kate Shaw
@kateshaw.bsky.social
74K followers 1.1K following 99 posts
Law prof @Penn, cohost Strict Scrutiny podcast
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
kateshaw.bsky.social
Great guide to what’s on the ballot in November - including three Democratic justices on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court up for retention
taniel.bsky.social
for the weekend crowd: take a moment today to explore what's on the ballot next month!

it's not all about NYC, VA, and NJ: i put together a guide of the 180+ key races you should know about, across 32 states.

explore, & find the ones that interest you the most, here: boltsmag.org/whats-on-the...
kateshaw.bsky.social
ICYMI:
plawpu.bsky.social
Read the full piece at the link 🔗: www.nytimes.com/2025/09/30/o...

#PLAW #LawatPrinceton #supremecourt

@kateshaw.bsky.social
kateshaw.bsky.social
Sat down with @stevevladeck.bsky.social & @williambaude.bsky.social to talk start of a new SCOTUS term, end of an unprecedented summer on the shadow docket, & 20 years of Chief Justice John Roberts

www.nytimes.com/2025/09/30/o...
Opinion | ‘Hypercharged’ Is the Only Word for This Supreme Court
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Kate Shaw
leahlitman.bsky.social
the case against comey is an illegal, selective, vindictive prosecution. Trump vowed vengeance and retribution; prosecutors concluded there was no case against comey; Trump forced out the prosecutors & replaced them with a loyalist who got an indictment.

The case should be dismissed before trial.
kateshaw.bsky.social
Finally had a chance to watch this, and it’s very much worth your time if you haven’t - late night tv as a site of popular constitutionalism
kateshaw.bsky.social
A fantastic installment of @stevevladeck.bsky.social’s (always essential) newsletter
stevevladeck.bsky.social
For today's bonus "One First," I wrote about the increasingly noisy claim that legal constraints don't really matter in the current moment—why it's utterly belied by what's actually happening on the ground (and by what law can actually *do*); and why, in many respects, it's affirmatively dangerous:
Bonus 176: Law, Lawlessness, and Doomerism
Law is not—and never will be—a perfect constraint on government action. But claims that legal limits have become wholly irrelevant to the current administration are not just wrong; they're dangerous.
www.stevevladeck.com
kateshaw.bsky.social
Also - we recorded this episode before the court’s NIH funding order, but I think the divided result in that case was broadly consistent with the admin’s winning streak at SCOTUS over this past/spring summer. Cc @stevevladeck.bsky.social whose work tracking the shadow docket is absolutely crucial
kateshaw.bsky.social
There’s so much more to say about SCOTUS, but one thing I hope came through in this convo is what a winning streak Trump is on at SCOTUS right now - & how insane it is that the court is blessing many of his assertions of executive authority w/o a word of explanation @strictscrutiny.bsky.social
leahlitman.bsky.social
Listen to my wonderful cohost Kate Shaw @kateshaw.bsky.social talking with Ezra Klein about the Supreme Court and Trump!!

A must-listen conversation - in part because if Kate & Ezra are where they are on SCOTUS ... it's a 5 alarm+ fire! @strictscrutiny.bsky.social

www.nytimes.com/2025/09/02/o...
Opinion | The Supreme Court Is Backing Trump’s Power Grab
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Kate Shaw
leahlitman.bsky.social
Here's an interview Kate Shaw @kateshaw.bsky.social did with Lev Menand, the expert on the Fed (the headline does not capture the substance of the piece): www.nytimes.com/2025/08/27/o...
Opinion | Will the Supreme Court Put Real Limits on This President? Start With Lisa Cook.
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Kate Shaw
nytopinion.nytimes.com
Can President Trump fire Lisa Cook? Under a proper understanding of the Federal Reserve’s place in our constitutional order, says ‪Kate Shaw, the answer should be no.
Opinion | The Supreme Court Must Limit This President. Start With the Fed.
Trump’s effort to oust Lisa Cook could have all sorts of worrisome consequences.
nyti.ms
kateshaw.bsky.social
I sat down with Columbia Law School’s Lev Menand, a genuine expert on the Fed, to talk through Trump’s effort to remove Fed Governor Lisa Cook - and its implications for both Fed independence & what remains of the separation of powers

www.nytimes.com/2025/08/27/o...
Opinion | The Supreme Court Must Limit This President. Start With the Fed.
www.nytimes.com
kateshaw.bsky.social
A real treat to take a break from the horrors of this timeline to talk to my amazing @penncareylaw.bsky.social colleague @serenamayeri.bsky.social about her fantastic new book “Marital Privilege”
Reposted by Kate Shaw
strictscrutiny.bsky.social
NEW: The band is back together to chat legal news, including the shadow docket insanity on NIH research funding.

