Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Reposted by Katie Insel

Carl Zimmer @carlzimmer.com · 8h

Today my @nytimes.com colleagues and I are launching a new series called Lost Science. We interview US scientists who can no longer discover something new about our world, thanks to this year‘s cuts. Here is my first interview with a scientist who studied bees and fires. Gift link: nyti.ms/3IWXbiE

nyti.ms

53 950 2.2K

Reposted by Katie Insel

Megan Spurney @meganspurney.bsky.social · 9d

Delayed thank you to @fluxsociety.bsky.social for a wonderful meeting in Dublin earlier this month! Thank you to everyone who came to my poster on reward-motivated working memory across children, adolescents, and adults

1 3

Reposted by Katie Insel

Rosa Lafer-Sousa @rosalafersousa.bsky.social · 7d

🇺🇸 These dedicated public servants risked their careers to deliver an urgent message. 🚨

While the 1st amendment grants them the right to speak on matters of public concern, their protection is not guaranteed under an administration hostile to free speech.

Please take the time to listen and boost 🔥

Science and Freedom Alliance - SAFA @safa-science.bsky.social · 7d

Federal workers are speaking out on how the Trump regime is harming Americans:

"We stand here today at a moment of the greatest assault of our lifetimes on our freedoms. The US Constitution is being shredded... We are here to call on Congress to stand up and stop it."

youtu.be/uw1KwIBgrCw?...

Mark Histed, NIH Scientist *speaking in personal capacity

YouTube video by Civil Servants Coalition

youtu.be

2 54 130

Reposted by Katie Insel

Jenna Norton @jenna-m-norton.bsky.social · 7d

“American science, the gold-standard and world-leading science and innovation enterprise, is being destroyed….Congress has a rare moment of leverage to check Trump’s executive overreach and it must stand up and do so.”

- @markhisted.org, NIH neuroscientist

www.nature.com/articles/d41...

This US government shutdown is different: what it means for science

President Trump’s budget office lays out guidelines for mass lay-offs across the federal government.

www.nature.com

50 110

Reposted by Katie Insel

Neuromatch @neuromatch.bsky.social · 13d

Exciting news! 🎉 Our Computational Neuroscience course has been awarded NIH BRAIN Initiative funding! Students will get hands-on experience w real BRAIN Initiative datasets, helping them build computational skills that are essential for the future of neuroscience.

www.linkedin.com/feed/update/...

25 73

Reposted by Katie Insel

The Transmitter @thetransmitter.bsky.social · 26d

Help @thetransmitter.bsky.social and @neuromatch.bsky.social understand what early-career neuroscientists need. Take just a few minutes to fill out the survey: www.thetransmitter.org/early-career...

#neuroskyence

16 21

Reposted by Katie Insel

Adam Rothman enjoys a good sandwich @adamrothman.bsky.social · 22d

No 14-year-old should be tried as an adult. None.
www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/202...

House votes to charge D.C. 14-year-olds as adults

The House also voted to restrict judges from giving lighter sentences to young adults, among 14 D.C. crime-related policy proposals from the GOP.

www.washingtonpost.com

44 150 470

Reposted by Katie Insel

Jonathan Cohn @jonathancohn.bsky.social · 22d

8 Democrats just joined Republicans in voting to enable 14-year-olds in DC to be tried as adults:

Cuellar
Davis (NC)
Gillen
Golden
Lee (NV)
Min
Perez
Vindman

Harmful, heinous, counterproductive, and deeply racist

clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/rol...

60 440 1K

Reposted by Katie Insel

Michael W. Kraus @mwkraus.bsky.social · 22d

I wrote a little note on awards for diversity and science:
mwkraus.medium.com/a-note-on-aw...

1 12 36

Katie Insel @katieinsel.bsky.social · 22d

Yay congratulations!!!

1 1

Reposted by Katie Insel

Dr. David Miller 🏳️‍🌈 @davidimiller.bsky.social · 28d

So... where to go from here???

CONGRESS 👏 HAS 👏 POWER

Laws from Congress can help override this SCOTUS mess.

☎️ So tell your Senator to support Sen Baldwin's amendment to restore terminated NSF grants (or Durbin's for NIH)

🐘 *Especially* if you have a Repub Senator.

More context here:

Senate panel raises hopes that NSF will restore killed grants

Republicans promise to work with Democrats to salvage defeated amendment

www.science.org

1 3 7

Reposted by Katie Insel

Dr. David Miller 🏳️‍🌈 @davidimiller.bsky.social · Sep 1

🧪 And House appropriators say: no cuts to NIH budget!

House subcommittee version just came out (link below). Holds NIH flat at $48 billion.

To be clear: this is far from over. But a good sign that science still matters across both sides of aisle.

YOUR VOICE MATTERS!!

5 180 470

Reposted by Katie Insel

MagnoliaBouton @magnoliabouton.bsky.social · Aug 25

Listed are some of the many NIH research training programs that were terminated! Together, these programs supported thousands of trainees, whose careers are now in limbo. Such a great loss for discovery and innovation. We must protect our next generation of scientists!
#HandsOffNIH #ProtectScience

27 UNIHTED @27unihted.bsky.social · Aug 23

We LOVE our trainees ! From @nihvigils.bsky.social today ❤️❤️

1 29 53

Reposted by Katie Insel

Ian L Morgan @ianlmorgan.bsky.social · Aug 25

Great breakdown of the SCOTUS shadow docket ruling on NIH grants terminations by @strictscrutiny.bsky.social. Even though SCOTUS ruled that the grant recipients would likely succeed, they allowed the NIH to continue terminating the grants for now. My brain hurts from this one.

