which is why I voted against almost all of these amendments. It was massive giveaway to the rich--now enshrined in the TX constitution. And any municipality that tried to offset these massive giveaways through bond amendments were threatened with a lawsuit my Paxton. Disgusting.

why! indeed. HUGE fan of this feed *and* Chatpile.

Were you in your bathrobe?

Looking forward to seeing this band at the Moody Amphitheatre!

ya hey

I will say it *again*: THIS is gender ideology.

2/2. "2.0" *IF* the black/brown representative loses, REP party steps in and says, "See! The DEMs are not the party for YOU! Come join our party because we get you!" (🤥) Purpose-filled fracturing of an electorate to legitimate/entrench minoritarian rule.

1/2: Southern Strategy 1.0 v 2.0: "1.0" used gerrymandering to pit the sitting brown/black DEM representative against the sitting white DEM representative to emphasize to the general election (white) public that the party is a black/brown party and hostile to white people.Southern Strategy 2.0:

I'll say it again, *this* is gender ideology.

Now *that* is gender ideology.

This from the great AP photographer Ashley Landis-+ @ashphotog on the Instagram....;)

For example,"...By incorrectly blaming female teachers, society may also end up downplaying some of the gendered harassment that girls and their female teachers experience — another problem that doesn’t seem to be abating..." 2/2

knurled rings of a live oak

Can't wait to see it!