Then Leah chats with Eli Savit, candidate for Michigan AG, about threats to marriage equality

& Kate with Serena Mayeri on her book MARITAL PRIVILEGE
crooked.com/podcast/trum...
a close up of a girl 's face with the words why are you telling me all of this
Alt: a close up of a girl 's face with the words why are you telling me all of this
media.tenor.com
Reposted by Kate Shaw
jamellebouie.net
new piece from on the 60th anniversary of the voting rights act, and what the law has meant for american democracy www.nytimes.com/2025/08/06/o...
Opinion | Donald Trump and John Roberts Have a Lot in Common
www.nytimes.com
kateshaw.bsky.social
ICYMI - in the second half of this episode of @strictscrutiny.bsky.social, @leahlitman.bsky.social & I took a break from the news cycle to remember the one and only David Souter. Thanks to former Souter clerks Erin Delaney & Alli Orr Larsen for joining us & sharing some lovely Souter stories
leahlitman.bsky.social
What a return from vacation ... Kate & I do a whirlwind tour through the legal news (including some concerning fallout from SCOTUS's recent decision in Catholic Charities).

And then are joined for a delightful retrospective on Justice Souter by Alli Orr Larsen & Erin Delaney! Check it out!
strictscrutiny.bsky.social
NEW: we break down the legal angles of the Trump-Epstein … situation; cover SCOTUS’s fake & nonexistent reasoning on the shadow docket; & talk lower court happenings.

THEN-our Justice Souter retrospective with his former clerks, Profs. Alli Orr Larsen & Erin Delaney. crooked.com/podcast/can-...
Reposted by Kate Shaw
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
Bracing analysis from Columbia Law School’s David Pozen about the significance and implications of Columbia’s settlement with Trump. balkin.blogspot.com/2025/07/regu...
kateshaw.bsky.social
Urgent piece by @ambpressman.bsky.social about the dangers of capitulation to the administration - we know from Hungary what happens when “those best positioned to uphold democratic norms chose the comfort of an illusion over the courage of action”
ambpressman.bsky.social
Democracies collapse not just through force, but through the naïve self-confidence of elites. What should alarm us isn’t that strongmen follow similar playbooks, but that our elites do too. www.nytimes.com/2025/07/23/o...
Opinion | I Watched It Happen in Hungary. Now It’s Happening Here.
The real danger of a strongman isn’t his tactics; it’s how others, especially those with power, justify their acquiescence.
www.nytimes.com
kateshaw.bsky.social
& thanks to @stevevladeck.bsky.social & @mikesacks.bsky.social for rounding out the episode - bummed I missed the conversation but so great to have you both on! @strictscrutiny.bsky.social
kateshaw.bsky.social
The first segment of this episode of @strictscrutiny.bsky.social has an excellent overview of the legal questions surrounding the Iran strikes, via @becingber.bsky.social in conversation with @leahlitman.bsky.social
kateshaw.bsky.social
SCOTUS majority not deigning to give *any* reasons for staying the injunction of the district court - in the highest-possible stakes context & where the executive branch has acted appallingly - evincing real contempt for both district courts & the rule of law
stevevladeck.bsky.social
#BREAKING: Over a (sharp) public dissent from the three Democratic appointees, #SCOTUS clears the way for the Trump administration to remove migrants to third countries *without* giving them an additional opportunity to contest whether they face persecution or other forms of mistreatment there:
www.supremecourt.gov
kateshaw.bsky.social
Joining @thebrianlehrershow.bsky.social a bit later this morning to talk Trump & the courts, including whatever new opinions the Supreme Court issues today
thebrianlehrershow.bsky.social
Today:
- @elizabethkim.bsky.social on the NYC mayoral race,
- Middle East expert Robin Wright on Israel & Iran,
- @kateshaw.bsky.social on Trump & the courts, including SCOTUS

Live at 10 on 93.9 FM, AM820 or @wnyc.org
kateshaw.bsky.social
Brad is an incredible public servant and this is absolutely horrifying
bradlander.bsky.social
Hi, this is Meg Barnette, Brad's wife.

While escorting a defendant out of immigration court at 26 Federal Plaza, Brad was taken by masked agents and detained by ICE.

This is still developing, and our team is monitoring the situation closely.
kateshaw.bsky.social
Non-lawyers: this is….not how this is done
annabower.bsky.social
The Trump administration’s table of authorities in this filing:


TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
[INSERT]