The Shadow Docket Just Won’t Quit

open.spotify.com

7 27 55

Katie Insel @katieinsel.bsky.social · Aug 23

This SCOTUS decision is not just about what words we can and cannot say in our grants. This ruling will destroy the careers of many scientists, and it will hit trainees and early career researchers the hardest. The future of scientific training and research innovation is at stake.

Jeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · Aug 23

I just sent this email to Director Bhattacharya and am sending him a hard copy by registered mail.

1/14

August 22, 2025

Dear Director Bhattacharya:

I write to you regarding your plans after the Supreme Court ruling yesterday. As you know, the Supreme Court did allow a stay on the required grant reinstatements based on a controversial jurisdictional issue but also found that the grant termination processes used were likely illegal.

I know you are deeply concerned about public trust in NIH. I hope that you understand that proceeding to fail to reinstate or to re-terminate grants that had been found to have been illegally terminated will not increase the public trust in NIH. This would also be substantially damaging to science.

1 29 86

Reposted by Katie Insel

Barred and Boujee aka Madiba Dennie @audrelawdamercy.bsky.social · Aug 22

Justice Jackson is basically reporting live from inside a garbage fire

www.ballsandstrikes.org/scotus/nih-c...

Ketanji Brown Jackson Stops Just Short of Saying the Supreme Court Is Breathtakingly Full of Shit

“Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this Administration always wins.”

www.ballsandstrikes.org

170 2.1K 7.5K

Reposted by Katie Insel

Math PC @mathienz.bsky.social · Aug 22

On today’s SCOTUS decision — “This is Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist,” Justice Jackson wrote. “Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this administration always wins.” — Justice Jackson’s dissent.
#NIH #StandUpForScience

1 1 1

Reposted by Katie Insel

Scott Delaney @scott-delaney.bsky.social · Aug 21

Full order is here: www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

SCOTUS stays (i.e., pauses) Judge Young's order insofar as it vacated (and thus reinstated) NIH grant terminations.

SCOTUS left in place the rest of Judge Young's order, which means NIH can't terminate more grants in the same way.

3 11 32

Reposted by Katie Insel

Save Health Research @savehealthresearch.bsky.social · Aug 17

Deadline extended

www.instagram.com/p/DNd-PdvyU3F/

Has your NIH grant been withdrawn, left without review, pending, or delayed?
Consider joining thousands of scientists represented in the
NIH VS. APHA case.
Deadline Monday, August 25st, 5pm EST.
@SaveHealthResearch

1 12 11

Reposted by Katie Insel

Dr. David Miller 🏳️‍🌈 @davidimiller.bsky.social · Aug 21

👍 An appeals court ruled today to **uphold** an order blocking grant terminations for U of California researchers

So good news for UC folks. Could also mean the case will soon end up at the Supreme Court (along with one that’s pending there now for NIH terminations).

storage.courtlistener.com

17 52

Reposted by Katie Insel

Tigist Tamir @phosphotig.bsky.social · Aug 15

This!
journals.biologists.com/jcs/article/...

Why would anyone want to be a scientist?

It is difficult to fathom why anyone intelligent enough to be a scientist would actually choose to be one. Doing good science requires the utmost exertion of body, mind and spirit, yet is consistently...

journals.biologists.com

4 11

Reposted by Katie Insel

Jeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · Aug 15

Here is the Priorities document (long thread)

1/n

Dear Colleagues:
I am sending this memo to clarify our priorities and ensure efforts to fulfill our mission are aligned across the agency. I want to start by expressing my gratitude for your advice and input thus far, and I look forward to our continued collaboration. I have had the opportunity now to visit labs and meet with teams across the agency, and I am constantly impressed. It is a privilege to work with such a dedicated and talented staff.
I recognize that several new initiatives and policies have been implemented in a short period of time, and there has been some confusion due to inaccurate media reports and rumors. Therefore, I have outlined select agency priorities at the end of this note to ensure you have a clearer picture of our rationale and objectives. I do not mean this memo to be an exhaustive list of all agency priorities, but rather a select list of topics that require our particular attention and focus while continuing the other important work you are all doing. This memo will help to ensure NIH supports only high-quality projects selected based on the merit of the science and that are aligned with our mission to generate data that can improve the health of all of the American people. I ask each of you to use this guidance when reviewing your intramural and extramural research portfolios and making decisions about your future programs.
In recent weeks, it has come to my attention that some at NIH and in the scientific community believe that there are “banned words” or some level of censorship of science ongoing or planned. This is simply untrue. I have advocated for academic freedom throughout my career, with a particular public focus in the last five years. My position has not changed; scientists must be allowed to pursue their ideas free of censorship or control by others. They must be able to express their scientific opinions and challenge scientific dogma.

9 46 80

Reposted by Katie Insel

Jeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · Aug 15

Today, Bhattacharya sent a document entitled

"NIH Priorities and Internal Review of Intramural and Extramural Programs"

to Institute and Center Directors and other leaders.

I am trying to get a clean copy.

These "Priorities" will likely be "Agency Priorities" for grant funding and termination.