De vraag is waarom ze deze retoriek hanteren en niet meer de richting van ja21 en vvd uitgegaan zijn qua retoriek. Kan een openingsbod zijn om de palen ver uit te zetten. Of ze gaan voor een minderheidskabinet, dat kan ook.

Het ware vage bewoordingen maar ging over investeren in onderwijs en Nederland kennisland. Ik snap je argwaan hoor, en wil zeker de concrete uitwerking zien, maar qua retoriek is er best wel sprake van een breuk (en minder naar rechts dan ik verwachtte van ebide partijen).

Over asiel en migratie heb je helemaal gelijk, maar voor de rest is dit discussiestuk toch een behoorlijke breuk met het vorige kabinet, imo? Qua stikstof, hypotheekaftrek, onderwijs en onderzoek zie ik toch wel grote verschillen (al kunnen de concrete uitwerkingen nog enorme verschillen maken)

I once had mangrove oysters in the DRC that were barbecued, and because they are less salty than sea oysters their flavor was more in the direction of scallops.

I don't know, I have never tasted smoked scallops. I think eel meets scallops in their relative mildness of taste, but the structure of scallops is less fishy. I do think that their reaction to smoking might be similar, though. And you are right about the flavors of the oysters, they are different.

Joking aside, maybe look for inspiration to bbq'ed oysters recipes? Or smoked eel, perhaps?

You must be the only person on this globe who impulse-buys smoked scallops.

which one?

Remembering names is the enemy of insight.

The translation of thought into a form that LLM's don't offer is very useful, though. I will start thinking about using your method next year.

Yes I can see that. But it can also be enhanced through the use of AI, for example brainstorming. Perhaps I don't mind this particular use of LMM's (would have to think it through with more time), but the long-term aspect of such projects makes it less controllable, I guess.

It's dirt simple as a testing method, and I am surprised how much they enjoy it. Groups are maximum 3-4 students, btw.

They love it because it is a group assignment, so they can discuss the concepts before writing them down. And it motivates them to read the texts, have them explained in the seminar, and then immediately apply them to an object.

I now give them in-class group assignments, where the students have to use the concepts of the class they just had to analyse, in group, an object. They can analyse in bullet points, but with offering details/examples. Surpsingly the students love it.

I use the metaphor of "wrestling with ideas", which doesn't come ready-made.

3. Reduce essay length & focus on concision, which at the moment AI does poorly.

4. Teach line-writing style.

and know that nothing will work until we move to pass/fail degrees and abandon classification of students.

2. Reinforce the idea that writing is self-exploration & self-discovery. Use chatgpt & you'll never escape the existential void.

We have moved to oral exams as a form of examination.