Evil Eye Stalk
@krietzsche.bsky.social
Eye can't stand myself
All opinions are less than unqualified
All opinions are less than unqualified
Why doesn't anyone ever consider that if WE were the ones to define our enemies we would do a perfect job and only execute outstanding threats?
September 28, 2025 at 2:57 AM
Why doesn't anyone ever consider that if WE were the ones to define our enemies we would do a perfect job and only execute outstanding threats?
Someone posted this G R E A T Foucault quote a while back, it’s pertinent to understanding what MAGA is offering young men
September 23, 2025 at 1:35 AM
“Liberals already ruined it”
We know exactly what this is about
We know exactly what this is about
August 18, 2025 at 12:04 PM
“Liberals already ruined it”
We know exactly what this is about
We know exactly what this is about
Reposted by Evil Eye Stalk
Quick someone show him Postal 2
August 15, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Quick someone show him Postal 2
Good context, thank you!
August 15, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Good context, thank you!
Arguably the Nazis were highly decentralized, most of the time they weren’t working off explicit orders but instead vaguely working towards what they thought the Fuhrer wanted. A centralized system, if anything, will make prosecuting these fuckers much easier
August 15, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Arguably the Nazis were highly decentralized, most of the time they weren’t working off explicit orders but instead vaguely working towards what they thought the Fuhrer wanted. A centralized system, if anything, will make prosecuting these fuckers much easier
Bush was also extremely like this, I think the main difference is that they had the international communists and terrorism to localize their violence on. Trump is only different because he’s turning the American gun on America
August 13, 2025 at 2:28 PM
Bush was also extremely like this, I think the main difference is that they had the international communists and terrorism to localize their violence on. Trump is only different because he’s turning the American gun on America
“We don’t think it’s legal” concedes the possibility of an argument, I’d rather hear “It is illegal”
August 12, 2025 at 5:51 AM
“We don’t think it’s legal” concedes the possibility of an argument, I’d rather hear “It is illegal”
Scientific Marxism will do a number on anyone
August 12, 2025 at 5:48 AM
Scientific Marxism will do a number on anyone
Grifting the right? It’s 2025, time to grift the left
August 12, 2025 at 5:40 AM
Grifting the right? It’s 2025, time to grift the left
If it’s with steak absolutely it will
August 12, 2025 at 3:08 AM
If it’s with steak absolutely it will
*in Mr. Turner’s voice*
CURSE YOU KURZWEIL
CURSE YOU KURZWEIL
August 11, 2025 at 11:23 PM
*in Mr. Turner’s voice*
CURSE YOU KURZWEIL
CURSE YOU KURZWEIL
If a computer ever italicizes “bar” like that to me I will NOT be marrying it
August 11, 2025 at 11:16 PM
If a computer ever italicizes “bar” like that to me I will NOT be marrying it
What about massive neon signs indicating the PENIS AISLE and the VAGINA AISLE?
August 9, 2025 at 3:19 PM
What about massive neon signs indicating the PENIS AISLE and the VAGINA AISLE?
Rub ivermectin on it
August 8, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Rub ivermectin on it
Whereas most philosophical problems aren’t pragmatic, and if they become pragmatic they become applied disciplines. That consciousness could be reduced to engineering, with all the philosophical whys remaining underneath, is the sort of horrifying ‘abyss stares back’ moment that STEM worship hides
August 8, 2025 at 3:22 PM
Whereas most philosophical problems aren’t pragmatic, and if they become pragmatic they become applied disciplines. That consciousness could be reduced to engineering, with all the philosophical whys remaining underneath, is the sort of horrifying ‘abyss stares back’ moment that STEM worship hides
The “why” of how a bridge works can be as philosophically obfuscated as “why are we conscious” but like we can build bridges quite easily so the barrier of demonstrating “why” the bridge works is annihilated by the pragmatism of its consistent replicability
August 8, 2025 at 3:21 PM
The “why” of how a bridge works can be as philosophically obfuscated as “why are we conscious” but like we can build bridges quite easily so the barrier of demonstrating “why” the bridge works is annihilated by the pragmatism of its consistent replicability
There’s a sort of self-taught deference to pragmatism philosophy types cloak themselves in to preserve their sense of certainty and control of their existence, in modernity this comes across most in blind STEM worship
August 8, 2025 at 3:21 PM
There’s a sort of self-taught deference to pragmatism philosophy types cloak themselves in to preserve their sense of certainty and control of their existence, in modernity this comes across most in blind STEM worship